| Literature DB >> 26388034 |
Lijuan Zhang1,2, Hu Li1, Shujuan Li3, Aibing Zhang4, Fei Kou1, Huaizhu Xun1, Pei Wang5, Ying Wang6, Fan Song1, Jianxin Cui6, Jinjie Cui2, Dawn H Gouge7, Wanzhi Cai1.
Abstract
Phylogeographic patterns of some extant plant and vertebrate species have been well studied; however, they are poorly understood in the majority of insects. The study documents analysis of mitochondrial (COI, CYTB and ND5) and nuclear (5.8S rDNA, ITS2 and 28S rDNA) data from 419 individuals of Adelphocoris suturalis, which is one of the main cotton pests found in the 31 locations in China and Japan involved in the study. Results show that the species is highly differentiated between populations from central China and peripheral China regions. Analysis of molecular variance showed a high level of geographical differentiation at different hierarchical levels. Isolation-by-distance test showed no significant correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance among A. suturalis populations, which suggested gene flow is not restricted by distance. In seven peripheral populations, the high levels of genetic differentiation and the small Nem values implied that geographic barriers were more likely restrict gene flow. Neutrality tests and the Bayesian skyline plot suggested population expansion likely happened during the cooling transition between Last Interglacial and Last Glacial Maximum. All lines of evidence suggest that physical barriers, Pleistocene climatic oscillations and geographical heterogeneity have affected the population structure and distribution of this insect in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26388034 PMCID: PMC4585665 DOI: 10.1038/srep14009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Genetic diversity statistics for mtDNA data in Adelphocoris suturalis sampling populations.
| Population | Locality | Ht | π | K | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HJ region | ||||||
| HJ | Hokkaido, Japan | 39 | 10 | 0.8571 | 0.0043 | 8.8761 |
| PC region | ||||||
| ZHZ | Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China | 18 | 5 | 0.5619 | 0.0014 | 2.8571 |
| LX | Lanxi, Zhejiang, China | 20 | 6 | 0.7143 | 0.0035 | 7.0667 |
| GY | Guiyang, Guizhou, China | 5 | 6 | 0.8000 | 0.0005 | 1.0857 |
| SH | Suihua, Heilongjiang, China | 17 | 5 | 0.7429 | 0.0014 | 2.8191 |
| BB | Bengbu, Anhui, China | 21 | 9 | 0.8476 | 0.0040 | 8.2667 |
| JYC | Yancheng, Jiangsu, China | 24 | 8 | 0.8667 | 0.0044 | 8.8952 |
| ACZ | Chizhou, Anhui, China | 21 | 7 | 0.8191 | 0.0042 | 8.5143 |
| DZ | Dezhou, Shandong, China | 21 | 8 | 0.8762 | 0.0045 | 9.2762 |
| TL | Tieling, Liaoning, China | 16 | 4 | 0.6191 | 0.0027 | 5.6000 |
| LF | Langfang, Hebei, China | 20 | 7 | 0.7714 | 0.0039 | 8.0191 |
| CX | Cixi, Zhejiang, China | 17 | 3 | 0.2571 | 0.0011 | 2.2667 |
| BJ | Haidian, Beijing, China | 17 | 4 | 0.6381 | 0.0018 | 3.7524 |
| LN | Longnan, Gansu, China | 18 | 5 | 0.8222 | 0.0033 | 6.6444 |
| XCH | Xuancheng, Anhui, China | 18 | 5 | 0.9333 | 0.0048 | 9.8000 |
| TJ | Baodier, Tianjin, China | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| CC region | ||||||
| ZJ | Zhijiang, Hubei, China | 19 | 8 | 0.8762 | 0.0016 | 3.1810 |
| XC | Xuchang, Henan, China | 19 | 6 | 0.8381 | 0.0029 | 6.0000 |
| HS | Hengshui, Hebei, China | 22 | 9 | 0.8857 | 0.0031 | 6.3048 |
| JJ | Jiujiang, Jiangxi, China | 25 | 8 | 0.8667 | 0.0038 | 7.7333 |
| YY | Yueyang, Hunan, China | 23 | 8 | 0.8952 | 0.0040 | 8.1905 |
| XY | Xiangyang, Hubei, China | 23 | 10 | 0.9333 | 0.0036 | 7.2571 |
| NY | Nanyang, Henan, China | 19 | 7 | 0.8762 | 0.0025 | 5.1429 |
| WZ | Wuzhong, Ningxia, China | 19 | 6 | 0.6476 | 0.0031 | 6.3048 |
| SL | Shangluo, Shanxi, China | 8 | 7 | 0.8000 | 0.0008 | 1.5619 |
| PY | Puyang, Henan, China | 23 | 9 | 0.8857 | 0.0045 | 9.1048 |
| CD | Changde, Hunan, China | 23 | 10 | 0.9238 | 0.0035 | 7.2000 |
| QJ | Qianjiang, Hubei, China | 21 | 8 | 0.8667 | 0.0041 | 8.4381 |
| XX | Xinxiang, Henan, China | 19 | 8 | 0.8952 | 0.0041 | 8.3429 |
| WN | Weinan, Shanxi, China | 19 | 6 | 0.8889 | 0.0040 | 8.1111 |
| SY | Songyuan, Jilin, China | 18 | 2 | 1.0000 | 0.0088 | 18.0000 |
| Total | 107 | 95 | 0.8722 | 0.0044 | 8.9093 | |
S, number of segregating sites; Ht, the number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide difference.
Figure 1Fixation indices correspond to the number of groups (K) defined by SAMOVA analysis based on mtDNA (A) and ITS (B) data.
Figure 2Genetic barriers predicted by BARRER based on mtDNA data.
The genetic barriers are shown in red lines with arrows labeled from ‘a’ to ‘e’. Map was generated from http://ngcc.sbsm.gov.cn/ (Data of access: 18/03/2015).
Figure 3Haplotype network of Adelphocoris suturalis based on mtDNA data.
The circle size of haplotype denotes the number of observed individuals. Colors correspond to different regions. White circles represent intermediate haplotypes not observed.
Figure 4Haplotype network of Adelphocoris suturalis based on ITS data.
The circle size of haplotype denotes the number of observed individuals. Colors correspond to different regions. White circles represent intermediate haplotypes not observed.
Figure 5Demographic history of Adelphocoris suturalis reconstructed using Bayesian skyline plot based on mtDNA data.
X-axis is the timescale before present, and Y-axis is the estimated effective population size. Solid curves indicate median effective population size; the shaded range indicates 95% highest posterior density intervals. LGM represents Last Glacial Maximum, and LIG represents the Last Interglacial.
Figure 6Map of sampling localities of the Adelphocoris suturalis.
Different colors showed three groups defined by SAMOVA based on mitochondrial data (red color represents central group; green color represents peripheral group; blue color represents Hokkaido Japan group). Map was generated from http://ngcc.sbsm.gov.cn/ (Data of access: 18/03/2015).