Literature DB >> 19932997

Is denoising dead?

Priyam Chatterjee1, Peyman Milanfar.   

Abstract

Image denoising has been a well studied problem in the field of image processing. Yet researchers continue to focus attention on it to better the current state-of-the-art. Recently proposed methods take different approaches to the problem and yet their denoising performances are comparable. A pertinent question then to ask is whether there is a theoretical limit to denoising performance and, more importantly, are we there yet? As camera manufacturers continue to pack increasing numbers of pixels per unit area, an increase in noise sensitivity manifests itself in the form of a noisier image. We study the performance bounds for the image denoising problem. Our work in this paper estimates a lower bound on the mean squared error of the denoised result and compares the performance of current state-of-the-art denoising methods with this bound. We show that despite the phenomenal recent progress in the quality of denoising algorithms, some room for improvement still remains for a wide class of general images, and at certain signal-to-noise levels. Therefore, image denoising is not dead--yet.

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932997     DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2009.2037087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  9 in total

1.  Content-Aware Enhancement of Images With Filamentous Structures.

Authors:  Haris Jeelani; Haoyi Liang; Scott T Acton; Daniel S Weller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 2.  Patch-based models and algorithms for image processing: a review of the basic principles and methods, and their application in computed tomography.

Authors:  Davood Karimi; Rabab K Ward
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Model-based MR parameter mapping with sparsity constraints: parameter estimation and performance bounds.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Fan Lam; Zhi-Pei Liang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Statistical Models of Signal and Noise and Fundamental Limits of Segmentation Accuracy in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Theodore B Dubose; David Cunefare; Elijah Cole; Peyman Milanfar; Joseph A Izatt; Sina Farsiu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A new development of non-local image denoising using fixed-point iteration for non-convex ℓp sparse optimization.

Authors:  Shuting Cai; Kun Liu; Ming Yang; Jianliang Tang; Xiaoming Xiong; Mingqing Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Robust mean shift filter for mixed Gaussian and impulsive noise reduction in color digital images.

Authors:  Damian Kusnik; Bogdan Smolka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The risk of bias in denoising methods: Examples from neuroimaging.

Authors:  Kendrick Kay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Radiation Dose Reduction in Digital Mammography by Deep-Learning Algorithm Image Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Hak Hee Kim; Eunhee Kang; Bo Kyoung Seo; Nami Choi; Tae Hee Kim; You Jin Ku; Jong Chul Ye
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-12-11

9.  Hybrid regularizers-based adaptive anisotropic diffusion for image denoising.

Authors:  Kui Liu; Jieqing Tan; Liefu Ai
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.