Literature DB >> 23430268

Anatomical variations affect radial artery spasm and procedural achievement of transradial cardiac catheterization.

Yohei Numasawa1, Akio Kawamura, Shun Kohsaka, Masashi Takahashi, Ayaka Endo, Takahide Arai, Yohei Ohno, Shinsuke Yuasa, Yuichiro Maekawa, Keiichi Fukuda.   

Abstract

Transradial cardiac catheterization (TRCC) has unique technical challenges such as access difficulty related to anatomical variations and/or radial artery (RA) spasm. We sought to evaluate the incidence of anatomical variations of the RA and whether they would affect RA spasm and procedural achievement of TRCC. A total of 744 consecutive patients who underwent TRCC were analyzed by routine radial arteriography. Anatomical variations were defined as abnormal origin of the RA and/or radioulnar loop and/or tortuous configuration. RA spasm was defined as >75 % stenosis at first radial arteriography. Overall, anatomical variations were noted in 68 patients (9.1 %), including 39 cases of abnormal origin (5.2 %), 11 cases of radioulnar loop (1.5 %), and 42 cases of tortuous configuration (5.6 %). Transradial procedures failed in 26 patients (3.5 %), and more frequently in patients with anatomical variation than in those with normal anatomy (23.5 % vs 1.5 %, P < 0.001). Importantly, on multivariate analysis the presence of anatomical variation was a distinct predictor of transradial procedure failure (odds ratio (OR) 17.80; 95 % CI 7.55-43.73; P < 0.001). RA spasm was observed in 83 patients (11.2 %), and more frequently in patients with anatomical variation than in those with normal anatomy (35.3 % vs 8.7 %, P < 0.001). Anatomical variation (OR 4.74; 95 % CI 2.61-8.47; P < 0.001) and female gender (OR 2.23; 95 % CI 1.01-4.73; P = 0.041) were distinct predictors of RA spasm. Anatomical variations were observed in 9.1 % of the patients, and strongly correlated with RA spasm and procedural achievement of TRCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23430268     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-013-0324-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  31 in total

1.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman; D Odekerken; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Arteriographic study of variant arterial anatomy of the upper extremities.

Authors:  J P Uglietta; S Kadir
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity.

Authors:  Byung-Su Yoo; Junghan Yoon; Ji-Yean Ko; Jang-Young Kim; Seung-Hwan Lee; Sung-Oh Hwang; Kyung-Hoon Choe
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention.

Authors:  N Yokoyama; S Takeshita; M Ochiai; Y Koyama; S Hoshino; T Isshiki; T Sato
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.

Authors:  Naoto Fukuda; Shin-Ichiro Iwahara; Atsushi Harada; Shinya Yokoyama; Kouichi Akutsu; Masamichi Takano; Akiyoshi Kobayashi; Shingo Kurokawa; Tohru Izumi
Journal:  Jpn Heart J       Date:  2004-09

6.  A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.

Authors:  Martin Brueck; Dirk Bandorski; Wilfried Kramer; Marcus Wieczorek; Reinhard Höltgen; Harald Tillmanns
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Feasibility and efficacy of transradial access for coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Suresh R Mulukutla; Howard A Cohen
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Safety and feasibility of transulnar cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Alexis Vasiluk Knebel; Cristiano Oliveira Cardoso; La Hore Correa Rodrigues; Rogério Eduardo Gomes Sarmento-Leite; Alexandre Schaan de Quadros; Carlos Antonio Mascia Gottschall
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

9.  Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study.

Authors:  Eduardo Aptecar; Jean-Marc Pernes; Mourad Chabane-Chaouch; Nicolas Bussy; Gino Catarino; Ali Shahmir; Karim Bougrini; Patrick Dupouy
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab.

Authors:  Francois Philippe; Fabrice Larrazet; Tarek Meziane; Alain Dibie
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  7 in total

1.  Gender differences in in-hospital clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions: an insight from a Japanese multicenter registry.

Authors:  Yohei Numasawa; Shun Kohsaka; Hiroaki Miyata; Shigetaka Noma; Masahiro Suzuki; Shiro Ishikawa; Iwao Nakamura; Yutaro Nishi; Takahiro Ohki; Koji Negishi; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Safety and feasibility of 5 French Glidesheath Slender for complex transradial interventions in small diameter radial arteries.

Authors:  Yashasvi Chugh; Sunita Chugh; Takashi Matsukage; Sanjay Kumar Chugh
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-01-25

3.  Cost reduction associated with transradial access in percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from a Japanese nationwide registry.

Authors:  Satoshi Shoji; Shun Kohsaka; Hiraku Kumamaru; Kyohei Yamaji; Shiori Nishimura; Hideki Ishii; Tetsuya Amano; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hiroaki Miyata; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-08-12

4.  Application of the dynamic needle tip positioning method for ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jae-Geum Shim; Eun A Cho; Tae-Ryun Gahng; Jiyeon Park; Eun Kyung Lee; Eun Jung Oh; Jin Hee Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Efficacy and safety of a 260-cm Amplatz Super Stiff guidewire during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Xuguang Feng; Xiaoyun Zhang; Jun Dai; Jianping Bin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Successful transradial intervention via a radial recurrent artery branch from the radioulnar alpha loop using a sheathless guiding catheter.

Authors:  Shin-Eui Yoon; Sangwook Park; Sung Gyun Ahn
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2018-06-30

7.  Angiographic evaluation of radial artery injury after transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Takenori Kanazawa; Kiyotaka Shimamura; Kazuya Nagao; Hiroshi Yukawa; Kenji Aida; Yohei Kobayashi; Naoki Takahashi; Eiichiro Nakagawa; Haruyasu Itoh; Fujio Hayashi; Toshinori Makita; Masaru Tanaka; Tsukasa Inada
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-02-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.