Literature DB >> 19937273

Optimization of square-wave electroporation for transfection of porcine fetal fibroblasts.

Jason W Ross1, Jeffrey J Whyte, Jianguo Zhao, Melissa Samuel, Kevin D Wells, Randall S Prather.   

Abstract

Development of a transgenic porcine biomedical research model requires effective delivery of DNA into the donor cell followed by selection of genetically modified somatic cell lines to be used for nuclear transfer. The objective of the current study was 2-fold: (1) to compare the effectiveness of a single 1 ms pulse of different voltages (V; 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350) and multiple 1 ms pulses (1, 2, 3, 4 or 5) at 300 V for delivery and expression of super-coiled GFP vector in surviving cells of three fetal fibroblast cell lines, and (2) to determine the ability of these electroporation parameters to produce stably transfected fibroblast colonies following G418 selection. Cell line (P < 0.001) and voltage (P < 0.001) affected DNA delivery into the cell as assessed by GFP expression while survival at 24 h was affected by voltage (P < 0.001) and not by cell line (P = 0.797). Using a single pulse while increasing voltage resulted in the percentage of GFP expressing cells increasing from 3.2 +/- 0.8% to 43.0 +/- 3.4% while survival decreased from 90.5 +/- 8.0% to 44.8 +/- 2.0%. The number of pulses at 300 V significantly affected survival (P < 0.001) and GFP expression (P < 0.001). Survival steadily decreased following 1-5 pulses from 63.2 +/- 6.3% to 3.0 +/- 0.3% with GFP expression of surviving cells increasing from 35.6 +/- 2.67% to 71.4 +/- 6.1%. Electroporation of a selectable marker at a 1:1 copy number ratio to a co-electroporated transgene resulted in 83% of G418 resistant colonies also being PCR positive for the secondary transgene. These electroporation conditions, specifically, three 1 ms pulses of 300 V to 200 muL of 1 x 10(6) cells/mL in the presence of 12.5 mug DNA/mL effectively introduced DNA into somatic cells. The utilization of these conditions produced numerous transgenic fibroblast colonies following G418 selection that when used for somatic cell nuclear transfer resulted in the production of live offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937273      PMCID: PMC2894267          DOI: 10.1007/s11248-009-9345-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  21 in total

1.  Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors.

Authors:  Liangxue Lai; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2003

2.  Electroporation in 'intracellular' buffer increases cell survival.

Authors:  M J van den Hoff; A F Moorman; W H Lamers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  K W Park; H T Cheong; L Lai; G S Im; B Kühholzer; A Bonk; M Samuel; A Rieke; B N Day; C N Murphy; D B Carter; R S Prather
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.282

4.  Direct evidence that transgene integration is random in murine cells, implying that naturally occurring double-strand breaks may be distributed similarly within the genome.

Authors:  G Dellaire; P Chartrand
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Targeted disruption of the alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in cloned pigs.

Authors:  Yifan Dai; Todd D Vaught; Jeremy Boone; Shu-Hung Chen; Carol J Phelps; Suyapa Ball; Jeff A Monahan; Peter M Jobst; Kenneth J McCreath; Ashley E Lamborn; Jamie L Cowell-Lucero; Kevin D Wells; Alan Colman; Irina A Polejaeva; David L Ayares
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  A novel method for the production of transgenic cloned pigs: electroporation-mediated gene transfer to non-cultured cells and subsequent selection with puromycin.

Authors:  Satoshi Watanabe; Masaki Iwamoto; Shun-ichi Suzuki; Daiichiro Fuchimoto; Daisuke Honma; Takashi Nagai; Michiko Hashimoto; Satoko Yazaki; Masahiro Sato; Akira Onishi
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Significant improvement in cloning efficiency of an inbred miniature pig by histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment after somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jianguo Zhao; Jason W Ross; Yanhong Hao; Lee D Spate; Eric M Walters; Melissa S Samuel; August Rieke; Clifton N Murphy; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Production of nuclear transfer-derived piglets using porcine fetal fibroblasts transfected with the enhanced green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Sanghwan Hyun; Gabsang Lee; Daeyoung Kim; Hyesoo Kim; Sohyun Lee; Donghyun Nam; Yeonwoo Jeong; Sue Kim; Soocheong Yeom; Sungkeun Kang; Jaeyong Han; Byeongchun Lee; Woosuk Hwang
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Transgenic pig expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein produced by nuclear transfer using colchicine-treated fibroblasts as donor cells.

Authors:  Liangxue Lai; Kwang-Wook Park; Hee-Tae Cheong; Birgit Kühholzer; Melissa Samuel; Aaron Bonk; Gi-Sun Im; August Rieke; Billy N Day; Clifton N Murphy; David B Carter; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.609

10.  Production of alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase-knockout cloned pigs expressing human alpha 1,2-fucosylosyltransferase.

Authors:  Jagdeece J Ramsoondar; Zoltán Macháty; Cristina Costa; Barry L Williams; William L Fodor; Kenneth R Bondioli
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 4.285

View more
  25 in total

1.  Vascular endothelium-specific overexpression of human catalase in cloned pigs.

Authors:  J J Whyte; M Samuel; E Mahan; J Padilla; G H Simmons; A A Arce-Esquivel; S B Bender; K M Whitworth; Y H Hao; C N Murphy; E M Walters; R S Prather; M H Laughlin
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  Genetic modifications of pigs for medicine and agriculture.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Whyte; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.609

3.  Nanomagnetic activation as a way to control the efficacy of nucleic acid delivery.

Authors:  Bartosz F Grześkowiak; Yolanda Sánchez-Antequera; Edelburga Hammerschmid; Markus Döblinger; Dietmar Eberbeck; Anna Woźniak; Ryszard Słomski; Christian Plank; Olga Mykhaylyk
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Generation of an inbred miniature pig model of retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Jason W Ross; Juan P Fernandez de Castro; Jianguo Zhao; Melissa Samuel; Eric Walters; Cecilia Rios; Patricia Bray-Ward; Bryan W Jones; Robert E Marc; Wei Wang; Liang Zhou; Jennifer M Noel; Maureen A McCall; Paul J DeMarco; Randall S Prather; Henry J Kaplan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Disruption of the Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) gene in pigs using ssDNA.

Authors:  Monique A Lorson; Lee D Spate; Melissa S Samuel; Clifton N Murphy; Christian L Lorson; Randall S Prather; Kevin D Wells
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Gene targeting with zinc finger nucleases to produce cloned eGFP knockout pigs.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Whyte; Jianguo Zhao; Kevin D Wells; Melissa S Samuel; Kristin M Whitworth; Eric M Walters; M Harold Laughlin; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Not All SCID Pigs Are Created Equally: Two Independent Mutations in the Artemis Gene Cause SCID in Pigs.

Authors:  Emily H Waide; Jack C M Dekkers; Jason W Ross; Raymond R R Rowland; Carol R Wyatt; Catherine L Ewen; Alyssa B Evans; Dinesh M Thekkoot; Nicholas J Boddicker; Nick V L Serão; N Matthew Ellinwood; Christopher K Tuggle
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Engineering Large Animal Species to Model Human Diseases.

Authors:  Christopher S Rogers
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-01

9.  Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Kiho Lee; Joshua A Benne; Benjamin P Beaton; Lee D Spate; Stephanie L Murphy; Melissa S Samuel; Jiude Mao; Chad O'Gorman; Eric M Walters; Clifton N Murphy; John Driver; Alan Mileham; David McLaren; Kevin D Wells; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  Transgenic pig carrying green fluorescent proteasomes.

Authors:  Edward L Miles; Chad O'Gorman; Jianguo Zhao; Melissa Samuel; Eric Walters; Young-Joo Yi; Miriam Sutovsky; Randall S Prather; Kevin D Wells; Peter Sutovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.