Literature DB >> 19923819

The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure.

R J L F Loffeld1, A B M M van der Putten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is an important diagnostic procedure for screening as well as for patients presenting with complaints. The completion of a colonoscopy is defined as cecal intubation. A large single center study was done in order to evaluate the completion rate of colonoscopy and identify reasons for failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all consecutive endoscopies of the lower digestive tract done over a period of 15 years by 2 endoscopists. The main outcome measure was a successful cecal intubation.
RESULTS: 14,139 consecutive colonoscopies were done. Overall cecal intubation was successful in 11,787 procedures (83.3%). Three hundred and sixty-one of the non-successful procedures were due to insufficient colon cleansing, and no significant abnormalities were seen in 362 procedures. In the remaining 1,629 endoscopies, significant diagnoses were made. The presence of colorectal cancer, diverticula and inflammatory bowel disease were significant findings in non-successful procedures.
CONCLUSION: In normal daily practice, colonoscopy is completed in 83.3% of the procedures. Reasons for failure are obstructing tumors, diverticula and insufficient colon cleansing. 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19923819     DOI: 10.1159/000236030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digestion        ISSN: 0012-2823            Impact factor:   3.216


  18 in total

1.  Colon capsule endoscopy: Advantages, limitations and expectations. Which novelties?

Authors:  Maria Elena Riccioni; Riccardo Urgesi; Rossella Cianci; Alessandra Bizzotto; Cristiano Spada; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-04-16

2.  The impact of advances in instrumentation and techniques of colonoscopy from 1988 to 2008 on inpatient colonoscopy performance at a high volume endoscopy unit in the United States: significantly shorter procedure time, higher completion rate, performance on sicker inpatients, and near disappearance of flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Rami Abboud
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Hood colonoscopy in trainees: a useful adjunct to improve the performance.

Authors:  Raffaele Manta; Benedetto Mangiavillano; Paolo Fedeli; Paolo Viaggi; Danilo Castellani; Rita Conigliaro; Enzo Masci; Gabrio Bassotti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The role of single-balloon colonoscopy for patients with previous incomplete standard colonoscopy: Is it worth doing it?

Authors:  Michael Christian Sulz; Remus Frei; Gian-Marco Semadeni; Mikael Sawatzki; Jan Borovicka; Christa Meyenberger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Individual polyp detection rate in routine daily endoscopy practice depends on case-mix.

Authors:  R J L F Loffeld; B Liberov; P E P Dekkers
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparison of single- versus double-balloon assisted-colonoscopy for colon examination after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ivana Dzeletovic; M Edwyn Harrison; Shabana F Pasha; Michael D Crowell; G Anton Decker; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  CT Colonography to exclude colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Sarit Badiani; Silvia Tomas Hernandez; Sharad Karandikar; Shuvro Roy-Choudhury
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher W Teshima; Sergio Zepeda-Gómez; Suliman H AlShankiti; Gurpal S Sandha
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Performing colonoscopy in elderly and very elderly patients: Risks, costs and benefits.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16

10.  Variation in caecal intubation rates between screening and symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Nalin Nagrath; Perminder S Phull
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.