Literature DB >> 19937390

In vivo bioluminescence imaging of murine xenograft cancer models with a red-shifted thermostable luciferase.

Laura Mezzanotte1, Raffaella Fazzina, Elisa Michelini, Roberto Tonelli, Andrea Pession, Bruce Branchini, Aldo Roda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conventional in vivo bioluminescence imaging using wild-type green-emitting luciferase is limited by absorption and scattering of the bioluminescent signal through tissues. Imaging methods using a red-shifted thermostable luciferase from Photinus pyralis were optimized to improve the sensitivity and image resolution. In vivo bioluminescence imaging performance of red- and green-emitting luciferases were compared in two different xenograft mouse models for cancer.
METHODS: Human hepatoblastoma cell line (HepG2) and human acute monocytic leukemia cell line (Thp1) cells were genetically engineered using retroviral vector technology to stably express the red-shifted or the wild-type green luciferase. A xenograft model of liver cancer was established by subcutaneous injection of the HepG2-engineered cells in the flank regions of mice, and a leukemia model was generated by intravenous injection of the engineered Thp1 cells. The cancer progression was monitored with an ultrasensitive charge-coupled device camera. The relative intensities of the green- and red-emitting luciferases were measured, and the resulting spatial resolutions of the images were compared. Imaging was performed with both intact and scarified live animals to quantify the absorption effects of the skin and deep tissue.
RESULTS: The red-emitting luciferase was found to emit a bioluminescence signal with improved transmission properties compared to the green-emitting luciferase. By imaging the HepG2 models, which contained tumors just beneath the skin, before and after scarification, the percentage of light absorbed by the skin was calculated. The green bioluminescent signal was 75 +/- 8% absorbed by the skin, whereas the red signal was only 20 +/- 6% absorbed. The Thp1 model, which contains cancer cells within the bones, was likewise imaged before and after scarification to calculate the percentage of light absorbed by all tissue under the skin. This tissue was responsible for 90 +/- 5% absorption of the green signal, but only 65 +/- 6% absorption of the red signal.
CONCLUSION: Two different bioluminescent mouse cancer models demonstrate the utility of a new red-shifted thermostable luciferase, Ppy RE-TS, that improved the in vivo imaging performance when compared with wild-type P. Pyralis luciferase. While wild-type luciferase is currently a popular reporter for in vivo imaging methods, this study demonstrates the potential of red-emitting firefly luciferase mutants to enhance the performance of bioluminescence imaging experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937390     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0291-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  20 in total

1.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 spinoculation enhances infection through virus binding.

Authors:  U O'Doherty; W J Swiggard; M H Malim
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging.

Authors:  Vasilis Ntziachristos; Jorge Ripoll; Lihong V Wang; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Emission spectra of bioluminescent reporters and interaction with mammalian tissue determine the sensitivity of detection in vivo.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Timothy C Doyle; Olivier Coquoz; Flora Kalish; Bradley W Rice; Christopher H Contag
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  G1 cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis by histone deacetylase inhibition in MLL-AF9 acute myeloid leukemia cells is p21 dependent and MLL-AF9 independent.

Authors:  R Tonelli; R Sartini; R Fronza; F Freccero; M Franzoni; D Dongiovanni; M Ballarini; S Ferrari; M D'Apolito; G Di Cola; G Capranico; A Khobta; R Campanini; P Paolucci; S Minucci; A Pession
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Quantitative comparison of click beetle and firefly luciferases for in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Tewfik Miloud; Carmen Henrich; Günter J Hämmerling
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 6.  Advances in optical imaging and novel model systems for cancer metastasis research.

Authors:  Nico V Henriquez; Petra G M van Overveld; Ivo Que; Jeroen T Buijs; Richard Bachelier; Eric L Kaijzel; Clemens W G M Löwik; Philippe Clezardin; Gabri van der Pluijm
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Red-shifted Renilla reniformis luciferase variants for imaging in living subjects.

Authors:  Andreas Markus Loening; Anna M Wu; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-07-08       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  A redshifted codon-optimized firefly luciferase is a sensitive reporter for bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Henrike Caysa; Roland Jacob; Nadine Müther; Bruce Branchini; Martin Messerle; Ariane Söling
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  A novel bioluminescent mouse model and effective therapy for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.

Authors:  Sherry T Shu; Murali V P Nadella; Wessel P Dirksen; Soledad A Fernandez; Nanda K Thudi; Jillian L Werbeck; Michael D Lairmore; Thomas J Rosol
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Validating bioluminescence imaging as a high-throughput, quantitative modality for assessing tumor burden.

Authors:  Zain Paroo; Robert A Bollinger; Dwaine A Braasch; Edmond Richer; David R Corey; Peter P Antich; Ralph P Mason
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.488

View more
  12 in total

1.  Comparison of red-shifted firefly luciferase Ppy RE9 and conventional Luc2 as bioluminescence imaging reporter genes for in vivo imaging of stem cells.

Authors:  Yajie Liang; Piotr Walczak; Jeff W M Bulte
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  In vivo imaging of hydrogen peroxide production in a murine tumor model with a chemoselective bioluminescent reporter.

Authors:  Genevieve C Van de Bittner; Elena A Dubikovskaya; Carolyn R Bertozzi; Christopher J Chang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  SAMHD1 modulates in vitro proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia-derived THP-1 cells through the PI3K-Akt-p27 axis.

Authors:  Karthik M Kodigepalli; Serena Bonifati; Nagaraja Tirumuru; Li Wu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Sensitive dual color in vivo bioluminescence imaging using a new red codon optimized firefly luciferase and a green click beetle luciferase.

Authors:  Laura Mezzanotte; Ivo Que; Eric Kaijzel; Bruce Branchini; Aldo Roda; Clemens Löwik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  In vivo bioluminescent imaging (BLI): noninvasive visualization and interrogation of biological processes in living animals.

Authors:  Dan M Close; Tingting Xu; Gary S Sayler; Steven Ripp
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  A synthetic luciferin improves bioluminescence imaging in live mice.

Authors:  Melanie S Evans; Joanna P Chaurette; Spencer T Adams; Gadarla R Reddy; Miranda A Paley; Neil Aronin; Jennifer A Prescher; Stephen C Miller
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Click beetle luciferase mutant and near infrared naphthyl-luciferins for improved bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Mary P Hall; Carolyn C Woodroofe; Monika G Wood; Ivo Que; Moniek Van't Root; Yanto Ridwan; Ce Shi; Thomas A Kirkland; Lance P Encell; Keith V Wood; Clemens Löwik; Laura Mezzanotte
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Bioluminescence imaging of leukemia cell lines in vitro and in mouse xenografts: effects of monoclonal and polyclonal cell populations on intensity and kinetics of photon emission.

Authors:  Sandra Christoph; Jennifer Schlegel; Francesca Alvarez-Calderon; Yong-Mi Kim; Luis N Brandao; Deborah DeRyckere; Douglas K Graham
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 9.  Hepatoblastoma: A Need for Cell Lines and Tissue Banks to Develop Targeted Drug Therapies.

Authors:  Rishi Raj Rikhi; Kimberlee K Spady; Ruth I Hoffman; Michael S Bateman; Max Bateman; Lisa Easom Howard
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.418

10.  Proteasome and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) inhibitors as therapeutic alternative in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Angela Isabel Pereira Eugênio; Veruska Lia Fook-Alves; Mariana Bleker de Oliveira; Rodrigo Carlini Fernando; Daniela B Zanatta; Bryan Eric Strauss; Maria Regina Regis Silva; Marimélia Aparecida Porcionatto; Gisele Wally Braga Colleoni
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.