PURPOSE: Eribulin mesylate, an halichondrin B analog, binds to tubulin and microtubules and possesses broad anti-cancer activity. We conducted a multi-institutional Phase II trial to evaluate the response rate of eribulin mesylate in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty eligible patients who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent SCCHN were enrolled with the following characteristics: 29 male, 11 female; median age 61.2 years; Zubrod Performance Status of 0 (48%) and 1 (53%). Thirty-three patients (83%) had metastatic disease. Primary tumor sites included: 38% oropharynx, 30% lip/oral cavity, 15% larynx, 10% hypopharynx, 5% other/unknown and 3% nasopharynx. Patients received eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m² on Days 1 and 8 of an every 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Common Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (15%), leukocytopenia (13%), neutropenia (10%), hyponatremia (5%), fatigue (5%), diarrhea (5%) and dyspnea (5%), with one treatment-related death due to pulmonary hemorrhage. Among 40 assessable patients, two confirmed partial responses were observed, for an estimated confirmed response rate of 5% (95% confidence interval: 1-17%). The estimated median progression-free survival is 3 months (95% confidence interval: 1-3 months) and estimated median overall survival is 7 months (95% confidence interval: 5-10 months). CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin mesylate given on Days 1 and 8 of a twenty-one day cycle in metastatic or recurrent SCCHN was well tolerated, but did not result in a clinically significant median PFS. Studies of other agents should be considered in this setting.
PURPOSE:Eribulin mesylate, an halichondrin B analog, binds to tubulin and microtubules and possesses broad anti-cancer activity. We conducted a multi-institutional Phase II trial to evaluate the response rate of eribulin mesylate in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty eligible patients who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent SCCHN were enrolled with the following characteristics: 29 male, 11 female; median age 61.2 years; Zubrod Performance Status of 0 (48%) and 1 (53%). Thirty-three patients (83%) had metastatic disease. Primary tumor sites included: 38% oropharynx, 30% lip/oral cavity, 15% larynx, 10% hypopharynx, 5% other/unknown and 3% nasopharynx. Patients received eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m² on Days 1 and 8 of an every 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Common Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (15%), leukocytopenia (13%), neutropenia (10%), hyponatremia (5%), fatigue (5%), diarrhea (5%) and dyspnea (5%), with one treatment-related death due to pulmonary hemorrhage. Among 40 assessable patients, two confirmed partial responses were observed, for an estimated confirmed response rate of 5% (95% confidence interval: 1-17%). The estimated median progression-free survival is 3 months (95% confidence interval: 1-3 months) and estimated median overall survival is 7 months (95% confidence interval: 5-10 months). CONCLUSIONS:Eribulin mesylate given on Days 1 and 8 of a twenty-one day cycle in metastatic or recurrent SCCHN was well tolerated, but did not result in a clinically significant median PFS. Studies of other agents should be considered in this setting.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Donnette A Dabydeen; James C Burnett; Ruoli Bai; Pascal Verdier-Pinard; Sarah J H Hickford; George R Pettit; John W Blunt; Murray H G Munro; Rick Gussio; Ernest Hamel Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Matthew Arquette; Dong M Shin; Karel Dicke; Everett E Vokes; Nozar Azarnia; Waun Ki Hong; Merrill S Kies Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael K Gibson; Yi Li; Barbara Murphy; Maha H A Hussain; Ronald C DeConti; John Ensley; Arlene A Forastiere Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A A Forastiere; B Metch; D E Schuller; J F Ensley; L F Hutchins; P Triozzi; J A Kish; S McClure; E VonFeldt; S K Williamson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mary Ann Jordan; Kathryn Kamath; Tapas Manna; Tatiana Okouneva; Herbert P Miller; Celia Davis; Bruce A Littlefield; Leslie Wilson Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Ezra E W Cohen; Darren W Davis; Theodore G Karrison; Tanguy Y Seiwert; Stuart J Wong; Sreenivasa Nattam; Mark F Kozloff; Joseph I Clark; Duen-Hwa Yan; Wen Liu; Carolyn Pierce; Janet E Dancey; Kerstin Stenson; Elizabeth Blair; Allison Dekker; Everett E Vokes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-02-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Tatiana Okouneva; Olga Azarenko; Leslie Wilson; Bruce A Littlefield; Mary Ann Jordan Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Ruoli Bai; Tam Luong Nguyen; James C Burnett; Onur Atasoylu; Murray H G Munro; George R Pettit; Amos B Smith; Rick Gussio; Ernest Hamel Journal: J Chem Inf Model Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 4.956
Authors: Daniel J Renouf; Patricia A Tang; Pierre Major; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Bindi Dhesy-Thind; John R Goffin; David Hedley; Lisa Wang; L Doyle; Malcolm J Moore Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.850