Literature DB >> 22127637

4D-LQTA-QSAR and docking study on potent Gram-negative specific LpxC inhibitors: a comparison to CoMFA modeling.

Jahan B Ghasemi1, Reihaneh Safavi-Sohi, Euzébio G Barbosa.   

Abstract

A quasi 4D-QSAR has been carried out on a series of potent Gram-negative LpxC inhibitors. This approach makes use of the molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories and topology information retrieved from the GROMACS package. This new methodology is based on the generation of a conformational ensemble profile, CEP, for each compound instead of only one conformation, followed by the calculation intermolecular interaction energies at each grid point considering probes and all aligned conformations resulting from MD simulations. These interaction energies are independent variables employed in a QSAR analysis. The comparison of the proposed methodology to comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) formalism was performed. This methodology explores jointly the main features of CoMFA and 4D-QSAR models. Step-wise multiple linear regression was used for the selection of the most informative variables. After variable selection, multiple linear regression (MLR) and partial least squares (PLS) methods used for building the regression models. Leave-N-out cross-validation (LNO), and Y-randomization were performed in order to confirm the robustness of the model in addition to analysis of the independent test set. Best models provided the following statistics: [Formula in text] (PLS) and [Formula in text] (MLR). Docking study was applied to investigate the major interactions in protein-ligand complex with CDOCKER algorithm. Visualization of the descriptors of the best model helps us to interpret the model from the chemical point of view, supporting the applicability of this new approach in rational drug design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22127637     DOI: 10.1007/s11030-011-9340-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Divers        ISSN: 1381-1991            Impact factor:   2.943


  20 in total

1.  Design and synthesis of potent Gram-negative specific LpxC inhibitors.

Authors:  U Faruk Mansoor; Dilrukshi Vitharana; Panduranga Adulla Reddy; Dayna L Daubaras; Paul McNicholas; Peter Orth; Todd Black; M Arshad Siddiqui
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins.

Authors:  R D Cramer; D E Patterson; J D Bunce
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1988-08-01       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Zinc hydrolases: the mechanisms of zinc-dependent deacetylases.

Authors:  Marcy Hernick; Carol A Fierke
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 4.013

4.  LQTA-QSAR: a new 4D-QSAR methodology.

Authors:  João Paulo A Martins; Euzébio G Barbosa; Kerly F M Pasqualoto; Márcia M C Ferreira
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Predicting the predictability: a unified approach to the applicability domain problem of QSAR models.

Authors:  Horvath Dragos; Marcou Gilles; Varnek Alexandre
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  The spatial structure in liquid water.

Authors:  P G Kusalik; I M Svishchev
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  UDP-3-O-(R-3-hydroxymyristoyl)-N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase of Escherichia coli is a zinc metalloenzyme.

Authors:  J E Jackman; C R Raetz; C A Fierke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-02-09       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  Mechanism and inhibition of LpxC: an essential zinc-dependent deacetylase of bacterial lipid A synthesis.

Authors:  Adam W Barb; Pei Zhou
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.837

9.  High-throughput catch-and-release synthesis of oxazoline hydroxamates. Structure-activity relationships in novel inhibitors of Escherichia coli LpxC: in vitro enzyme inhibition and antibacterial properties.

Authors:  Michael C Pirrung; L Nathan Tumey; Amanda L McClerren; Christian R H Raetz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 10.  4D-QSAR: perspectives in drug design.

Authors:  Carolina H Andrade; Kerly F M Pasqualoto; Elizabeth I Ferreira; Anton J Hopfinger
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  5 in total

1.  Benzo[e]pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]diazepin-6(11H)-one derivatives as Aurora A kinase inhibitors: LQTA-QSAR analysis and detailed systematic validation of the developed model.

Authors:  Ashish M Kanhed; Radha Charan Dash; Nishant Parmar; Tarun Kumar Das; Rajani Giridhar; Mange Ram Yadav
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Molecular dynamics-guided receptor-dependent 4D-QSAR studies of HDACs inhibitors.

Authors:  Zhihao Hu; Qianxia Lin; Haiyun Liu; Tiansheng Zhao; Bowen Yang; Guogang Tu
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  A receptor dependent-4D QSAR approach to predict the activity of mutated enzymes.

Authors:  R Pravin Kumar; Naveen Kulkarni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Hierarchical Clustering and Target-Independent QSAR for Antileishmanial Oxazole and Oxadiazole Derivatives.

Authors:  Henrique R Teles; Leonardo L G Ferreira; Marilia Valli; Fernando Coelho; Adriano D Andricopulo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Two Decades of 4D-QSAR: A Dying Art or Staging a Comeback?

Authors:  Andrzej Bak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.