Literature DB >> 19945689

Monitoring osteoporosis treatment.

Juliet Compston1.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are recommended in some guidelines for monitoring osteoporosis treatment. However, evidence to support this approach is lacking, since treatment-induced changes in bone density may take up to 3 years to detect and do not predict fracture reduction. Biochemical markers of bone turnover have potential for monitoring since they change rapidly in response to treatment and are more predictive of fracture reduction, but variability of their measurement reduces their value in clinical practice. Neither approach has been shown to improve adherence to therapy. By contrast, there is evidence that discussion with a health-care professional improves treatment adherence, regardless of feedback about monitoring tests. At present, there is no justification for the use of bone-density measurement or bone-turnover markers in routine monitoring, but patients should be fully informed about their treatment and provided with the opportunity to discuss treatment-related issues with a health-care professional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945689     DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  18 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of bone turnover markers to monitor pharmacologic fracture prevention therapy.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Seasonal variation of bone turnover markers in top-level female skiers.

Authors:  Giovanni Lombardi; Alessandra Colombini; Marco Freschi; Rodolfo Tavana; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Socioeconomic status, race, and bone turnover in the Midlife in the US Study.

Authors:  C J Crandall; D Miller-Martinez; G A Greendale; N Binkley; T E Seeman; A S Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  W D Leslie; P Martineau; M Bryanton; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Assessment of aging characteristics of female condylar trabecular structure by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Guangnan Li; Haoliang Qian; Songsong Guo; Dongmiao Wang; Chao Sun; Yifei Du; Jie Cheng; Hongbing Jiang
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Evaluating spine micro-architectural texture (via TBS) discriminates major osteoporotic fractures from controls both as well as and independent of site matched BMD: the Eastern European TBS study.

Authors:  Jelena Vasic; Tzvetanka Petranova; Vladyslav Povoroznyuk; Carmen Gabriela Barbu; Mirjana Karadzic; Filip Gojkovic; Jelena Elez; Renaud Winzenrieth; Didier Hans; Violeta CulaficVojinovic; Catalina Poiana; Nataliia Dzerovych; Rasho Rashkov; Aleksandar Dimic
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Effect of isolated vitamin D supplementation on bone turnover markers in younger postmenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  J Nahas-Neto; L M Cangussu; C L Orsatti; F N Bueloni-Dias; P F Poloni; E B Schmitt; E A P Nahas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Fracture prediction from repeat BMD measurements in clinical practice.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S L Brennan-Olsen; S N Morin; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Is bone microarchitecture status of the lumbar spine assessed by TBS related to femoral neck fracture? A Spanish case-control study.

Authors:  L M Del Rio; R Winzenrieth; C Cormier; S Di Gregorio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.