Literature DB >> 1993792

Dissection of the aorta associated with congenital malformation of the aortic valve.

C S Roberts1, W C Roberts.   

Abstract

The association of congenital aortic valve malformation and aortic dissection is analyzed. Over a 30 year period, 186 patients with non-iatrogenic aortic dissection were studied at necropsy. The aortic valve was tricuspid in 170 (91.4%), bicuspid in 14 (7.5%) and unicuspid in 2 (1.1%). Among the 16 patients with aortic dissection and a congenitally malformed valve, the age at death ranged from 17 to 82 years (mean 52) and 13 (81%) were men. The entrance tear of the aortic dissection was located in the ascending aorta in all 16 patients with a malformed valve but in only 68% of those with a tricuspid aortic valve. The aortic valve was stenotic in 6 of the 16 patients with a congenitally malformed valve. Fatal rupture of the false channel occurred after acute ascending aortic dissection in each of the 11 patients (none with healed dissection) who did not have operative therapy for the dissection. Two of the 16 patients with a malformed valve compared with no patient with a tricuspid aortic valve had aortic isthmic coarctation. Histologic sections of aorta from 10 patients disclosed severe degeneration of the elastic fibers of the media in 9 patients. Thus, a congenitally malformed aortic valve appears to be present at least 5 times more frequently in adults with than in those without aortic dissection, and in our patients the entrance tear was always in the ascending aorta, which usually had severe loss of elastic fibers in its media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1993792     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80188-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  50 in total

Review 1.  [Echocardiographic evaluation in unoperated congenital heart disease in adults].

Authors:  A Geibel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  C Ward
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Bicuspid aortic valve and coarctation: two villains part of a diffuse problem.

Authors:  C A Warnes
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  51-year-old man with heart murmur.

Authors:  Tanya H Tajouri; Gautam Kumar; Kyle W Klarich
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Jee Young Son; Sung Min Ko; Jin Woo Choi; Meong Gun Song; Hweung Kon Hwang; Sook Jin Lee; Joon-Won Kang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Management of patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Todd L Kiefer; Andrew Wang; G Chad Hughes; Thomas M Bashore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 7.  Pediatric cardiology for the primary care pediatrician.

Authors:  M Regina Lantin-Hermoso
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  William Clifford Roberts, MD: an interview by W. Bruce Fye, MD.

Authors:  William C Roberts; W Bruce Fye
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-07

9.  Aortic valve repair in children.

Authors:  Yves d'Udekem
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

Review 10.  A measured approach to managing the aortic root in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Ismail El-Hamamsy; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.