Literature DB >> 19945333

A parametric study of cylindrical pedicle screw design implications on the pullout performance using an experimentally validated finite-element model.

Panagiotis E Chatzistergos1, Evangelos A Magnissalis, Stavros K Kourkoulis.   

Abstract

The present study aims to the design of a finite-element model simulating accurately the pullout behaviour of cylindrical pedicle screws and predicting their pullout force. Three commercial pedicle screws, subjected to pure pullout from synthetic bone, were studied experimentally. The results were used for the design, calibration and validation of a finite-element model. Special attention was paid to the accurate simulation of the failure inside the host material under shear. For this purpose, a bilinear cohesive zone material model was adopted, controlling the mode-II debonding of neighbouring elements in the vicinity of the screw. Comparison between experimental and numerical results proved that the implementation of this approach can significantly enhance the accuracy of the numerical simulation of a screw's mechanical behaviour under pure pullout loads. The numerical model was used for the parametric study of various factors affecting the pullout performance of a cylindrical pedicle screw. It was concluded that the major parameter influencing the pullout force is the outer radius (increasing its value by 36% increases the pullout force by 34%). The influence of the purchase length of the screw is of similar quantitative nature. The respective dependence on the thread inclination, depth and pitch was significantly weaker. (c) 2009 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945333     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  8 in total

1.  Effect of pilot hole on biomechanical and in vivo pedicle screw-bone interface.

Authors:  Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo César Rosa; Antonio Carlos Shimano; Helton L A Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Influence of thread design on anchorage of pedicle screws in cancellous bone: an experimental and analytical analysis.

Authors:  Martin Weidling; Martin Heilemann; Stephan Schoenfelder; Christoph E Heyde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Effect of bone material properties on effective region in screw-bone model: an experimental and finite element study.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Wei Qi; Yang Zhang; Zi-Xiang Wu; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Evaluating Pedicle-Screw Instrumentation Using Decision-Tree Analysis Based on Pullout Strength.

Authors:  Vicky Varghese; Venkatesh Krishnan; Gurunathan Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

5.  Finite Element- and Design of Experiment-Derived Optimization of Screw Configurations and a Locking Plate for Internal Fixation System.

Authors:  Wei Sheng; Aimin Ji; Runxin Fang; Gang He; Changsheng Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Biomechanical influence of the surgical approaches, implant length and density in stabilizing ankylosing spondylitis cervical spine fracture.

Authors:  Yaoyao Liu; Zhong Wang; Mingyong Liu; Xiang Yin; Jiming Liu; Jianhua Zhao; Peng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of the Insertion Type and Depth on the Pedicle Screw Pullout Strength: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  K Jendoubi; Y Khadri; M Bendjaballah; N Slimane
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Finite Element Analysis of Long Posterior Transpedicular Instrumentation for Cervicothoracic Fractures Related to Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Viktor Lison Almkvist; Claes Olerud; Peter Halldin; Madelen Fahlstedt
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-01-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.