| Literature DB >> 19936199 |
Hideki Ishii1, Tetsuya Amano, Tatsuaki Matsubara, Toyoaki Murohara.
Abstract
In recent years, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a well-established technique for the treatment of coronary artery disease. PCI improves symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease and it has been increasing safety of procedures. However, peri- and post-procedural myocardial injury, including angiographical slow coronary flow, microvascular embolization, and elevated levels of cardiac enzyme, such as creatine kinase and troponin-T and -I, has also been reported even in elective cases. Furthermore, myocardial reperfusion injury at the beginning of myocardial reperfusion, which causes tissue damage and cardiac dysfunction, may occur in cases of acute coronary syndrome. Because patients with myocardial injury is related to larger myocardial infarction and have a worse long-term prognosis than those without myocardial injury, it is important to prevent myocardial injury during and/or after PCI in patients with coronary artery disease. To date, many studies have demonstrated that adjunctive pharmacological treatment suppresses myocardial injury and increases coronary blood flow during PCI procedures. In this review, we highlight the usefulness of pharmacological treatment in combination with PCI in attenuating myocardial injury in patients with coronary artery disease.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; myocardial injury; percutaneous coronary intervention; pharmacology.
Year: 2008 PMID: 19936199 PMCID: PMC2780824 DOI: 10.2174/157340308785160598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Cardiol Rev ISSN: 1573-403X
Adjunctive Pharmacological Therapy in Combination with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
| Cardioprotective Strategy and Trial | No. of Patients | Detail of Study | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPIC [ | 2099 | A bolus and an infusion of placebo, a bolus of abciximab and an infusion of placebo, or a bolus and an infusion of abciximab in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures | As compared with placebo, the abciximab bolus and infusion resulted in a 35 percent reduction in the rate of the adverse cardiac events (12.8% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.008), whereas a 10 percent reduction was observed with the abciximab bolus alone (12.8% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.43). |
| EPILOG [ | 2792 | Standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin (initial bolus of 100 U per kilogram of body weight); abciximab with low-dose, weight-adjusted heparin (initial bolus of 70 U per kilogram); or placebo with standard-dose, weight-adjusted heparin in patients undergoing urgent or elective PCI | Abciximab treatment, together with weight-adjusted heparin, markedly reduces the risk of acute ischemic complications in patients undergoing PCI. Although there were no significant differences among the groups in the risk of major bleeding, minor bleeding was more frequent among patients receiving abciximab with standard-dose heparin. |
| EPISTENT [ | 1587 | Treatment with abciximab (0·25 mg/kg before intervention, followed by an infusion of 0·125 µg/kg/min for 12 h) or placebo in patients undergoing stent implantation. | Abciximab (compared with placebo) significantly reduced the incidence of CK-MB elevation >3 times normal in those without any angiographic complications (6.5% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.007). |
| ADMIRAL [ | 300 | Abciximab (a bolus of 0·25 mg/kg before intervention, followed by a 12-hour infusion of 0·125 µg/kg/min) or placebo in patients with AMI | Treatment with abciximab significantly improved coronary patency before and after stenting in patients with AMI, compared to placebo administration (16.8% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.01 and 95.1% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.04, respectively). |
| Feldman, DN | 2504 | Bivalirudin (a 0.75-mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by an infusion of 1.75 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the PCI procedure) or abciximab (a 0.25-mg/kg bolus and a 0.125 µg/kg /min infusion for 12 hours) in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents | The incidence of cardiac adverse events was similar in the bivalirudin and heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor groups. There was a lower incidence of major (0.7% vs 1.9%, |
| Steinhubl, SR | 175 | Ticlopidine pretreatment: ≥3 days before the procedure, 1 to 2 days, or <1 day before stent implantation | Ticlopidine pretreatment of ≥ 3 days was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of non–Q-wave MI (unadjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval = 0.04 to 0.78, p = 0.01) compared with pretreatment of <3 days. |
| ADELINE pilot trial [ | 28 | Intracoronary 1 mg/min in the right coronary artery or 2 mg/min in the left coronary artery over a 10 minute period or placebo in patients undergoing elective PCI | There was a significant difference in CK-MB increase from baseline to 24 hours after the PCI between the adenosine treated and the control group (1.15 vs. 7.36 µg/l, p = 0.047). |
| Marzilli, M | 54 | Intracoronary adenosine (4 mg) or saline in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI | The no-reflow phenomenon was seen in 1 adenosine patient and in 7 saline patients (p = 0.02). A Q-waveMI developed in 59.3% of the adenosine group and in 85.2% of the saline group (p = 0.04). |
| Kurz, DJ | 100 | Intravenous nitroglycerin or placebo during 12 hours after stenting in patients with stable or unstable angina | The occurrence of minor myocardial necrosis was 5% in the nitroglycerin group and 22% in the placebo group (p = 0.036). |
| Amit, G | 98 | Nitroprusside (60 µg) selectively injected into the infarct-related artery, distal to the occlusion or placebo in ST-elevation AMI patients | Selective intracoronary administration of nitroprusside failed to improve myocardial perfusion, assessed by angiography or ECG. However, nitroprusside improved clinical outcomes at 6 months after PCI. |
| Murakami, M | 192 | Intravenous nicorandil (2 µg/kg/min administered just before PCI and continued for 6 hours) or control in patients undergoing elective coronary stenting | The incidence of CK-MB elevation after PCI was significantly lower in patients treated with nicorandil than in those without nicorandil (8.8% vs. 21.8%, p <0.05). The mean peak CK-MB level postprocedure was 13.4 IU in patients with nicorandil and 16.5 IU in those without nicorandil (p <0.01). |
| Kuwabara, Y | 48 | Intracoronary and intravenous nicorandil during PCI or control in patients undergoing elective PCI | Nicorandil improved the recovery of myocardial fatty acid utilization and cardiac function after PCI, quantitatively evaluated by means of iodine-123-beta-methyl-p-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid single photon emission computed tomography. |
| Ito, H | 81 | Intravenous nicorandil (6 mg for 24 hours after bolus injection at a dose of 4 mg) or control in patients with anterior AMI | The frequency of no reflow phenomenon detected by myocardial contrast echocardiography was significantly lower in the nicorandil group than in the control group (15% vs. 33%, p < 0.05). |
| Ishii, H | 368 | Intravenous 12 mg dose of nicorandil or placebo in patients with ST elevation AMI | Postprocedural TIMI 3 flow was obtained in 89.7% of the nicorandil group and in 81.4% of the placebo (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.09-3.65; p = 0.025). Corrected TIMI frame count was 21.0 ± 9.1 in the nicorandil group and 25.1 ± 14.1 in the placebo group (p = 0.0009). ST-segment resolution >50% was observed in 79.5% of the nicorandil group and in 61.2% of the placebo group (hazard ratio 2.45, 95% CI 1.54-3.90; p = 0.0002). |
| Sharma, SK | 1675 | Beta-blocker administration before PCI or no beta-blocker administration | The incidence of CK-MB elevation after PCI was significantly lower in patients on beta-blocker than in those without beta-blockers (13.2% vs. 22.1%, p <0.001). The mean peak CK-MB level postprocedure was 29 IU in patients on beta-blocker and 38 IU in those without beta-blockers (p <0.002). |
| Ellis, SG | 6200 | Beta-blocker administration before PCI or no beta-blocker administration | There was no difference in either maximum CK rise or maximum CK-MB rise after PCI between patients with and without beta-blocker after adjustment for significant differences in baseline characteristics. |
| Wang, FW | 150 | Propranolol (15 µg/kg) injected into the coronary artery through the dilatation catheter with the tip distal to the coronary lesion or placebo | The incidence of CK-MB elevation after PCI was seen in 17% of patients treated with propranolol and 36% of patients with placebo (p = 0.01). Patients in the propranolol group had lower incidence of troponin T elevation than patients in the placebo group (13% vs. 33%, p = 0.005). |
| Leesar, MA | 22 | Intracoronary 0.75 mg dose of enalaprilat or placebo in patients with chronic stable angina | In the placebo group, the ST-segment shift was greater during the first balloon inflation than during the second and third inflations, both on the intracoronary ECG (21.0 ± 2.8 mm vs. 13.0 ± 2.0 mm and 13.0 ± 2.0 mm, p < 0.05) and on the surface ECG (16.0 ± 4.0 mm vs. 10.0 ± 2.0 mm and 9.0 ± 2.0 mm, p < 0.05). |
| ARMYDA [ | 153 | Atorvastatin (40 mg/day) or placebo 7 days before elective PCI for chronic stable angina | The incidence of myocardial infarction by CK-MB determination was significantly lower in the atrvastatin group than in the placebo group (5% vs. 18%, p = 0.025). |
| Briguori, C | 451 | Statin administration at least 3 days before elective PCI or no statin administration | Median CK-MB peak after PCI was significantly lower in the statin group than in the control group (1.70 vs. 2.20 ng/ml, p = 0.015). The incidence of a large non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was also lower in the statin group (8.0% vs. 15.6%: odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval = 0.26-0.86, p = 0.012). |
| Ishii, H | 386 | Chronic statin therapy for ≥1 month before the onset of a first AMI or control | Patients in the statin group had a significantly lower maximum CK level (2300 vs. 3538 IU/ml, p = 0.015) and a lower corrected TIMI frame count (18.8 vs. 24.2, p = 0.017) than patients in the non-statin group. |
| Iwakura, K | 293 | Chronic statin treatment before admission for AMI or control | Patients in the statin group had lower incidence of the no-reflow detected by intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography than patients in the control (9.1% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.003). |