Literature DB >> 19932733

Genotoxic thresholds, DNA repair, and susceptibility in human populations.

Gareth J S Jenkins1, Zoulikha Zaïr, George E Johnson, Shareen H Doak.   

Abstract

It has been long assumed that DNA damage is induced in a linear manner with respect to the dose of a direct acting genotoxin. Thus, it is implied that direct acting genotoxic agents induce DNA damage at even the lowest of concentrations and that no "safe" dose range exists. The linear (non-threshold) paradigm has led to the one-hit model being developed. This "one hit" scenario can be interpreted such that a single DNA damaging event in a cell has the capability to induce a single point mutation in that cell which could (if positioned in a key growth controlling gene) lead to increased proliferation, leading ultimately to the formation of a tumour. There are many groups (including our own) who, for a decade or more, have argued, that low dose exposures to direct acting genotoxins may be tolerated by cells through homeostatic mechanisms such as DNA repair. This argument stems from the existence of evolutionary adaptive mechanisms that allow organisms to adapt to low levels of exogenous sources of genotoxins. We have been particularly interested in the genotoxic effects of known mutagens at low dose exposures in human cells and have identified for the first time, in vitro genotoxic thresholds for several mutagenic alkylating agents (Doak et al., 2007). Our working hypothesis is that DNA repair is primarily responsible for these thresholded effects at low doses by removing low levels of DNA damage but becoming saturated at higher doses. We are currently assessing the roles of base excision repair (BER) and methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) for roles in the identified thresholds (Doak et al., 2008). This research area is currently important as it assesses whether "safe" exposure levels to mutagenic chemicals can exist and allows risk assessment using appropriate safety factors to define such exposure levels. Given human variation, the mechanistic basis for genotoxic thresholds (e.g. DNA repair) has to be well defined in order that susceptible individuals are considered. In terms of industrial exposures to known mutagens, knowing the dose relationships and protective mechanisms involved, offers the possibility of screening workers for susceptibility to mutation through examining DNA repair gene polymorphisms. Hence, thresholds may exist for certain mutagens, but there will undoubtedly be human subpopulations who are more at risk from low dose exposures than others and who should not be exposed, if possible. By studying polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, susceptible individuals may be identified, and additional safety factors appropriately targeted to these populations.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932733     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Dose and Time Dependence of Targeted and Untargeted Effects after Very Low Doses of α-Particle Irradiation of Human Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  A Belchior; O Monteiro Gil; P Almeida; P Vaz
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Complete protection against aflatoxin B(1)-induced liver cancer with a triterpenoid: DNA adduct dosimetry, molecular signature, and genotoxicity threshold.

Authors:  Natalie M Johnson; Patricia A Egner; Victoria K Baxter; Michael B Sporn; Ryan S Wible; Thomas R Sutter; John D Groopman; Thomas W Kensler; Bill D Roebuck
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-03-24

4.  Yeast grown in continuous culture systems can detect mutagens with improved sensitivity relative to the Ames test.

Authors:  Joseph Y Ong; Julia T Pence; David C Molik; Heather A M Shepherd; Holly V Goodson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Potential relationship between inadequate response to DNA damage and development of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Peishuai Chen; Jian Gu; Alexander J R Bishop; Linda M Scott; Paul Hasty; Vivienne I Rebel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Synergistic and Antagonistic Mutation Responses of Human MCL-5 Cells to Mixtures of Benzo[a]pyrene and 2-Amino-1-Methyl-6-Phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine: Dose-Related Variation in the Joint Effects of Common Dietary Carcinogens.

Authors:  Rhiannon David; Timothy Ebbels; Nigel Gooderham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  BPDE-induced genotoxicity: relationship between DNA adducts, mutagenicity in the in vitro PIG-A assay, and the transcriptional response to DNA damage in TK6 cells.

Authors:  Ann Liza Piberger; Christopher T Krüger; Bettina M Strauch; Beatrice Schneider; Andrea Hartwig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 3-alkylpyridine marine alkaloid analogs with promising anticancer activity.

Authors:  Alessandra Mirtes Marques Neves Gonçalves; Aline Brito de Lima; Maria Cristina da Silva Barbosa; Luiz Fernando de Camargos; Júlia Teixeira de Oliveira; Camila de Souza Barbosa; José Augusto Ferreira Perez Villar; André Carvalho Costa; Isabella Viana Gomes da Silva; Luciana Maria Silva; Fernando de Pilla Varotti; Fabio Vieira dos Santos; Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro Viana
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 9.  Thresholds of Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens.

Authors:  Takehiko Nohmi
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2018-10-15

10.  The clastogenicity of 4NQO is cell-type dependent and linked to cytotoxicity, length of exposure and p53 proficiency.

Authors:  Katja Brüsehafer; Bella B Manshian; Ann T Doherty; Zoulikha M Zaïr; George E Johnson; Shareen H Doak; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.