Literature DB >> 11735013

Gallstone surgery in German university hospitals. Development, complications and changing strategies.

T P Hüttl1, C Hrdina, H J Krämling, F W Schildberg, G Meyer.   

Abstract

A representative anonymous questionnaire was sent to all German university hospitals ( n=45) to address the development and outcome of laparoscopic gallstone surgery between 1991 and 1998. The response rate was 64%, and 28,753 operations for gallstone disease were analysed. Two-thirds of the procedures (67%) were performed laparoscopically. While a significant decrease of surgical complications (1991 vs 1998: 5.4% vs 3.4%; P<0.001) and re-laparotomy rate (1.0% vs 0.5%, P<0.05) was observed, no significant changes were detected with regard to the mortality rate. A learning curve regarding common bile duct (CBD) injuries was detected, showing a significant increase between 1991 and 1994 (0.3% and 0.7%, respectively, P<0.05) and a decrease to 0.2% in 1995 and 1996 ( P<0.05). The use of intraoperative cholangiography is compulsory in 10%, selective in 52%, while 38% of the university hospitals never use it. Most institutions use the Veress needle for pneumoperitoneum installation, and 93% use hook cautery for dissection. Since 1998, 45% of all institutions have also used the harmonic scalpel. The spectrum of indications for laparoscopic procedures has increased with time since acute cholecystitis, CBD stones and adhesions are not considered a general reason for a primary open approach. Our findings confirm a learning curve with regard to postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This observation may be due to better training as well as surgical experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735013     DOI: 10.1007/s004230100249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.

Authors:  Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  [Common bile duct stones. Diagnostic and therapeutic management].

Authors:  S Förster; E Klar
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--comparison of early postoperative results in an Australian rural centre and a German university hospital.

Authors:  Matthias W Wichmann; Reinhold Lang; Eben Beukes; Shaukat T Esufali; Karl-Walter Jauch; Tanyia K Hüttl; Thomas P Hüttl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  [Gallbladder calculi--always an indication for surgery?].

Authors:  R Bittner; M Ulrich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Mini-cholecystectomy: a personal series in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  P Watanapa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.