Literature DB >> 12076217

Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Patrick W J C Serruys1, Pim de Feyter, Carlos Macaya, Norbert Kokott, Jacques Puel, Matthias Vrolix, Angelo Branzi, Marcelo C Bertolami, Graham Jackson, Bradley Strauss, Bernhard Meier.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with excellent short-term improvements in ischemic symptoms, yet only three fifths of PCI patients at 5 years and one third of patients at 10 years remain free of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment with fluvastatin reduces MACE in patients who have undergone PCI. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 77 referral centers in Europe, Canada, and Brazil. PATIENTS: A total of 1677 patients (aged 18-80 years) recruited between April 1996 and October 1998 with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia following successful completion of their first PCI who had baseline total cholesterol levels between 135 and 270 mg/dL (3.5-7.0 mmol/L), with fasting triglyceride levels of less than 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with fluvastatin, 80 mg/d (n = 844), or matching placebo (n = 833) at hospital discharge for 3 to 4 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survival time free of MACE, defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or reintervention procedure, compared between the treatment and placebo groups.
RESULTS: Median time between PCI and first dose of study medication was 2.0 days, and median follow-up was 3.9 years. MACE-free survival time was significantly longer in the fluvastatin group (P =.01). One hundred eighty-one (21.4%) of 844 patients in the fluvastatin group and 222 (26.7%) of 833 patients in the placebo group had at least 1 MACE (relative risk [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.95; P =.01). This result was independent of baseline total cholesterol levels (above [RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.04] vs below [RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.57-1.02] the median). In subgroup analysis, the risk of MACE was reduced in patients with diabetes (n = 202; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97; P =.04) and in those with multivessel disease (n = 614; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; P =.01) who received fluvastatin compared with those who received placebo. There were no instances of creatine phosphokinase elevations 10 or more times the upper limit of normal or rhabdomyolysis in the fluvastatin group.
CONCLUSION: Fluvastatin treatment in patients with average cholesterol levels undergoing their first successful PCI significantly reduces the risk of major adverse cardiac events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12076217     DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.24.3215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  129 in total

1.  Use of Statins for Secondary Prevention.

Authors:  Antonios M. Xydakis; Peter H. Jones
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2003-02

2.  The use of lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jessica M Ma; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Uchenwa Genus; Vladimir Dzavik
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  New and emerging data from clinical trials of statins.

Authors:  John C LaRosa
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  [Statin therapy].

Authors:  Gerhart Hitzenberger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2003

Review 5.  Toxicity of antilipidemic agents: facts and fictions.

Authors:  Antonios M Xydakis; Peter H Jones
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Treating multivessel disease in the era of coated stents: conclusion.

Authors:  C Di Mario; H Griffiths
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  João Costa; Margarida Borges; Cláudio David; António Vaz Carneiro
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-03

Review 9.  Treatment of lipids and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Meta-analysis of large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Bernard M Y Cheung; Ian J Lauder; Chu-Pak Lau; Cyrus R Kumana
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.