Literature DB >> 17338715

The benefits of biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with narrow QRS, NYHA class II and right ventricular pacing.

Kenneth Ng1, Navin Kedia, David Martin, Patrick Tchou, Andrea Natale, Bruce Wilkoff, Randall Starling, Richard A Grimm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify subgroups of heart failure patients who might benefit from biventricular pacing.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves the quality of life, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and exercise capacity and decreases hospitalizations for heart failure for patients who have severe heart failure and a wide QRS. It is unclear if other populations of heart failure patients would benefit from CRT.
METHODS: One hundred forty-four consecutive heart failure patients who underwent CRT and completed 3 months of follow-up were reviewed. Demographic, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcome data were analyzed to assess the relationship of functional class and QRS duration before device implantation to postimplant outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 20, 88, and 36 patients in NYHA functional class II, III, and IV, respectively. Thirty-four patients had right ventricular pacing and another 29 patients had a QRS duration < or = 150 ms. Patients who were in NYHA functional class II at baseline had significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and indices of left ventricular remodeling after CRT. Similar significant findings were seen in the subgroup with right ventricular pacing at baseline after CRT. However, in the subgroup with a narrow QRS duration, there were no significant changes in the indices of left ventricular remodeling or in the NYHA functional class and there was a significant increase in the QRS duration. For the study cohort as a whole, an improvement in NYHA functional class after CRT correlated with a significant decrease in adverse clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients who were in NYHA functional class II and those with right ventricular pacing appeared to benefit from CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17338715     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00649.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  Does biventricular pacing improve hemodynamics in children undergoing routine congenital heart surgery?

Authors:  Aamir Jeewa; Alexander F Pitfield; James E Potts; Wendy Soulikias; Eustace S DeSouza; A J Hollinger; George G S Sandor; Jacques G LeBlanc; Andrew M Campbell; Shubhayan Sanatani
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Presence of mechanical dyssynchrony in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Kan N Hor; Janaka P Wansapura; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; William M Gottliebson; Michael D Taylor; Richard J Czosek; Sherif F Nagueh; Nandakishore Akula; Eugene S Chung; Woodrow D Benson; Wojciech Mazur
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 3.  Are there real benefits to implanting cardiac devices in patients with end-stage dilated dystrophinopathic cardiomyopathy? Review of literature and personal results.

Authors:  Alberto Palladino; Andrea A Papa; Salvatore Morra; Vincenzo Russo; Manuela Ergoli; Anna Rago; Chiara Orsini; Gerardo Nigro; Luisa Politano
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2019-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.