Literature DB >> 19937056

SNPs for a universal individual identification panel.

Andrew J Pakstis1, William C Speed, Rixun Fang, Fiona C L Hyland, Manohar R Furtado, Judith R Kidd, Kenneth K Kidd.   

Abstract

An efficient method to uniquely identify every individual would have value in quality control and sample tracking of large collections of cell lines or DNA as is now often the case with whole genome association studies. Such a method would also be useful in forensics. SNPs represent the best markers for such purposes. We have developed a globally applicable resource of 92 SNPs for individual identification (IISNPs) with extremely low probabilities of any two unrelated individuals from anywhere in the world having identical genotypes. The SNPs were identified by screening over 500 likely/candidate SNPs on samples of 44 populations representing the major regions of the world. All 92 IISNPs have an average heterozygosity [0.4 and the F(st) values are all\0.06 on our 44 populations making these a universally applicable panel irrespective of ethnicity or ancestry. No significant linkage disequilibrium (LD) occurs for all unique pairings of 86 of the 92 IISNPs (median LD = 0.011) in all of the 44 populations. The remaining 6 IISNPs show strong LD in most of the 44 populations for a small subset (7) of the unique pairings in which they occur due to close linkage. 45 of the 86 SNPs are spread across the 22 human autosomes and show very loose or no genetic linkage with each other. These 45 IISNPs constitute an excellent panel for individual identification including paternity testing with associated probabilities of individual genotypes less than 10(-15), smaller than achieved with the current panels of forensic markers. This panel also improves on an interim panel of 40 IISNPs previously identified using 40 population samples. The unlinked status of the subset of 45 SNPs we have identified also makes them useful for situations involving close biological relationships. Comparisons with random sets of SNPs illustrate the greater discriminating power, efficiency, and more universal applicability of this IISNP panel to populations around the world. The full set of 86 IISNPs that do not show LD can be used to provide even smaller genotype match probabilities in the range of 10(-31)-10(-35) based on the 44 population samples studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19937056     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-009-0771-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  14 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A new 39-plex analysis method for SNPs including 15 blood group loci.

Authors:  Sachiyo Inagaki; Yuji Yamamoto; Yusuke Doi; Tomoyo Takata; Takaki Ishikawa; Kiyomi Imabayashi; Kei Yoshitome; Satoru Miyaishi; Hideo Ishizu
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Population genetics of a functional variant of the dopamine beta-hydroxylase gene (DBH).

Authors:  J F Cubells; K Kobayashi; T Nagatsu; K K Kidd; J R Kidd; F Calafell; H R Kranzler; H Ichinose; J Gelernter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-07-25

4.  Selection of twenty-four highly informative SNP markers for human identification and paternity analysis in Koreans.

Authors:  Hwan Young Lee; Myung Jin Park; Ji-Eun Yoo; Ukhee Chung; Gil-Ro Han; Kyoung-Jin Shin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals.

Authors:  Kenneth K Kidd; Andrew J Pakstis; William C Speed; Elena L Grigorenko; Sylvester L B Kajuna; Nganyirwa J Karoma; Selemani Kungulilo; Jong-Jin Kim; Ru-Band Lu; Adekunle Odunsi; Friday Okonofua; Josef Parnas; Leslie O Schulz; Olga V Zhukova; Judith R Kidd
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  A multiplex assay with 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms for human identification.

Authors:  Juan J Sanchez; Chris Phillips; Claus Børsting; Kinga Balogh; Magdalena Bogus; Manuel Fondevila; Cheryl D Harrison; Esther Musgrave-Brown; Antonio Salas; Denise Syndercombe-Court; Peter M Schneider; Angel Carracedo; Niels Morling
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Candidate SNPs for a universal individual identification panel.

Authors:  Andrew J Pakstis; William C Speed; Judith R Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping.

Authors:  B Devlin; N Risch
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-09-20       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Ancestry analysis in the 11-M Madrid bomb attack investigation.

Authors:  Christopher Phillips; Lourdes Prieto; Manuel Fondevila; Antonio Salas; Antonio Gómez-Tato; José Alvarez-Dios; Antonio Alonso; Alejandro Blanco-Verea; María Brión; Marta Montesino; Angel Carracedo; María Victoria Lareu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Large-scale SNP analysis reveals clustered and continuous patterns of human genetic variation.

Authors:  Mark D Shriver; Rui Mei; Esteban J Parra; Vibhor Sonpar; Indrani Halder; Sarah A Tishkoff; Theodore G Schurr; Sergev I Zhadanov; Ludmila P Osipova; Tom D Brutsaert; Jonathan Friedlaender; Lynn B Jorde; W Scott Watkins; Michael J Bamshad; Gerardo Gutierrez; Halina Loi; Hajime Matsuzaki; Rick A Kittles; George Argyropoulos; Jose R Fernandez; Joshua M Akey; Keith W Jones
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.639

View more
  55 in total

1.  Coding SNPs as intrinsic markers for sample tracking in large-scale transcriptome studies.

Authors:  Weihong Xu; Hong Gao; Junhee Seok; Julie Wilhelmy; Michael N Mindrinos; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  Genotyping of 75 SNPs using arrays for individual identification in five population groups.

Authors:  Hsiao-Lin Hwa; Lawrence Shih Hsin Wu; Chun-Yen Lin; Tsun-Ying Huang; Hsiang-I Yin; Li-Hui Tseng; James Chun-I Lee
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Quantification of private information leakage from phenotype-genotype data: linking attacks.

Authors:  Arif Harmanci; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Single nucleotide polymorphism typing with massively parallel sequencing for human identification.

Authors:  Seung Bum Seo; Jonathan L King; David H Warshauer; Carey P Davis; Jianye Ge; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Massively parallel sequencing of forensically relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms using TruSeq™ forensic amplicon.

Authors:  David H Warshauer; Carey P Davis; Cydne Holt; Yonmee Han; Paulina Walichiewicz; Tom Richardson; Kathryn Stephens; Anne Jager; Jonathan King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  The QIAGEN 140-locus single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel for forensic identification using massively parallel sequencing (MPS): an evaluation and a direct-to-PCR trial.

Authors:  I Avent; A G Kinnane; N Jones; I Petermann; R Daniel; M E Gahan; D McNevin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  An alternate workflow for preparing Precision ID Ancestry and Identity Panel libraries for Illumina sequencing.

Authors:  Melissa Kr Scheible; Emma K Timpano; Laura M Boggs; Kelly A Meiklejohn
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  A single nucleotide polymorphism panel for individual identification and ancestry assignment in Caucasians and four East and Southeast Asian populations using a machine learning classifier.

Authors:  Hsiao-Lin Hwa; Ming-Yih Wu; Chih-Peng Lin; Wei Hsin Hsieh; Hsiang-I Yin; Tsui-Ting Lee; James Chun-I Lee
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 9.  Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy.

Authors:  Yaniv Erlich; Arvind Narayanan
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 10.  Short tandem repeat profiling: part of an overall strategy for reducing the frequency of cell misidentification.

Authors:  Raymond W Nims; Greg Sykes; Karin Cottrill; Pranvera Ikonomi; Eugene Elmore
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.