Literature DB >> 19931624

Comparative phylogeography of brown (Sula leucogaster) and red-footed boobies (S. sula): the influence of physical barriers and habitat preference on gene flow in pelagic seabirds.

J A Morris-Pocock1, T E Steeves, F A Estela, D J Anderson, V L Friesen.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that both physical and ecological barriers to gene flow drive population differentiation in tropical seabirds, we surveyed mitochondrial control region variation in 242 brown boobies (Sula leucogaster), which prefer inshore habitat, and 271 red-footed boobies (S. sula), which prefer pelagic habitat. To determine the relative influence of isolation and gene flow on population structure, we used both traditional methods and a recently developed statistical method based on coalescent theory and Bayesian inference (Isolation with Migration). We found that global population genetic structure was high in both species, and that female-mediated gene flow among ocean basins apparently has been restricted by major physical barriers including the Isthmus of Panama, and the periodic emergence of the Sunda and Sahul Shelves in Southeast Asia. In contrast, the evolutionary history of populations within ocean basins differed markedly between the two species. In brown boobies, we found high levels of population genetic differentiation and limited gene flow among colonies, even at spatial scales as small as 500km. Although red-footed booby colonies were also genetically differentiated within ocean basins, coalescent analyses indicated that populations have either diverged in the face of ongoing gene flow, or diverged without gene flow but recently made secondary contact. Regardless, gene flow among red-footed booby populations was higher than among brown booby populations. We suggest that these contrasting patterns of gene flow within ocean basins may be explained by the different habitat preferences of brown and red-footed boobies. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19931624     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  10 in total

1.  Contemporary and historical separation of transequatorial migration between genetically distinct seabird populations.

Authors:  Matt J Rayner; Mark E Hauber; Tammy E Steeves; Hayley A Lawrence; David R Thompson; Paul M Sagar; Sarah J Bury; Todd J Landers; Richard A Phillips; Louis Ranjard; Scott A Shaffer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Trans-oceanic host dispersal explains high seabird tick diversity on Cape Verde islands.

Authors:  E Gómez-Díaz; J A Morris-Pocock; J González-Solís; K D McCoy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  DNA Barcodes of Arabian Partridge and Philby's Rock Partridge: Implications for Phylogeny and Species Identification.

Authors:  Haseeb Ahmad Khan; Ibrahim Abdulwahid Arif; Mohammad Shobrak
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 1.625

4.  Population genetic structure of the land snail Camaena cicatricosa (Stylommatophora, Camaenidae) in China inferred from mitochondrial genes and ITS2 sequences.

Authors:  Weichuan Zhou; Haifang Yang; Hongli Ding; Shanping Yang; Junhong Lin; Pei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Geolocator tagging links distributions in the non-breeding season to population genetic structure in a sentinel North Pacific seabird.

Authors:  J Mark Hipfner; Marie M Prill; Katharine R Studholme; Alice D Domalik; Strahan Tucker; Catherine Jardine; Mark Maftei; Kenneth G Wright; Jessie N Beck; Russell W Bradley; Ryan D Carle; Thomas P Good; Scott A Hatch; Peter J Hodum; Motohiro Ito; Scott F Pearson; Nora A Rojek; Leslie Slater; Yutaka Watanuki; Alexis P Will; Aidan D Bindoff; Glenn T Crossin; Mark C Drever; Theresa M Burg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Extreme philopatry and genetic diversification at unprecedented scales in a seabird.

Authors:  D K Danckwerts; L Humeau; P Pinet; C D McQuaid; M Le Corre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Concerted evolution of duplicated mitochondrial control regions in three related seabird species.

Authors:  James A Morris-Pocock; Scott A Taylor; Tim P Birt; Vicki L Friesen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Philopatry drives genetic differentiation in an island archipelago: comparative population genetics of Galapagos Nazca boobies (Sula granti) and great frigatebirds (Fregata minor).

Authors:  Iris I Levin; Patricia G Parker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Phylogeographic structure of cotton pest Adelphocoris suturalis (Hemiptera: Miridae): strong subdivision in China inferred from mtDNA and rDNA ITS markers.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhang; Hu Li; Shujuan Li; Aibing Zhang; Fei Kou; Huaizhu Xun; Pei Wang; Ying Wang; Fan Song; Jianxin Cui; Jinjie Cui; Dawn H Gouge; Wanzhi Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The role of seabirds of the Iles Eparses as reservoirs and disseminators of parasites and pathogens.

Authors:  Karen D McCoy; Muriel Dietrich; Audrey Jaeger; David A Wilkinson; Matthieu Bastien; Erwan Lagadec; Thierry Boulinier; Hervé Pascalis; Pablo Tortosa; Matthieu Le Corre; Koussay Dellagi; Camille Lebarbenchon
Journal:  Acta Oecol (Montrouge)       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.674

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.