Literature DB >> 19929763

Action preparation helps and hinders perception of action.

Clare Press1, Elena Gherri, Cecilia Heyes, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

Several theories of the mechanisms linking perception and action require that the links are bidirectional, but there is a lack of consensus on the effects that action has on perception. We investigated this by measuring visual event-related brain potentials to observed hand actions while participants prepared responses that were spatially compatible (e.g., both were on the left side of the body) or incompatible and action type compatible (e.g., both were finger taps) or incompatible, with observed actions. An early enhanced processing of spatially compatible stimuli was observed, which is likely due to spatial attention. This was followed by an attenuation of processing for both spatially and action type compatible stimuli, likely to be driven by efference copy signals that attenuate processing of predicted sensory consequences of actions. Attenuation was not response-modality specific; it was found for manual stimuli when participants prepared manual and vocal responses, in line with the hypothesis that action control is hierarchically organized. These results indicate that spatial attention and forward model prediction mechanisms have opposite, but temporally distinct, effects on perception. This hypothesis can explain the inconsistency of recent findings on action-perception links and thereby supports the view that sensorimotor links are bidirectional. Such effects of action on perception are likely to be crucial, not only for the control of our own actions but also in sociocultural interaction, allowing us to predict the reactions of others to our own actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19929763     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

2.  The influence of action observation on action execution: Dissociating the contribution of action on perception, perception on action, and resolving conflict.

Authors:  Eliane Deschrijver; Jan R Wiersema; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Drawing sounds: representing tones and chords spatially.

Authors:  Alejandro Salgado-Montejo; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; Jorge A Alvarado; Juan Camilo Arboleda; Daniel R Suarez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Action intentions modulate allocation of visual attention: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Agnieszka Wykowska; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-04

6.  Imaging when acting: picture but not word cues induce action-related biases of visual attention.

Authors:  Agnieszka Wykowska; Bernhard Hommel; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-15

7.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23

8.  Effects of context on visuomotor interference depends on the perspective of observed actions.

Authors:  Marta Bortoletto; Jason B Mattingley; Ross Cunnington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Timecourse of mirror and counter-mirror effects measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea Cavallo; Cecilia Heyes; Cristina Becchio; Geoffrey Bird; Caroline Catmur
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Moving time: the influence of action on duration perception.

Authors:  Clare Press; Eva Berlot; Geoffrey Bird; Richard Ivry; Richard Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.