OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether treating periodontal disease prevents preterm birth and other major complications of pregnancy. METHODS: This single-center trial was conducted across six obstetric sites in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Pregnant women identified by history to be at risk (n=3,737) were examined for periodontal disease. Approximately 1,000 women with periodontal disease were allocated at random to receive periodontal treatment commencing around 20 weeks of gestation (n=542) or 6 weeks after the pregnancy was completed (controls; n=540). The treatment included mechanical removal of oral biofilms together with oral hygiene instruction and motivation at a minimum of three weekly visits, with further visits if required. RESULTS: There were no differences between the control and treatment groups in preterm birth (9.3% compared with 9.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI 0.7-1.58], P=.81), birth weight (3,450 compared with 3,410 g, P=.12), preeclampsia (4.1% compared with 3.4%, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44-1.56, P=.55), or other obstetric endpoints. There were four unexplained stillbirths in the control group and no pregnancy losses in the treated group (P=.12). Measures of fetal and neonatal well-being were similar in the two groups, including abnormalities in fetal heart rate recordings (P=.26), umbilical artery flow studies (P=.96), and umbilical artery blood gas values (P=.37). The periodontal treatment was highly successful in improving health of the gums (P<.01). CONCLUSION: The evidence provided by the present study does not support the hypothesis that treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy in this population prevents preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, or preeclampsia. Periodontal treatment was not hazardous to the women or their pregnancies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00133926. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether treating periodontal disease prevents preterm birth and other major complications of pregnancy. METHODS: This single-center trial was conducted across six obstetric sites in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Pregnant women identified by history to be at risk (n=3,737) were examined for periodontal disease. Approximately 1,000 women with periodontal disease were allocated at random to receive periodontal treatment commencing around 20 weeks of gestation (n=542) or 6 weeks after the pregnancy was completed (controls; n=540). The treatment included mechanical removal of oral biofilms together with oral hygiene instruction and motivation at a minimum of three weekly visits, with further visits if required. RESULTS: There were no differences between the control and treatment groups in preterm birth (9.3% compared with 9.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI 0.7-1.58], P=.81), birth weight (3,450 compared with 3,410 g, P=.12), preeclampsia (4.1% compared with 3.4%, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44-1.56, P=.55), or other obstetric endpoints. There were four unexplained stillbirths in the control group and no pregnancy losses in the treated group (P=.12). Measures of fetal and neonatal well-being were similar in the two groups, including abnormalities in fetal heart rate recordings (P=.26), umbilical artery flow studies (P=.96), and umbilical artery blood gas values (P=.37). The periodontal treatment was highly successful in improving health of the gums (P<.01). CONCLUSION: The evidence provided by the present study does not support the hypothesis that treatment of periodontal disease during pregnancy in this population prevents preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, or preeclampsia. Periodontal treatment was not hazardous to the women or their pregnancies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00133926. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Authors: Patricia Weidlich; Carlos Heitor C Moreira; Tiago Fiorini; Marta L Musskopf; José M da Rocha; Maria Lucia R Oppermann; Anne M Aass; Per Gjermo; Cristiano Susin; Cassiano K Rösing; Rui V Oppermann Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Jin Xiao; Naemah Alkhers; Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; Ronald J Billings; Tong Tong Wu; Daniel A Castillo; Linda Rasubala; Hans Malmstrom; Yanfang Ren; Eli Eliav Journal: Caries Res Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Nawel Taghzouti; Xu Xiong; Mervyn Gornitsky; Fatiha Chandad; René Voyer; Guy Gagnon; Line Leduc; Hairong Xu; Togas Tulandi; Bin Wei; Julie Sénécal; Ana M Velly; Mohammad H Salah; William D Fraser Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 6.993