Literature DB >> 19928110

An iterative technique to segment PET lesions using a Monte Carlo based mathematical model.

S A Nehmeh1, H El-Zeftawy, C Greco, J Schwartz, Y E Erdi, A Kirov, C R Schmidtlein, A B Gyau, S M Larson, J L Humm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The need for an accurate lesion segmentation tool in 18FDG PET is a prerequisite for the estimation of lesion response to therapy, for radionuclide dosimetry, and for the application of 18FDG PET to radiotherapy planning. In this work, the authors have developed an iterative method based on a mathematical fit deduced from Monte Carlo simulations to estimate tumor segmentation thresholds.
METHODS: The GATE software, a GEANT4 based Monte Carlo tool, was used to model the GE Advance PET scanner geometry. Spheres ranging between 1 and 6 cm in diameters were simulated in a 10 cm high and 11 cm in diameter cylinder. The spheres were filled with water-equivalent density and simulated in both water and lung equivalent background. The simulations were performed with an infinite, 8/1, and 4/1 target-to-background ratio (T/B). A mathematical fit describing the correlation between the lesion volume and the corresponding optimum threshold value was then deduced through analysis of the reconstructed images. An iterative method, based on this mathematical fit, was developed to determine the optimum threshold value. The effects of the lesion volume and T/B on the threshold value were investigated. This method was evaluated experimentally using the NEMA NU2-2001 IEC phantom, the ACNP cardiac phantom, a randomly deformed aluminum can, and a spheroidal shape phantom implemented artificially in the lung, liver, and brain of patient PET images. Clinically, the algorithm was evaluated in six lesions from five patients. Clinical results were compared to CT volumes.
RESULTS: This mathematical fit predicts an existing relationship between the PET lesion size and the percent of maximum activity concentration within the target volume (or threshold). It also showed a dependence of the threshold value on the T/B, which could be eliminated by background subtraction. In the phantom studies, the volumes of the segmented PET targets in the PET images were within 10% of the nominal ones. Clinically, the PET target volumes were also within 10% of those measured from CT images.
CONCLUSIONS: This iterative algorithm enabled accurately segment PET lesions, independently of their contrast value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19928110     DOI: 10.1118/1.3222732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  15 in total

Review 1.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Respiratory-induced errors in tumor quantification and delineation in CT attenuation-corrected PET images: effects of tumor size, tumor location, and respiratory trace: a simulation study using the 4D XCAT phantom.

Authors:  Parham Geramifar; Mojtaba Shamsaie Zafarghandi; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Simultaneous cosegmentation of tumors in PET-CT images using deep fully convolutional networks.

Authors:  Zisha Zhong; Yusung Kim; Kristin Plichta; Bryan G Allen; Leixin Zhou; John Buatti; Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis systems for lung cancer: challenges and methodologies.

Authors:  Ayman El-Baz; Garth M Beache; Georgy Gimel'farb; Kenji Suzuki; Kazunori Okada; Ahmed Elnakib; Ahmed Soliman; Behnoush Abdollahi
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-01-29

5.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images.

Authors:  Brent Foster; Ulas Bagci; Awais Mansoor; Ziyue Xu; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Assessing and accounting for the impact of respiratory motion on FDG uptake and viable volume for liver lesions in free-breathing PET using respiration-suspended PET images as reference.

Authors:  Guang Li; C Ross Schmidtlein; Irene A Burger; Carole A Ridge; Stephen B Solomon; John L Humm
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The first MICCAI challenge on PET tumor segmentation.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Baptiste Laurent; Anouar Ouahabi; Hadi Fayad; Shan Tan; Laquan Li; Wei Lu; Vincent Jaouen; Clovis Tauber; Jakub Czakon; Filip Drapejkowski; Witold Dyrka; Sorina Camarasu-Pop; Frédéric Cervenansky; Pascal Girard; Tristan Glatard; Michael Kain; Yao Yao; Christian Barillot; Assen Kirov; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Optimal co-segmentation of tumor in PET-CT images with context information.

Authors:  Qi Song; Junjie Bai; Dongfeng Han; Sudershan Bhatia; Wenqing Sun; William Rockey; John E Bayouth; John M Buatti; Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  3D Alpha Matting Based Co-segmentation of Tumors on PET-CT Images.

Authors:  Zisha Zhong; Yusung Kim; John Buatti; Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Reconstr Anal Mov Body Organs Stroke Imaging Treat (2017)       Date:  2017-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.