Literature DB >> 19941329

Effects of mechanical left ventricular unloading by Impella on left ventricular dynamics in high-risk and primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients.

Maurice Remmelink1, Krischan D Sjauw, José P S Henriques, Robbert J de Winter, Marije M Vis, Karel T Koch, Walter J Paulus, Bas A J M de Mol, Jan G P Tijssen, Jan J Piek, Jan Baan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We studied online left ventricular (LV) dynamic effects of mechanical LV unloading directly after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Limited clinical information is available on the direct LV dynamic consequences of LV unloading in patients undergoing high-risk PCI and primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
METHODS: The effects of the Impella LP2.5 device on LV dynamics were studied in 11 patients (elective high-risk PCI, n = 6; primary PCI, n = 5). LV pressure and volume were continuously assessed by a pressure-conductance catheter at 4 different support levels of the Impella, from 0 L/min at baseline to 2.5 L/min at maximal support.
RESULTS: The response to increased LV unloading was not different between both groups of patients. The pooled data showed no change on global and systolic LV function during increased LV unloading, while diastolic function showed improvement as indicated by an increased LV compliance in all patients. There was a decrease in end-diastolic pressure from 22 +/- 12 to 13 +/- 9 mm Hg (P = 0.0001), in end-diastolic elastance from 0.134 +/- 0.060 to 0.091 +/- 0.064 mm Hg/mL (P = 0.009), and in end-diastolic wall stress from 84 +/- 50 to 47 +/- 39 mm Hg (P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: LV unloading decreases end-diastolic wall stress and improves diastolic compliance dose-dependently. Our results indicate beneficial LV unloading effects of Impella during high-risk and primary PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19941329     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  18 in total

1.  Continuous flow left ventricular pump support and its effect on regional left ventricular wall stress: finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Choon-Sik Jhun; Kay Sun; Joshua P Cysyk
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Intraaortic Balloon Pump vs Peripheral Ventricular Assist Device Use in the United States.

Authors:  Yas Sanaiha; Boback Ziaeian; James W Antonios; Behdad Kavianpour; Ramtin Anousheh; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?

Authors:  Diego Arroyo; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-07-31

4.  Percutaneous Mechanical Ventricular Support in Acute Cardiac Care: A UK Quaternary Centre Experience Using 2.5L, 3.8L and 5.0L Impella Catheters.

Authors:  Vinod Venugopal; Jon Spiro; Alex Zaphiriou; Sohail Khan; Jonathan N Townend; Peter F Ludman; Sagar N Doshi
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2014-12-17

5.  The Duration of Impella 2.5 Circulatory Support and Length of Hospital Stay of Patients Undergoing High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Obiora Anusionwu; Daniel Fischman; Pramil Cheriyath
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2012-07-20

6.  Left Ventricular Unloading Using an Impella CP Improves Coronary Flow and Infarct Zone Perfusion in Ischemic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Shin Watanabe; Kenneth Fish; Jason C Kovacic; Olympia Bikou; Lauren Leonardson; Koichi Nomoto; Jaume Aguero; Navin K Kapur; Roger J Hajjar; Kiyotake Ishikawa
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Unprotected versus protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 in patients with multivessel disease and severely reduced left ventricular function.

Authors:  Tobias Becher; Frederik Eder; Stefan Baumann; Dirk Loßnitzer; Berit Pollmann; Michael Behnes; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.

Authors:  Dagmar M Ouweneel; Justin de Brabander; Mina Karami; Krischan D Sjauw; Annemarie E Engström; M Marije Vis; Joanna J Wykrzykowska; Marcel A Beijk; Karel T Koch; Jan Baan; Robbert J de Winter; Jan J Piek; Wim K Lagrand; Thomas Gv Cherpanath; Antoine Hg Driessen; Riccardo Cocchieri; Bas Ajm de Mol; Jan Gp Tijssen; José Ps Henriques
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2018-11-07

Review 10.  Effect of Atrioventricular Dyssynchrony on Impella Hemodynamics: Mechanism and Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Raj Baljepally; Hassan Tahir
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.