Literature DB >> 19935019

Endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women using estradiol-progestin therapy.

Susanna Jaakkola1, Heli Lyytinen, Eero Pukkala, Olavi Ylikorkala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of endometrial cancer in all Finnish postmenopausal women using various forms of estradiol-progestin therapy.
METHODS: All Finnish women (aged more than 50 years) who had used estradiol-progestin therapy in 1994-2006 for at least 6 months (n=224,015) were identified from the national medical Reimbursement Registry and linked to the Finnish Cancer Registry. A total of 1,364 type I and 38 type II endometrial cancers were recorded by the end of 2006. The incidence of endometrial cancer in estradiol-progestin therapy users was compared with that in the general population in this cohort study.
RESULTS: The use of a continuous estradiol-progestin therapy regimen for 3 years or more was associated with a 76% reduction of the risk for type 1 cancer (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-60%). In contrast, the use of a sequential estradiol-progestin therapy regimen for at least 5 years was accompanied with a 69% elevation (95% CI 43-96%) if the progestin was added monthly, and with a significantly higher, 276% risk elevation (95% CI 190-379%) if progestin was added at 3-month intervals. Sequential regimens containing norethisterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate or dydrogesterone administered orally showed no significant differences in the endometrial safety. Oral and transdermal norethisterone acetate were associated with similar risk elevations. Women using a monthly sequential estradiol-progestin regimen tended to be diagnosed with endometrial cancer in an earlier stage than the background population.
CONCLUSION: Use of a continuous rather than a sequential estradiol-progestin regimen decreases the risk of endometrial cancer, whereas the route of administration or type of progestin does not differ in terms of endometrial cancer risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19935019     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bea950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of: The North American Menopause Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Is estrogen plus progestin menopausal hormone therapy safe with respect to endometrial cancer risk?

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Nicolas Wentzensen; Hannah P Yang; Mark E Sherman; Albert R Hollenbeck; Yikyung Park; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 4.  Risks, Benefits, and Treatment Modalities of Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Current Concepts.

Authors:  Jaya Mehta; Juliana M Kling; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Incidence and Trend of Type I and II Endometrial Cancer in Women from Two Population-Based European Cancer Registries (1998-2012).

Authors:  Daniel Ángel Rodríguez-Palacios; Sandra M Colorado-Yohar; Michel Velten; Ricardo J Vaamonde-Martín; Mónica Ballesta; María-Dolores Chirlaque
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Chinese Obstetrics & Gynecology journal club: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ilene K Tsui; William C Dodson; Allen R Kunselman; Hongying Kuang; Feng-Juan Han; Richard S Legro; Xiao-Ke Wu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.