James Downar1, Laura Hawryluck. 1. Division of Palliative Care, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. james.downar@utoronto.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients and clinicians often find it difficult to discuss wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or "code status." Some authors have published effective communication styles, but there are currently no published guidelines for the content of a discussion about resuscitation or goals of care. METHODS: We identified a group of physicians with expertise in end-of-life care and communication, and used the Delphi method to develop a series of consensus statements about the ideal content of a discussion of CPR and goals of care. RESULTS: Twelve physicians agreed to participate in the study, generating nine consensus statements. These statements addressed the following topics: timing the discussion; framing the discussion in terms of "goals of care"; distinguishing between life-sustaining therapy (LST) and CPR; describing a cardiac arrest, LST, CPR, and palliative care; describing what happens after a cardiac arrest; how to modify the discussion to respect a patient's medical condition or beliefs; offering a prognosis; making a recommendation; and the importance of trust and rapport. There was consensus for each statement after the second Delphi round. INTERPRETATION: Physicians with expertise in end-of-life care and communication were able to develop consensus statements for the ideal content of a discussion of CPR and goals of care. These statements can serve as guidelines for physicians who feel uncomfortable with these discussions, in order to facilitate effective, informed, and ethically sound decision making.
BACKGROUND:Patients and clinicians often find it difficult to discuss wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or "code status." Some authors have published effective communication styles, but there are currently no published guidelines for the content of a discussion about resuscitation or goals of care. METHODS: We identified a group of physicians with expertise in end-of-life care and communication, and used the Delphi method to develop a series of consensus statements about the ideal content of a discussion of CPR and goals of care. RESULTS: Twelve physicians agreed to participate in the study, generating nine consensus statements. These statements addressed the following topics: timing the discussion; framing the discussion in terms of "goals of care"; distinguishing between life-sustaining therapy (LST) and CPR; describing a cardiac arrest, LST, CPR, and palliative care; describing what happens after a cardiac arrest; how to modify the discussion to respect a patient's medical condition or beliefs; offering a prognosis; making a recommendation; and the importance of trust and rapport. There was consensus for each statement after the second Delphi round. INTERPRETATION: Physicians with expertise in end-of-life care and communication were able to develop consensus statements for the ideal content of a discussion of CPR and goals of care. These statements can serve as guidelines for physicians who feel uncomfortable with these discussions, in order to facilitate effective, informed, and ethically sound decision making.
Authors: James Downar; Tracy Luk; Robert W Sibbald; Tatiana Santini; Joseph Mikhael; Hershl Berman; Laura Hawryluck Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Deborah A Morris; Kimberly S Johnson; Natalie Ammarell; Robert M Arnold; James A Tulsky; Karen E Steinhauser Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-05-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Roberto Forero; Geoff McDonnell; Blanca Gallego; Sally McCarthy; Mohammed Mohsin; Chris Shanley; Frank Formby; Ken Hillman Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 1.112
Authors: Kriti Mittal; Kapil Sharma; Neha Dangayach; Dhaval Raval; Katherine Leung; Susan George; George Abraham Journal: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Date: 2014-04-14