Literature DB >> 19940063

Characterization of a novel wood mouse virus related to murid herpesvirus 4.

David J Hughes1, Anja Kipar, Steven G Milligan, Charles Cunningham, Mandy Sanders, Michael A Quail, Marie-Adele Rajandream, Stacey Efstathiou, Rory J Bowden, Claude Chastel, Malcolm Bennett, Jeffery T Sample, Bart Barrell, Andrew J Davison, James P Stewart.   

Abstract

Two novel gammaherpesviruses were isolated, one from a field vole (Microtus agrestis) and the other from wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). The genome of the latter, designated wood mouse herpesvirus (WMHV), was completely sequenced. WMHV had the same genome structure and predicted gene content as murid herpesvirus 4 (MuHV4; murine gammaherpesvirus 68). Overall nucleotide sequence identity between WMHV and MuHV4 was 85 % and most of the 10 kb region at the left end of the unique region was particularly highly conserved, especially the viral tRNA-like sequences and the coding regions of genes M1 and M4. The partial sequence (71 913 bp) of another gammaherpesvirus, Brest herpesvirus (BRHV), which was isolated ostensibly from a white-toothed shrew (Crocidura russula), was also determined. The BRHV sequence was 99.2 % identical to the corresponding portion of the WMHV genome. Thus, WMHV and BRHV appeared to be strains of a new virus species. Biological characterization of WMHV indicated that it grew with similar kinetics to MuHV4 in cell culture. The pathogenesis of WMHV in wood mice was also extremely similar to that of MuHV4, except for the absence of inducible bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue at day 14 post-infection and a higher load of latently infected cells at 21 days post-infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19940063      PMCID: PMC2888160          DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.017327-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Virol        ISSN: 0022-1317            Impact factor:   3.891


INTRODUCTION

The most extensively characterized members of the family Herpesviridae that have hosts in the family Muridae are mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) and rat cytomegalovirus, which are classified in the genus Muromegalovirus of the subfamily Betaherpesvirinae, and murid herpesvirus 4 (MuHV4; also known as murine gammaherpesvirus 68, often abbreviated to MHV-68 or γHV-68; species Murid herpesvirus 4), classified in the genus Rhadinovirus of the subfamily Gammaherpesvirinae (Davison ; Efstathiou ). Species in the genus Rhadinovirus also represent five herpesviruses of primates and one of ungulates. However, these viruses are not closely related to MuHV4, and the best estimate is that the lineages within the genus diverged approximately 60 million years ago (McGeoch ). At least three other murid herpesviruses have been reported, although these are unclassified at present (Davison ). MuHV4 was originally isolated from bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and yellow-necked field mice (Apodemus flavicollis) in Slovakia (Blaskovic ; reviewed by Nash ). An epidemiological survey of MuHV4 infection in free-living rodents in the UK (Blasdell ) showed that MuHV4 is endemic in wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), but not bank voles, indicating that the wood mouse is a major natural host for this virus. Recent definitive molecular data has also shown that MuHV4 is present in free-living yellow-necked field and wood mice (Ehlers ). In consideration of these observations, a wood mouse infection model was developed as an alternative to a model utilizing the laboratory (house) mouse (Mus musculus), which has been used to date for MuHV4 studies (Hughes ). In comparison with the BALB/c laboratory mouse, the features of MuHV4 infection in the wood mouse are: (i) after intranasal inoculation, viral titres achieved in the lung are approximately 1000-fold lower; (ii) replication is restricted to scattered alveolar epithelial cells and macrophages within focal granulomatous infiltrations, rather than being evident as a diffuse, T-cell-dominated, interstitial pneumonitis; (iii) latently infected lymphocytes are abundant in inducible bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (iBALT); (iv) the spleens of wood mice show reduced splenomegaly and leukocytosis; (v) well-delineated secondary follicles with classical germinal centres are formed; and (vi) titres of neutralizing antibody to MuHV4 are significantly higher. The present study focused on the isolation and genetic and biological characterization of a novel MuHV4-like virus. Two independent strains were examined, one isolated in the present study from wood mice in Cheshire, UK, and the other from a white-toothed shrew (Crocidura russula) in Brest, France (Chastel ).

RESULTS

Genomic characterization of wood mouse herpesvirus (WMHV) and Brest herpesvirus (BRHV)

Three distinct viruses were obtained from free-living murids captured in Cheshire, UK. The isolation and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.

Isolation of herpesviruses from free-living rodents in Cheshire

Animal*Tissues harvested†Tissues yielding CPE†Herpesvirus particles‡
WM1TG, S, LTG, S+
WM2TG, S, LS+
WM3TG, S, L
WM4TG, S, L
WM5TG, S, L
WM6TG, S, L
WM7TG, S, LTG+
WM8TG, S, LTG, S+
BV1TG, S, L
FV1S, LS+
HM1TG, S, L
HM2TG, S, L
HM3TG, S, L
HM4TG, S, LS+
HM5TG, S, L
HM6TG, S, L

*WM, Wood mouse; BV, bank vole; FV, field vole; HM, house mouse; followed by a number for each animal.

†TG, Trigeminal ganglia; S, spleen; L, lungs; –, no cytopathic effect (CPE).

‡+, Particles observed by TEM; –, particles not observed by TEM, on negatively stained preparations.

The TEM-positive samples gave rise to PCR products from the DNA polymerase (DPOL) gene, whilst the TEM-negative samples did not (data not shown). The sequences of the 213 bp amplicons originating from WM1, WM2, WM7 and WM8 DPOL were identical to each other, regardless of the tissue from which the viruses were isolated. These sequences (minus the primers: 160 bp) exhibited 89 % nucleic acid identity and 94 % predicted amino acid sequence identity to the corresponding region of MuHV4 DPOL. The FV1 DPOL amplicon was also 213 bp in size, and the 160 bp sequence (minus primers) was more closely related to MuHV4 than to any other herpesvirus, with 61 % nucleic acid and 54 % amino acid sequence identity. The HM4 virus DNA yielded a DPOL PCR product of 231 bp (178 bp minus primers) that was closely related to MCMV (strain Smith) DPOL, with 99 % nucleic acid and 100 % amino acid sequence identity. These results confirmed the identification of two novel gammaherpesviruses. The WM isolates were designated WMHV and the FV1 isolate was designated field vole herpesvirus (FVHV). An initial analysis of the coding regions of genes M1, M2 and M3, which had been identified hitherto only in MuHV4, showed that cognate PCR products were detected in all WMHV isolates using MuHV4-specific primers, thus confirming the close relatedness of these isolates to MuHV4 (Fig. 1). In contrast, none of these genes was amplified from FVHV, consistent with its more distant relationship to MuHV4. The DNA sequences obtained from these PCR products for WMHV M1 and M3 were 97 and 94 % identical to MuHV4 M1 and M3, respectively, whilst WMHV and MuHV4 M2 sequences were more divergent, sharing only 83 % identity.
Fig. 1.

PCR amplification of the coding regions of the genes M1 (a), M2 (b) and M3 (c) from viruses isolated from FV1, WM1, WM2, WM7 and WM8, in comparison with MuHV4. TG, Trigeminal ganglia; S, spleen.

The complete nucleotide sequence of the WMHV genome was then determined. The genome structure deduced from the WMHV genome sequence was the same as that of MuHV4, consisting of a unique region (U) flanked at both ends by multiple direct repeats of a terminal repeat (TR). In WMHV and MuHV4, the size of U was 118 864 and 118 211 bp, respectively, and that of TR was 1244 and 1240 bp. Overall nucleotide sequence identity was 85 %. The predicted gene content of WMHV was the same as that for MuHV4, as represented by the most up-to-date annotation (GenBank accession no. NC_001826). A 71 913 bp segment of the BRHV genome was sequenced. This represented TR (1265 bp, plus a partial copy) linked to the left portion of U (70 439 bp) terminating within ORF53. The BRHV sequence was 86 and 99.2 % identical to the corresponding regions of the MuHV4 and WMHV genomes, respectively. The information used to annotate the genome sequences is shown in Supplementary Table S1 (available in JGV Online). Fig. 2 shows a representation of DNA sequence identity along the entire WMHV and MuHV4 genomes, and Fig. 3 provides details on amino acid sequence identity between WMHV, BRHV and MuHV4 protein-coding regions. The most highly conserved regions between WMHV and MuHV4 included two sets of internal tandem repeats and the region from the left end of U to the end of the M4 coding region, which included the eight viral tRNA-like genes (vtRNAs) (Bowden ). Although the vtRNAs were well conserved, there were functionally relevant differences in the sequences of microRNAs (miRNAs) 1, 2, 5, 6 and 9 that were derived from vtRNA primary transcripts (Fig. 4) (Pfeffer ). The most highly conserved coding regions at the amino acid sequence level were M4 (98.3 %), ORF43 (97.2 %), M1 (96.9 %) and ORF60 (96.7 %), and the least conserved were ORF73 (67.0 %), ORF51 (68.0 %) and M2 (72.8 %). In the comparable sequences, the most highly conserved coding regions at the amino acid sequence level between WMHV and BRHV were ORF8, ORF28, ORF29, ORF34, ORF43, ORF44 and ORF46 (each 100 %), and the least conserved were ORF45 (95.2 %), ORF51 (95.8 %) and M2 (97.4 %). Fig. 5 shows the amino acid sequence alignments for M1, M3 and M4 (which are related), and also M2, ORF51 and ORF73.
Fig. 2.

Variation between the genome sequences of WMHV and MuHV4. The lower part of the panels represents the genome, commencing in the first panel at the start of U and ending in the last panel with one copy of TR, which is shown in a thicker format. Protein-coding regions are depicted by shaded arrows, with connecting introns indicated by white horizontal bars and genes encoding the tRNA-like genes (1–8) shown as arrowheads. Internal tandem repeats are represented by black horizontal bars. The upper part of each panel shows the nucleotide divergence (nd) calculated for a 100 nt window, shifted by increments of 3 nt. A nucleotide position was counted as divergent if it differed between the two sequences; insertions and deletions were not scored.

Fig. 3.

Divergence between the amino acid sequences of predicted protein-coding regions in WMHV, BRHV and MuHV4. The histogram illustrates sequence divergence (% non-identity) between the amino acid sequence of predicted protein-coding regions in WMHV and MuHV4 (grey bars, all coding regions) and WMHV and BRHV (black bars, coding regions up to ORF52).

Fig. 4.

Alignment of the predicted nucleotide sequences of the tRNA-like genes and miRNAs from MuHV4 and WMHV. A diagrammatic representation of the genomic region showing the relative positions of these non-coding RNAs is shown at the top. The positions of the M1–M3 ORFs and viral tRNA-like transcripts (t1–t8) are indicated by arrows. The positions of the miRNAs (miR-M1-1 to miR-M1-9) derived from primary transcripts of the tRNA-like RNAs are shown by vertical lines. Sequence alignments of the tRNA/miRNA transcripts are shown below. The sections processed to generate the tRNA-like molecules are shaded grey and pre-miRNAs are shaded blue. The positions of the A and B boxes of the RNA polymerase III promoters are shown by boxes, as are the positions of the processed miRNAs. The positions of the anti-codons in the tRNAs are shown in blue type. Differences between MuHV4 and WMHV are shown in red type. Data for MuHV4 are from Bowden and Pfeffer .

Fig. 5.

Alignments of the predicted amino acid sequences of M1, M3 and M4 (a), M2 (b), ORF51 (c) and ORF73 (d). Each individual alignment consists of the sequences from MuHV4, WMHV and BRHV, with residues that differ from the consensus (or from each other in the case of ORF73) shaded grey. In (a), the alignments for M1, M3 and M4 are aligned with each other because these three proteins are related via the residues in bold type; each sequence contains a predicted signal peptide (lower case). In (b), the positions of PXXP motifs (P1–P9), tyrosine residues 120 and 129 and the CD8 CTL epitope (CTL) are indicated above the sequence. In (c), the bold residues indicate potential N-linked glycosylation sites in gp150 encoded by ORF51. In (d), the positions of the Brd4- and Brd2-interacting domains of the ORF73 protein are shown above the sequences.

Biological characterization of WMHV

The relative rates of growth of MuHV4 and WMHV in NIH3T3 cells were compared by determining a one-step growth curve as described previously (Macrae ) and were not significantly different (data not shown). Fig. 6 shows the features of infection of wood mice by WMHV in comparison with MuHV4. Infectious virus was detected in the lungs of wood mice infected with WMHV or MuHV4 at 7 days post-infection (p.i.), but not at 14 days p.i., and a significantly greater amount of infectious virus was recovered from MuHV4-infected wood mice at 7 days p.i. (Fig. 6a). The numbers of leukocytes per spleen isolated from infected wood mice were similar for WMHV and MuHV4 at all time points p.i. (Fig. 6b). There was an increase in the number of leukocytes at 14 days p.i. with both viruses, but this was marginal and transient, and infection with either virus did not induce significant splenomegaly. In WMHV- and MuHV4-infected wood mice, the number of latently infected cells per spleen increased dramatically from 7 days p.i., peaking at 14 days p.i. (Fig. 6c); the mean number of latently infected cells then declined approximately 6-fold by 21 days p.i. in WMHV-infected animals and 25-fold in the MuHV4-infected mice, and was largely unchanged at 28 days p.i. in both infections. The difference observed at 21 days p.i. was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Fig. 6.

Virological analyses of WMHV infection of wood mice. Wood mice (three per time point) were infected intranasally with 4×105 p.f.u. MuHV4 or WMHV. Results are shown as means±sd; the asterisk represents a statistically significant difference between species (P<0.05). (a) Infectious virus recovered from the lung at 7 and 14 days p.i. Titres were measured by plaque assay on NIH3T3 cells. (b) Mean leukocyte numbers per spleen. (c) Infective centre (i.c.) assay of the level of latency in splenocytes. Infectious virus titres in the samples were analysed in parallel and were subtracted from the number of total infectious centres.

Histological examination identified broadly similar changes in both WMHV- and MuHV4-infected wood mice that were similar to those reported in detail previously (Hughes ). On day 7 p.i., mild to moderate perivascular or peribronchial, B-cell-dominated lymphocyte infiltration with evidence of B-cell emigration from blood vessels was seen together with multifocal, predominantly perivascular macrophage and lymphocyte (i.e. granulomatous) infiltrates. There was a mild to moderate increase in the number of disseminated T and B cells in the interstitium. Viral antigen was scarce and was seen in occasional alveolar epithelial cells (type I and II pneumocytes) and in macrophages within the granulomatous infiltrates. The mediastinal lymph nodes and spleens of these animals contained primary and secondary follicles and unaltered T-cell zones. Rare viral antigen-positive macrophages were seen in the lymph nodes. At 14 days p.i., wood mice infected with MuHV4 displayed intense perivascular and peribronchial, B-cell-rich lymphocyte infiltration with evidence of lymphatic follicle formation (Fig. 7a, b). This has been described previously as iBALT (Hughes ). In contrast, in WMHV-infected animals, moderate multifocal perivascular and peribronchial B-cell infiltration and emigration was seen, but without distinct evidence of follicle formation (Fig. 7c, d). Granulomatous infiltrates were still observed in both groups; these contained macrophages exhibiting viral antigen. Large, well-delineated secondary follicles were observed in the spleens, and viral antigen-positive macrophages were detected in the red pulp. At 20 days p.i., both granulomatous infiltrates and perivascular and peribronchial lymphocyte infiltrations were still observed in the lungs. However, the follicle formation that was seen previously in MuHV4-infected wood mice had subsided. Spleens exhibited smaller secondary follicles than at day 14 p.i. Viral antigen-laden macrophages were seen in the spleen. In the lung, however, viral antigen expression was restricted to one individual macrophage in a granulomatous infiltrate in an MuHV4-infected animal. By day 28 p.i., the granulomatous infiltrates were few in number and small, but a mild to moderate perivascular and peribronchial lymphocyte infiltration remained. This persisted until 46 days p.i., to a mild degree. Thus, the changes observed were extremely similar except for the less intense B-cell infiltration and absence of iBALT in the lungs of WMHV-infected mice at day 14 p.i.
Fig. 7.

Cellular response to WMHV and MuHV4 infection in the lungs of wood mice at 14 days p.i. (a, b) Infection with MuHV4. (a) Intense peribronchial focal lymphocyte infiltration with evidence of lymphatic follicle formation (F). B, Bronchiole. (b) Focal perivascular B-cell infiltration with lymphatic follicle formation (F). A, Artery. (c, d) Infection with WMHV. (c) Moderate peribronchiolar focal lymphocyte infiltration (arrows). B, Bronchiole. (d) Artery with focal B-cell-dominated (CD45R-positive) perivascular lymphocyte infiltration (arrows). There is evidence of B-cell rolling and emigration (arrowheads). Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (a, c), or for the B-cell marker CD45R, using the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex method and Papanicolaou's haematoxylin counterstain (b, d). Bars, 50 μm (a); 20 μm (b–d).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated the abundance of herpesviruses in natural populations of wood mice in Cheshire. Two novel gammaherpesviruses, FVHV and WMHV, were isolated. Previous analyses have concluded that herpesvirus genomes of less than 95 % nucleotide sequence identity may represent different species (Ehlers ). Thus, the degree of divergence between WMHV and MuHV4, both overall (85 %) and within specific loci (e.g. M2 and ORF73; Figs 2 and 3), is probably sufficient to warrant classification of WMHV as a new species. Under the current taxonomic scheme, in which murid herpesvirus species are named after the host family, this virus species would be Murid herpesvirus 7. Although an epidemiological study of free-living rodents in the UK was unable to distinguish between the two viruses (Blasdell ), a PCR-based study of mice trapped in Germany (Ehlers ) indicated that MuHV4 is present predominantly in yellow-necked field mice (A. flavicollis), whereas WMHV is present in wood mice (A. sylvaticus). However, MuHV4 was detected in some wood mice. Thus, it is possible that the two viruses normally infect different Apodemus species, but that there is some crossover. The biological characteristics of the two viruses in the wood mouse model exhibited significant similarities. However, the viruses did differ in their ability to grow in the lungs, in the development of iBALT and also perhaps in the efficiency of reactivation from splenic leukocytes. Interestingly, WMHV was isolated from trigeminal ganglia as well as spleens, suggesting that this virus may be neurotropic during a natural infection. This hypothesis warrants further investigation. The analysis of the sequence of a large portion of the genome of the BRHV genome showed that the relationship of this virus to WMHV was sufficiently close (99 % identity) to warrant the consideration of WMHV and BRHV as strains of the same virus. Given that herpesviruses are thought generally to have evolved with their hosts (McGeoch ), this relationship was unanticipated, as the wood mouse and white-toothed shrew are classified in different mammalian orders, Rodentia (family Muridae) and Insectivora (family Soricidae), respectively. Thus, the claimed insectivore source of BRHV must be viewed as questionable. It is possible that the virus actually originated from a rodent, either by cross-infection in the wild or by laboratory contamination, as BRHV was isolated by passage in suckling mouse brains (Chastel ). Other viruses related to MuHV4 have been characterized, but none so far has been shown to be sufficiently divergent from MuHV4 to form a new species. Viruses isolated from bank voles or yellow-necked field mice at the same time as MuHV4 (MHV-76, MHV-72, MHV-60 and MHV-78) are considered to be strains of MuHV4. MHV-76, although originally characterized as a novel alphaherpesvirus due to its cytopathic effect (CPE) in vitro (Ciampor ; Svobodova ) and then as a betaherpesvirus (Hamelin & Lussier, 1992), was conclusively demonstrated to be a gammaherpesvirus (Macrae ). MHV-76 proved to be equivalent to MuHV4 with a 9538 bp deletion at the left end of U, which probably arose during passage of the virus in vivo or in vitro. MHV-72 ORF21 (encoding thymidine kinase) is identical in sequence to the corresponding MuHV4 gene (Raslova ), and ORF51 (encoding gp150) differs by five nucleotide substitutions (Macakova ). Analysis of 12 other loci has shown that MHV-72 is more divergent from MuHV4 than MHV-76, and that M1, M2 and M3 are absent; none the less, MHV-72 and MuHV4 are highly related (Oda ). It seems likely that uncharacterized herpesviruses (MHV-60 and MHV-78) isolated at the same time as MuHV4 may also be strains of MuHV4 (Mistríková ; Nash ). The WMHV genome is colinear with that of MuHV4, and the two viruses have the same predicted gene content (Figs 2 and 3). The reason for the generally higher degree of conservation of sequences near the left end of U is not known. Speculative explanations could centre on selective sweeps in this region of the genome or recombination between a WMHV-like virus and a virus more closely related to MuHV4. The non-coding sequences in this region, including the vtRNA-like transcripts, are generally highly conserved. However, there are differences in miRNAs 1, 2, 5, 6 and 9 derived from the primary transcripts of these vtRNAs (Fig. 4; Pfeffer ). The targets and exact functions of these miRNAs are not currently known (Pfeffer ), but these differences could have functional consequences and the comparative data could be informative. In addition to non-coding regions in this locus, the M1 and M4 proteins are highly conserved (Fig. 5). It has been proposed that the most likely function for the M4 protein is as a modulator of the innate immune system. M4 is expressed in vitro with kinetics similar to immediate-early genes (Ebrahimi ), and in vivo it is expressed during productive infection but not during latency (Virgin ). M4 does not appear to have a role during the initial stages of infection in vivo, but is important during establishment of latency in the spleen (Evans ; Geere ). M1 has been shown to stimulate a Vβ4+ CD8+ T cell in a way reminiscent of a superantigen and, by doing this, to facilitate latent infection (Evans ). The M3 protein, which is related to M1 and M4, is also well conserved, but somewhat less so than the M1 and M4 proteins, particularly towards the N terminus (Fig. 2). The secreted M3 protein is expressed strongly during lytic infection and probably to a lesser extent during latency (Simas ; Usherwood ; van Berkel ; Virgin ). In vitro, the M3 protein selectively binds chemokines associated with the antiviral inflammatory response (Parry ; van Berkel ). In the laboratory mouse, M3 was found to have a role in enhancing the amplification of latently infected B cells by affecting the CD8+ T-cell response (Bridgeman ), although this function was not seen in an independent study (van Berkel ). In the wood mouse model, M3 has a critical role in the amplification of latently infected B cells in the lung and the formation of iBALT containing these cells (Hughes ). Differences in M3 may therefore account for the lack of iBALT in WMHV-infected wood mice. The M2 protein is the most divergent of the four proteins encoded by the left end of the genome and is associated with latency (Husain ). Numerous reports largely agree that M2 is dispensable for long-term persistence, although MuHV4 recombinants lacking a functional M2 gene are less efficient in the establishment of latency following intranasal infection of mice (Clambey ; Jacoby ; Macrae ; Simas ). It has also been postulated that M2 is required for efficient colonization of follicle B cells and the development of these cells into memory B cells, a cell type exploited by MuHV4 for long-term latency (Simas ). Given the relationship, and possible overlap, between the hosts of WMHV and MuHV4, the divergence of the M2 gene in a region of low overall variation might reflect strong immune selection. Indeed, it has been shown that an H2-Kd-restricted CD8+ T-cell epitope present in M2 (Husain ) sets the latent load during persistent infection of laboratory mice (M. musculus) (Marques ). However, this epitope is not conserved between MuHV4 and WMHV (Fig. 5b), suggesting that it may not be functional in the Apodemus hosts. The generation of greater numbers of infective centres (a measure of latency) in the spleens of the WMHV-infected wood mice at 21 days p.i. (Fig. 6c) raises the possibility that M2 may have evolved in this virus to augment the expansion of latently infected cells during the acute phase of latency. Experiments to address this hypothesis could involve replacing MuHV4 M2 with WMHV M2 and testing the phenotype in wood mice. Furthermore, numerous PXXP motifs are found throughout MuHV4 M2 (labelled P1–P9; Fig. 5b), some of which have been shown to functionally bind SH3-domain-containing proteins, such as Vav1 (Madureira ; Rodrigues ). Of these, P3, P4 and P5 have not been conserved in WMHV or BRHV. Recent in vivo analysis showed that mutations of P3, P4 or P5 had no effect on the establishment of, or reactivation from, splenic latency (Herskowitz ). Taken together, these motifs are unlikely to be important for the signalling function of M2. In a similar vein, the tyrosine residues at positions 120 and 129 of M2, which have been proven to be functional (Herskowitz ; Pires de Miranda ), are conserved in both WMHV and BRHV, highlighting their importance for the M2 signalling function. The second most divergent protein in WMHV and MuHV4 is the virion glycoprotein gp150, encoded by ORF51. It seems likely that, in addition to exhibiting extensive differences in amino acid sequence, these proteins will be N-glycosylated differently in the two viruses (Fig. 5c). gp150 is a major target for the host antibody response, so it is likely to be under strong selective pressure (Gillet ). However, it is not clear why this membrane glycoprotein is more variable than others encoded by the two viruses. The most divergent protein in WMHV and MuHV4 is encoded by ORF73 (Fig. 5d). In vivo analyses of an MuHV4 mutant have shown that ORF73 is essential for the establishment and maintenance of latency (Fowler ), and preliminary characterization of ORF73 mRNAs suggests that their transcription is similar to that of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV; human herpesvirus 8) ORF73 encoding the protein LANA (Coleman ). In a similar way to KSHV LANA, the MuHV4 ORF73 protein interacts with cellular bromodomain-containing BET proteins leading to activation of the promoters of G1/S cyclins (Ottinger ). The reason for the sequence variability in ORF73 is not clear. However, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV; human herpesvirus 4) EBNA1 (the functional analogue of rhadinovirus ORF73 proteins) shows considerable variability among strains (Wrightham ), and this has consequences for EBV-associated disease (Mai ; Wang ), the function of EBNA1 as a transcriptional transactivator (Do ) and the CD8+ T-cell response (Bell ). In summary, WMHV is a novel MuHV4-like virus whose study will give further insight into gammaherpesvirus biology, especially in comparative terms alongside MuHV4.

METHODS

Cheshire herpesviruses

Isolation and growth.

Eight wood mice (WM1–WM8), a bank vole (BV1), a field vole (Microtus agrestis; FV1) and six house mice (HM1–HM6) were captured in Cheshire during 2002. The animals were killed by cervical dislocation and trigeminal ganglia, lungs and spleens were removed for virus reactivation. Virus was reactivated from trigeminal ganglia by explant culture as described previously (Efstathiou ). Virus was reactivated from the spleen using an infectious centre assay (Sunil-Chandra ). Lung tissue was homogenized and virus recovered as described previously (Stewart ). Mouse NIH3T3 cells (Todaro & Green, 1963) were used for all virus isolation experiments. Supernatants were examined as negatively stained preparations by TEM.

Preliminary sequence analysis.

Samples were tested for the presence of herpesvirus DPOL sequences by PCR. Whole-cell DNA from NIH3T3 cells was purified at 18–24 h p.i. using a QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen). PCR was carried out using the degenerate, deoxyinosine-substituted primers 5′-TGTAACTCGGTGTAYGGITTYACIGGIGT-3′ and 5′-CACAGAGTCCGTRTCICCRTAIAT-3′ (Ehlers ). PCR products were inserted into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and inserts were sequenced from three individual clones per product by Lark Technologies. Amino acid sequences deduced from the sequences of the PCR products were compared with known herpesvirus DPOL sequences using blast (Altschul ). To amplify protein-coding DNA from genes M1, M2 and M3, the samples were subjected to PCR using primers M1-f/M1-r (5′-TCATTGAGCAGCGGCGAC-3′ and 5′-GTATTCAGGCTTAGGACTG-3′; fragment size 1292 bp), M2-f/M2-r (5′-ATGGCCCCAACACCCCCAC-3′ and 5′-ACTCCTCGCCCCACTCCAC-3′; 577 bp) and M3-f/M3-r (5′-CTCTGGGAGAGCGTCAG-3′ and 5′-GTTACTGAGTATCAATGATCC-3′; 1251 bp), respectively. PCR products were sequenced as described above. The sequences obtained, minus those of the primers, accounted for the entire protein-coding region of each gene except for a few codons at one or both ends.

Genome sequence analysis.

Virus isolated from WM8 spleen was plaque purified three times from infected NIH3T3 cells overlaid with agarose, and a master stock of cell-associated virus was prepared and titrated. For the purposes of the present study, this virus was designated wood mouse herpesvirus (WMHV). WMHV was found to be primarily cell-associated in culture. To prepare virions for DNA extraction, WMHV was grown in a mouse cell line (αβSV1) deficient in the response to alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β). This line was derived by first generating mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Todaro & Green, 1963) from IFN-α/β receptor knockout mice (Muller ). These cells were then transformed by transfection with a plasmid expressing simian virus 40 T antigen (from plasmid pVU0; Kalderon ) to generate an immortal cell line. The resulting cell line was found in preliminary experiments to release a much higher level of cell-free virus. Twenty 150 cm2 tissue culture flasks of subconfluent αβSV1 cells were infected with WMHV at an m.o.i. of 0.01 for 7 days. Virus DNA was then purified as described previously (Baldick ) and its integrity confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The DNA was sequenced at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute by a standard random shotgun approach to a mean coverage of 12 reads per nucleotide. Tandem repeat regions in the genome were determined using the program mreps (Kolpakov ), and the genome ends were inferred by comparison with the MuHV4 sequence (GenBank accession no. U97553; Virgin ). The main computer programs used to analyse the sequence were as follows: for sequence annotation, Artemis (Rutherford ), act (Carver ) and Sequin (NCBI); for sequence alignment, clustal w (Thompson ) and mafft (Katoh & Toh, 2008); for DNA sequence analyses, gcg (Accelrys) and emboss (Rice ); for amino acid sequence analysis, gcg, ExPASy (Gasteiger ), PTrans (Taylor, 1986) and Philius (Reynolds ); and for similarity searches, blast and fasta and its relatives (Pearson & Lipman, 1988).

Biological characterization.

The growth properties of WMHV were compared with those of MuHV4 in laboratory-bred wood mice using procedures described by Sunil-Chandra . All animal work was performed under UK Home Office Project Licence number 40/2483 and Personal Licence number 60/6501. Wood mice were obtained from an outbred colony established at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, UK (Bennett ; Feore ). This colony was obtained from Dr J. Clarke in 1995, and was derived from captive-bred colonies that had been maintained for several decades in the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK, with only occasional introductions of new stock from the wild. Their general housing and maintenance has been described elsewhere (Clarke, 1998), and at Liverpool they are maintained under semi-barrier conditions. The Liverpool colony has suffered no clinical disease, and, although not specified pathogen free in the sense used for most laboratory rodents, all samples tested for the major infections of laboratory rodents have so far been negative. Of particular relevance to this study, no evidence of MuHV4 infection has been detected by serology and PCR analysis (Blasdell ). Both male and female wood mice of 5–8 weeks of age were used. They were infected intranasally with 4×105 p.f.u. virus, and the lungs, spleens and bronchial lymph nodes were harvested at various times p.i. Lung tissue was homogenized, and the lysate was freeze–thawed three times and used in plaque assays. Leukocytes were purified from the spleens and counted, and virus reactivation was monitored using an infective centre assay. Tissues from infected wood mice were routinely processed for histopathological examination, including immunohistology.

Brest herpesvirus

The herpesvirus Brest/AN711 isolated from a white-toothed shrew (Chastel ) was grown and titrated on baby hamster kidney cells as described previously (Bridgeman ). For the purposes of the present study, this virus was named Brest herpesvirus (BRHV). To prepare viral DNA, confluent monolayers of cells in 175 cm2 flasks were infected at an m.o.i. of 0.01. When CPE was complete at approximately 4 days p.i., virions were purified from the medium by Ficoll gradient ultracentrifugation as described previously (Lopes ). Banded virus was diluted with PBS to a total volume of 30 ml and pelleted at 30 000  for 90 min. The pelleted virus was resuspended in Tris/EDTA (TE) buffer containing 0.5 % (w/v) SDS and 50 μg proteinase K ml−1. The mixture was incubated overnight at 37 °C and extracted with phenol, and the DNA was precipitated in ethanol and dissolved in a small volume of TE buffer, as described above. Initial cloning involved the generation of a small library of bacteriophage M13 recombinants containing BRHV AluI fragments, using standard methods. The inserts in three recombinants were sequenced and found by a blast similarity search to be most closely related to the MuHV4 genome. Respectively, the insert sizes were 148, 145 and 156 bp and exhibited 89.2, 96.6 and 90.4 % nucleotide sequence identity to ORF18, ORF31 and ORF60.

Partial genome sequence analysis.

A cosmid library was generated from BRHV DNA as described previously (Cunningham & Davison, 1993). Three overlapping cosmid clones constituting approximately 70 kb of the genome were sequenced, the first by a standard random shotgun approach, and the other two by iterative primer walking on both strands, based initially on data generated from the first cosmid or arising from the preliminary sequence analysis described above. The computer programs used for analysis are listed above.
  75 in total

1.  The M4 gene of gammaHV68 encodes a secreted glycoprotein and is required for the efficient establishment of splenic latency.

Authors:  Andrew G Evans; Nathaniel J Moorman; David O Willer; Samuel H Speck
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 3.616

2.  ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool.

Authors:  Tim J Carver; Kim M Rutherford; Matthew Berriman; Marie-Adele Rajandream; Barclay G Barrell; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Functional advantage of NPC-related V-val subtype of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 compared with prototype in epithelial cell line.

Authors:  Shi-Juan Mai; Tadamasa Ooka; Da-Jiang Li; Mu-Sheng Zeng; Ri-Cheng Jiang; Xing-Juan Yu; Ru-Hua Zhang; Shi-Ping Chen; Yi-Xin Zeng
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Activation of Vav by the gammaherpesvirus M2 protein contributes to the establishment of viral latency in B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Lénia Rodrigues; Marta Pires de Miranda; María J Caloca; Xosé R Bustelo; J Pedro Simas
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Analysis of genomic homology of murine gammaherpesvirus (MHV)-72 to MHV-68 and impact of MHV-72 on the survival and tumorigenesis in the MHV-72-infected CB17 scid/scid and CB17+/+ mice.

Authors:  Wakako Oda; Jela Mistrikova; Marta Stancekova; Bernadette M Dutia; Anthony A Nash; Hiroyuki Takahata; Zaishun Jin; Takashi Oka; Kazuhiko Hayashi
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.534

6.  Identification of novel rodent herpesviruses, including the first gammaherpesvirus of Mus musculus.

Authors:  Bernhard Ehlers; Judit Küchler; Nezlisah Yasmum; Güzin Dural; Sebastian Voigt; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit; Thomas Jäkel; Franz-Rainer Matuschka; Dania Richter; Sandra Essbauer; David J Hughes; Candice Summers; Malcolm Bennett; James P Stewart; Rainer G Ulrich
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Transcription of the murine gammaherpesvirus 68 ORF73 from promoters in the viral terminal repeats.

Authors:  Heather M Coleman; Stacey Efstathiou; Philip G Stevenson
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.891

8.  Murine gamma-herpesvirus 68 latency protein M2 binds to Vav signaling proteins and inhibits B-cell receptor-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in WEHI-231 B cells.

Authors:  Patrícia A Madureira; Paulo Matos; Inês Soeiro; Linda K Dixon; J Pedro Simas; Eric W-F Lam
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Topics in herpesvirus genomics and evolution.

Authors:  Duncan J McGeoch; Frazer J Rixon; Andrew J Davison
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.303

10.  The M4 gene of murine gammaherpesvirus 68 modulates latent infection.

Authors:  Hannah M Geere; Yvonne Ligertwood; Kerra M Templeton; Ian Bennet; Babunilayam Gangadharan; Susan M Rhind; Anthony A Nash; Bernadette M Dutia
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.891

View more
  14 in total

1.  Herpesvirus systematics.

Authors:  Andrew J Davison
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Amplification of JNK signaling is necessary to complete the murine gammaherpesvirus 68 lytic replication cycle.

Authors:  James A Stahl; Clinton R Paden; Shweta S Chavan; Veronica MacLeod; Ricky D Edmondson; Samuel H Speck; J Craig Forrest
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Molecular detection of murine herpesvirus 68 in ticks feeding on free-living reptiles.

Authors:  Martina Ficová; Tatiana Betáková; Peter Pančík; Radovan Václav; Pavol Prokop; Zuzana Halásová; Marcela Kúdelová
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  CTCF and Sp1 interact with the Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 internal repeat elements.

Authors:  Hannah C Stevens; Kevin S-W Cham; David J Hughes; Ren Sun; Jeffery T Sample; Vivien J Bubb; James P Stewart; John P Quinn
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.332

5.  Detection of Murine Herpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) in Dermacentor reticulatus Ticks.

Authors:  Marcela Kúdelová; Petra Belvončíková; Michaela Vrbová; Alžbeta Kovaľová; Iveta Štibrániová; Paulína Kocáková; Mirko Slovák; Eva Špitalská; Barbora Lapuníková; Radka Matúšková; Miroslava Šupolíková
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  First detection of murine herpesvirus 68 in adult Ixodes ricinus ticks.

Authors:  Marcela Kúdelová; Monika Jánošová; Petra Belvončíková
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  Tracking murine gammaherpesvirus 68 infection of germinal center B cells in vivo.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins; Samuel H Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A gammaherpesvirus cooperates with interferon-alpha/beta-induced IRF2 to halt viral replication, control reactivation, and minimize host lethality.

Authors:  Pratyusha Mandal; Bridgette E Krueger; Darby Oldenburg; Katherine A Andry; R Suzanne Beard; Douglas W White; Erik S Barton
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Gammaherpesvirus infection modulates the temporal and spatial expression of SCGB1A1 (CCSP) and BPIFA1 (SPLUNC1) in the respiratory tract.

Authors:  Gail H Leeming; Anja Kipar; David J Hughes; Lynne Bingle; Elaine Bennett; Nathifa A Moyo; Ralph A Tripp; Alison L Bigley; Colin D Bingle; Jeffery T Sample; James P Stewart
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.662

10.  Identification of novel anelloviruses with broad diversity in UK rodents.

Authors:  Shoko Nishiyama; Bernadette M Dutia; James P Stewart; Anna L Meredith; Darren J Shaw; Peter Simmonds; Colin P Sharp
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.