Literature DB >> 19940465

Evaluation of biological aging process - a population-based study of healthy people in China.

Xiaojuan Bai1, Lulu Han, Qiang Liu, Haiyan Shan, Hongli Lin, Xuefeng Sun, Xiang-Mei Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there have been cross-sectional and longitudinal studies examining biological age (BA) with chronological age (CA)-related changes in physical, physiological, biochemical, and hormonal variables, few studies have performed echocardiographic evaluation of the cardiovascular system and inflammatory biomarkers. Furthermore, little is known about biomarkers of aging and BA score (BAS) for healthy people in China.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify the biomarkers of healthy aging and to establish BAS for healthy people in China.
METHODS: We examined 2,876 men and women aged 30-98 years old in three Chinese cities, and 852 healthy subjects were assessed with 108 physical, morphological, physiological and biochemical variables. After excluding binary variables, variables that had a correlation coefficient with CA of < or =0.25 and redundant variables, eight variables including CA, arterial pulse pressure (PP), intima-media thickness (IMT), end diastolic velocity (EDV), ratio of peak velocity of early filling to atrial filling (E/A), mitral valve annulus lateral wall of peak velocity of early filling (MVEL), cystatin C (CYSC), and fibrinogen (FIB) were selected as candidate biomarkers of aging based on a factor-weighted BAS composite for predicting BA.
RESULTS: The BAS equation was 0.248 (CA) + 0.195 (IMT) - 0.196 (EDV) - 0.167 (E/A) - 0.166 (MVEL) + 0.188 (PP) + 0.182 (FIB) + 0.193 (CYSC). Individual BAS were significantly correlated with CA (r = 0.893, p < 0.001). Biological aging rate predicted by BAS was accelerated with increases in CA, and peaked when healthy men and women reached > or =75 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that BAS is superior to CA in assessing the rate of aging in healthy Chinese people. The cardiovascular variables play a crucial role in the evaluation of biological aging. Biological aging rate appears to be age specific. 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19940465     DOI: 10.1159/000262449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  12 in total

1.  Select aging biomarkers based on telomere length and chronological age to build a biological age equation.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Zhang; Shu-Ying Zhu; Xiao-Juan Bai; De-Long Zhao; Shi-Min Jian; Juan Li; Zuo-Xiang Li; Bo Fu; Guang-Yan Cai; Xue-Feng Sun; Xiang-Mei Chen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-06

2.  Model Construction for Biological Age Based on a Cross-Sectional Study of a Healthy Chinese Han population.

Authors:  W Zhang; L Jia; G Cai; F Shao; H Lin; Z Liu; F Liu; D Zhao; Z Li; X Bai; Z Feng; X Sun; X Chen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Construction of an integral formula of biological age for a healthy Chinese population using principle component analysis.

Authors:  W-G Zhang; X-J Bai; X-F Sun; G-Y Cai; X-Y Bai; S-Y Zhu; M Zhang; X-M Chen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Relationship between biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial/microcirculatory function in successful aging versus healthy youth: a transversal study.

Authors:  Daniel Alexandre Bottino; Flávia Gomes Lopes; Francisco José de Oliveira; Anete de Souza Mecenas; Ruth Clapauch; Eliete Bouskela
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 5.  Construction Formula of Biological Age Using the Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Linpei Jia; Weiguang Zhang; Rufu Jia; Hongliang Zhang; Xiangmei Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Biological age as a useful index to predict seventeen-year survival and mortality in Koreans.

Authors:  Jinho Yoo; Yangseok Kim; Eo Rin Cho; Sun Ha Jee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 7.  Common methods of biological age estimation.

Authors:  Linpei Jia; Weiguang Zhang; Xiangmei Chen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Biological age as a health index for mortality and major age-related disease incidence in Koreans: National Health Insurance Service - Health screening 11-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Young Gon Kang; Eunkyung Suh; Jae-Woo Lee; Dong Wook Kim; Kyung Hee Cho; Chul-Young Bae
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Application of biological age assessment of Chinese population in potential anti-ageing technology.

Authors:  Xufeng Li; Jiren Zhang; Chen Sun; Yuanyuan Zhang; Rui Cai; Shilin Fu; Jingfen Zheng; Dehai Huang
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.400

10.  Quantitative characterization of biological age and frailty based on locomotor activity records.

Authors:  Timothy V Pyrkov; Evgeny Getmantsev; Boris Zhurov; Konstantin Avchaciov; Mikhail Pyatnitskiy; Leonid Menshikov; Kristina Khodova; Andrei V Gudkov; Peter O Fedichev
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.