Literature DB >> 19936587

Does biventricular pacing improve hemodynamics in children undergoing routine congenital heart surgery?

Aamir Jeewa1, Alexander F Pitfield, James E Potts, Wendy Soulikias, Eustace S DeSouza, A J Hollinger, George G S Sandor, Jacques G LeBlanc, Andrew M Campbell, Shubhayan Sanatani.   

Abstract

Biventricular (BiV) pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for heart failure in adults. In children, cardiac dyssynchrony occurs most commonly following repair of congenital heart disease (CHD) where multisite pacing has been shown to improve both hemodynamics and ventricular function. Determining which patient types would specifically benefit has not yet been established. A prospective, repeated measures design was undertaken to evaluate BiV pacing in a cohort of children undergoing biventricular repair for correction of their CHD. Hemodynamics, arterial blood gas, electrocardiographic (ECG), and echocardiographic data were collected. Pacing protocol was undertaken prior to the patient's extubation with 20 min of conventional right ventricular (RV) or BiV pacing, preceded and followed by 10 min of recovery time. Multivariate statistics were used to analyze the data with p values <0.05 considered significant. Twenty-five (14 female) patients underwent surgery at a median (range) age of 5.2 (0.1-37.4) months with no early mortality. The Risk-adjusted classification for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS) scores were 2 in 14 patients, 3 in eight patients, and 4 in three patients. None had pre-existing arrhythmias, dyssynchrony, or required pacing pre-operatively. No patient required implantation of a permanent pacemaker post-operatively. The median cardio-pulmonary bypass time was 96 (55-236) min. RV and BiV pacing did not improve cardiac index from baseline (3.23 vs. 3.42 vs. 3.39 L/min/m2; p > 0.05). The QRS duration was not changed with pacing (100 vs. 80 vs. 80 ms; p > 0.05). On echocardiography, the time-to-peak velocity difference between the septal and posterior walls (synchrony) during pacing was similar to baseline and was also not statistically significant. BiV pacing did not improve cardiac output when compared to intrinsic sinus rhythm or RV pacing in this cohort of patients. Our study has shown that BiV pacing is not indicated in children who have undergone routine BiV congenital heart surgery. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the role of multisite pacing in children with ventricular dyssynchrony such as those with single ventricles, those undergoing reoperation or those with high RACHS scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19936587     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-009-9581-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  29 in total

1.  Echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular asynchrony predicts an acute hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ole A Breithardt; Christoph Stellbrink; Andrew P Kramer; Anil M Sinha; Andreas Franke; Rodney Salo; Bernhard Schiffgens; Etienne Huvelle; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Resynchronization in pediatrics who needs it?

Authors:  Anne M Dubin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Assessment of diastolic function with Doppler tissue imaging after cardiac surgery: effect of the "postoperative septum" in on-pump and off-pump procedures.

Authors:  Philip J Malouf; Michael Madani; Swaminatha Gurudevan; Thomas J Waltman; Ajit B Raisinghani; Anthony N DeMaria; Daniel G Blanchard
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Scar burden by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Evan C Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  The problem of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David H Birnie; Anthony Sl Tang
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  The benefits of biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with narrow QRS, NYHA class II and right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Kenneth Ng; Navin Kedia; David Martin; Patrick Tchou; Andrea Natale; Bruce Wilkoff; Randall Starling; Richard A Grimm
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Urgent cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure receiving inotropic therapy. A case series.

Authors:  Yuval Konstantino; Zaza Iakobishvili; Orna Arad; Tuvia Ben-Gal; Jairo Kusniec; Alexander Mazur; Avital Porter; Boris Strasberg; Alexander Battler; David Hasdai
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 1.869

8.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Disruption of the ventricular myocardial force-frequency relationship after cardiac surgery in children: noninvasive assessment by means of tissue Doppler imaging.

Authors:  Michael M H Cheung; Jeffrey F Smallhorn; Michael Vogel; Glen Van Arsdell; Andrew N Redington
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  The left ventricular apex is the optimal site for pediatric pacing: correlation with animal experience.

Authors:  Ward Y Vanagt; Xander A Verbeek; Tammo Delhaas; Luc Mertens; Willem J Daenen; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.