| Literature DB >> 19936536 |
Estevam Rubens Utumi1, Andréia Perrella, Marco Antonio Portela Albuquerque, Carlos Alberto Adde, Rodney Garcia Rocha, Marcelo Gusmão Paraíso Cavalcanti.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Conventional radiography has shown limitation in acquiring image of the ATM region, thus, computed tomography (CT) scanning has been the best option to the present date for diagnosis, surgical planning and treatment of bone lesions, owing to its specific properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19936536 PMCID: PMC4327684 DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000500030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
FIGURE 1Classification of the head of the mandible by region
FIGURE 2Views of the simulated lesions in different regions of the head of the mandible, (A) superior, (B and C) medial, (D) superior
FIGURE 3Multiplanar reconstructed (MPR) images: (A) axial, (B) coronal, and (C) sagittal, in bone window
FIGURE 4A-Parasagittal landmarks in the lateral-medial direction; B- Parasagittal landmarks in the anterior-posterior direction
FIGURE 5Parasagittal reconstructed images of the right side of the mandible
Table of axial, coronal, sagittal images in comparison intra-observer, inter-observer with gold standard
| Kappa | Medial | Lateral | Anterior | Posterior | Superior |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs1 | 0.42 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.63 |
| p | 0.003 | < 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Obs1′ | 0.52 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.90 |
| p | 0.002 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Obs2 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| p | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Obs 1- First analysis of observer 1. Obs 1′- Second analysis of observer 1.
Table of parasagittal images in comparison intra-observer, inter-observer with gold standard
| Kappa | Medial | Lateral | Anterior | Posterior | Superior |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs1 | 0.37 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.79 |
| p | 0.004 | < 0,001 | < 0,001 | 0,001 | < 0,001 |
| Obs1′ | 0.64 | 0,73 | 0,77 | 0,81 | 0,90 |
| p | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | <0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Obs2 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| p | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Obs 1- First analysis of observer 1. Obs 1′- Second analysis of observer 1.
Table of the values of sensibility and specificity
| Reconstruction | Sensibility | Medial | Lateral | Anterior | Posterior | Superior |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axial, Coronal and Sagittal | Obs1 | 68.0 | 90.9 | 66.7 | 87.0 | 91.3 |
| Obs2 | 80.0 | 90.9 | 81.0 | 91.3 | 91,3 | |
| Parasagittal | Obs1 | 64.0 | 90.9 | 76.2 | 78.3 | 100,0 |
| Obs2 | 92.0 | 90.9 | 90.5 | 91.3 | 100.0 | |
| Specificity | ||||||
| Axial, Coronal and Sagittal | Obs1 | 100.0 | 87.5 | 88.9 | 71.4 | 71.4 |
| Obs2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | |
| Parasagittal | Obs1 | 100.0 | 87.5 | 100.0 | 85.7 | 71.4 |
| Obs2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 71.4 | 57.1 | |