Literature DB >> 19926044

Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Payam Dehghani1, Atif Mohammad, Ravi Bajaj, Tony Hong, Colin M Suen, Waseem Sharieff, Robert J Chisholm, Michael J B Kutryk, Neil P Fam, Asim N Cheema.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to determine the mechanism and predictors of procedural failure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the transradial approach (TR).
BACKGROUND: Transradial approach PCI reduces vascular complications compared with a transfemoral approach (TF). However, the mechanism and predictors of TR-PCI failure have not been well-characterized.
METHODS: The study population consisted of patients undergoing TR-PCI by low-to-intermediate volume operators with traditional TF guide catheters. Baseline characteristics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of TR-PCI failure.
RESULTS: A total of 2,100 patients underwent TR-PCI and represented 38% of PCI volume. Mean age was 64 +/- 12 years, and 17% were female. Vascular complications occurred in 22 (1%), and TR-PCI failure was observed in 98 (4.7%) patients. The mechanism of TR-PCI failure included inability to advance guide catheter to ascending aorta in 50 (51%), inadequate guide catheter support in 35 (36%), and unsuccessful radial artery puncture in 13 (13%) patients. The PCI was successful in 94 (96%) patients with TR-PCI failure by switching to TF. On multivariate analysis, age >75 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.33 to 6.40, p = 0.0006), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR: 7.47; 95% CI: 3.45 to 16.19, p = 0.0002), and height (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of TR-PCI failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Transradial approach PCI can be performed by low-to-intermediate volume operators with standard equipment with a low failure rate. Age >75 years, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and short stature are independent predictors of TR-PCI failure. Appropriate patient selection and careful risk assessment are needed to maximize benefits offered by TR-PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19926044     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  36 in total

1.  Delay in reperfusion with transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Might some delays be acceptable?

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; David J Cohen; Jason H Wasfy; Saif S Rathore; Laura Mauri; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Procedural and clinical utility of transulnar approach for coronary procedures following failure of radial route: Single centre experience.

Authors:  Mansour Sallam; Adil Al-Riyami; Mohammad Misbah; Rashid Al-Sukaiti; Abdallah Al-Alawi; Aiman Al-Wahaibi
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-02-06

3.  The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Eric D Peterson; Megan L Neely; David Dai; William B Hillegass; Mitchell W Krucoff; Michael A Kutcher; John C Messenger; Samir Pancholy; Robert N Piana; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Anatomical variations affect radial artery spasm and procedural achievement of transradial cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Yohei Numasawa; Akio Kawamura; Shun Kohsaka; Masashi Takahashi; Ayaka Endo; Takahide Arai; Yohei Ohno; Shinsuke Yuasa; Yuichiro Maekawa; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  How to tackle complications in radial procedures: Tip and tricks.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Chugh; Yashasvi Chugh; Sunita Chugh
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-06-16

6.  Identification and management of complications of transradial procedures.

Authors:  Adhir Shroff; Saifullah Siddiqui; Aaron Burg; Ish Singla
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Effect of Left Versus Right Radial Artery Approach for Coronary Angiography on Radiation Parameters in Patients With Predictors of Transradial Access Failure.

Authors:  Binita Shah; Joseph Burdowski; Yu Guo; Bryan Velez de Villa; Andrew Huynh; Meena Farid; Mansi Maini; Claudia Serrano-Gomez; Cezar Staniloae; Frederick Feit; Michael J Attubato; James Slater; John Coppola
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Stent Delivered to Tortuous Lesions by Using the "Five-in-Six" System.

Authors:  Wen-Jung Chung; Hsiu-Yu Fang; Chiung-Jen Wu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.672

9.  Risk factors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in Chaoshan Chinese: a locally retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Xiangna Cai; Xin Wang; Lan Chen; Duanmin Xu; Jilin Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

10.  Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches when performed by experienced operators.

Authors:  Binita Shah; Sripal Bangalore; Frederick Feit; Gregory Fernandez; John Coppola; Michael J Attubato; James Slater
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.