Literature DB >> 19937339

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--comparison of early postoperative results in an Australian rural centre and a German university hospital.

Matthias W Wichmann1, Reinhold Lang, Eben Beukes, Shaukat T Esufali, Karl-Walter Jauch, Tanyia K Hüttl, Thomas P Hüttl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallstone disease. Cultural as well as organisational differences can result in significant variations of postoperative length of stay. AIM OF THE PRESENT STUDY: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether differences in postoperative length of stay and early postoperative outcome can be observed by comparison of an Australian rural centre and a German university hospital.
RESULTS: Between February 2006 and August 2007 (18 months), 359 patients (140 Australia, 219 Germany) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Mean patient age was 50.4 +/- 1.5 and 53.5 +/- 1.0 years, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of the Australian and 62% of the German patients were female. Twenty-one percent and 20% of the procedures were emergencies, respectively. Median American Society of Anaesthesiologists score of all patients was two. The conversion rate was 8% in both centres. A 4% complication rate was observed in Australia (N = 5, 3x bile leak, 1x postoperative bleeding and 1x wound infection) as opposed to 3% in Germany (N = 7, 2x bile leak, 2x postoperative bleeding and 3x wound infection). Postoperative length of stay in Australia was 1.8 +/- 0.1 days (median 1 day) and was significantly longer in patients after emergency surgery (1.6 +/- 0.1 versus 2.6 +/- 0.3 days, p < 0.018). Postoperative length of stay in Germany was 3.7 +/- 0.2 days (median 3 days), and no significant differences were observed when elective and emergency procedures were compared (3.5 +/- 0.2 versus 3.9 +/- 0.5 days, p > 0.05). Comparison of treatment results indicates a significantly shorter postoperative stay in Australia (3 days versus 1 day, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION/
CONCLUSION: In rural Australia, a median postoperative stay of 1 day after laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely achieved. Postoperative length of stay is significantly longer in the German setting with otherwise comparable patients and surgical techniques. Simple changes of pre- and postoperative management of elective as well as emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy will allow, for substantial cost savings, for the German health system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937339     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-009-0569-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  15 in total

1.  Gallstone surgery in German university hospitals. Development, complications and changing strategies.

Authors:  T P Hüttl; C Hrdina; H J Krämling; F W Schildberg; G Meyer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  The status of laparoscopic surgery in Australia.

Authors:  D Hailey; N Hirsch
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  U Maestroni; D Sortini; C Devito; F Pour Morad Kohan Brunaldi; G Anania; L Pavanelli; A Pasqualucci; A Donini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  [S3-guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and German Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract].

Authors:  F Lammert; M W Neubrand; R Bittner; H Feussner; L Greiner; F Hagenmüller; K H Kiehne; K Ludwig; H Neuhaus; G Paumgartner; J F Riemann; T Sauerbruch
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 6.  Prevalence of gallstones in sonographic surveys worldwide.

Authors:  W Kratzer; R A Mason; V Kächele
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 0.910

7.  Acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preferred treatment for acute biliary disease.

Authors:  Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Heather Short; Garth H Poole; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 8.  The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Systemic immune response after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Y-J Boo; W-B Kim; J Kim; T-J Song; S-Y Choi; Y-C Kim; S-O Suh
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Economic evaluation comparing From Home To Operation same day admission and preoperative admission one day prior to the surgery process: a randomized, controlled trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Keränen; E J O Soini; O-P Ryynänen; K Hietaniemi; U Keränen
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.580

View more
  2 in total

1.  Local adaptations aid establishment of laparoscopic surgery in a semiurban Nigerian hospital.

Authors:  Adewale O Adisa; Oladejo O Lawal; OlukaYode A Arowolo; Olusegun I Alatise
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Fabian Grass; Matthieu Cachemaille; Catherine Blanc; Nicolas Fournier; Nermin Halkic; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.