Literature DB >> 19945140

Body size and body shape in early hominins - implications of the Gona pelvis.

Christopher Ruff1.   

Abstract

Discovery of the first complete Early Pleistocene hominin pelvis, Gona BSN49/P27, attributed to Homo erectus, raises a number of issues regarding early hominin body size and shape variation. Here, acetabular breadth, femoral head breadth, and body mass calculated from femoral head breadth are compared in 37 early hominin (6.0-0.26 Ma) specimens, including BSN49/P27. Acetabular and estimated femoral head sizes in the Gona specimen fall close to the means for non-Homo specimens (Orrorin tugenesis, Australopithecus africanus, Paranthropus robustus), and well below the ranges of all previously described Early and Middle Pleistocene Homo specimens. The Gona specimen has an estimated body mass of 33.2kg, close to the mean for the non-Homo sample (34.1kg, range 24-51.5kg, n=19) and far outside the range for any previously known Homo specimen (mean=70.5kg; range 52-82kg, n=17). Inclusion of the Gona specimen within H. erectus increases inferred sexual dimorphism in body mass in this taxon to a level greater than that observed here for any other hominin taxon, and increases variation in body mass within H. erectus females to a level much greater than that observed for any living primate species. This raises questions regarding the taxonomic attribution of the Gona specimen. When considered within the context of overall variation in body breadth among early hominins, the mediolaterally very wide Gona pelvis fits within the distribution of other lower latitude Early and Middle Pleistocene specimens, and below that of higher latitude specimens. Thus, ecogeographic variation in body breadth was present among earlier hominins as it is in living humans. The increased M-L pelvic breadth in all earlier hominins relative to modern humans is related to an increase in ellipticity of the birth canal, possibly as a result of a non-rotational birth mechanism that was common to both australopithecines and archaic Homo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19945140     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  36 in total

Review 1.  Middle childhood and modern human origins.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thompson; Andrew J Nelson
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-09

2.  Colloquium paper: terrestrial apes and phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Juan Luis Arsuaga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.

Authors:  Emma Nelson; Campbell Rolian; Lisa Cashmore; Susanne Shultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Between Scylla and Charybdis: renegotiating resolution of the 'obstetric dilemma' in response to ecological change.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  In vitro bone strain distributions in a sample of primate pelves.

Authors:  Kristi L Lewton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Sex prediction from the femur and hip bone using a sample of CT images from a Spanish population.

Authors:  Ana Clavero; Miquel Salicrú; Daniel Turbón
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Neandertal clavicle length.

Authors:  Erik Trinkaus; Trenton W Holliday; Benjamin M Auerbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Human variation in the shape of the birth canal is significant and geographically structured.

Authors:  Lia Betti; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Postcranial morphology of the middle Pleistocene humans from Sima de los Huesos, Spain.

Authors:  Juan Luis Arsuaga; José-Miguel Carretero; Carlos Lorenzo; Asier Gómez-Olivencia; Adrián Pablos; Laura Rodríguez; Rebeca García-González; Alejandro Bonmatí; Rolf M Quam; Ana Pantoja-Pérez; Ignacio Martínez; Arantza Aranburu; Ana Gracia-Téllez; Eva Poza-Rey; Nohemi Sala; Nuria García; Almudena Alcázar de Velasco; Gloria Cuenca-Bescós; José María Bermúdez de Castro; Eudald Carbonell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Daisuke Kubo; Reiko T Kono; Yousuke Kaifu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.