BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of energy intake is difficult but critical for the evaluation of eating behavior and intervention effects. Consequently, methods to assess ad libitum energy intake under controlled conditions have been developed. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the reproducibility of ad libitum energy intake with the use of a computerized vending machine system. DESIGN: Twelve individuals (mean + or - SD: 36 + or - 8 y old; 41 + or - 8% body fat) consumed a weight-maintaining diet for 3 d; subsequently, they self-selected all food with the use of a computerized vending machine system for an additional 3 d. Mean daily energy intake was calculated from the actual weight of foods consumed and expressed as a percentage of weight-maintenance energy needs (%WMEN). Subjects repeated the study multiple times during 2 y. The within-person reproducibility of energy intake was determined through the calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between visits. RESULTS: Daily energy intake for all subjects was 5020 + or - 1753 kcal during visit 1 and 4855 + or - 1615 kcal during visit 2. There were no significant associations between energy intake and body weight, body mass index, or percentage body fat while subjects used the vending machines, which indicates that intake was not driven by body size or need. Despite overconsumption (%WMEN = 181 + or - 57%), the reproducibility of intake between visits, whether expressed as daily energy intake (ICC = 0.90), %WMEN (ICC = 0.86), weight of food consumed (ICC = 0.87), or fat intake (g/d; ICC = 0.87), was highly significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although ad libitum energy intake exceeded %WMEN, the within-person reliability of this intake across multiple visits was high, which makes this a reproducible method for the measurement of ad libitum intake in subjects who reside in a research unit. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00342732.
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of energy intake is difficult but critical for the evaluation of eating behavior and intervention effects. Consequently, methods to assess ad libitum energy intake under controlled conditions have been developed. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the reproducibility of ad libitum energy intake with the use of a computerized vending machine system. DESIGN: Twelve individuals (mean + or - SD: 36 + or - 8 y old; 41 + or - 8% body fat) consumed a weight-maintaining diet for 3 d; subsequently, they self-selected all food with the use of a computerized vending machine system for an additional 3 d. Mean daily energy intake was calculated from the actual weight of foods consumed and expressed as a percentage of weight-maintenance energy needs (%WMEN). Subjects repeated the study multiple times during 2 y. The within-person reproducibility of energy intake was determined through the calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between visits. RESULTS: Daily energy intake for all subjects was 5020 + or - 1753 kcal during visit 1 and 4855 + or - 1615 kcal during visit 2. There were no significant associations between energy intake and body weight, body mass index, or percentage body fat while subjects used the vending machines, which indicates that intake was not driven by body size or need. Despite overconsumption (%WMEN = 181 + or - 57%), the reproducibility of intake between visits, whether expressed as daily energy intake (ICC = 0.90), %WMEN (ICC = 0.86), weight of food consumed (ICC = 0.87), or fat intake (g/d; ICC = 0.87), was highly significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although ad libitum energy intake exceeded %WMEN, the within-person reliability of this intake across multiple visits was high, which makes this a reproducible method for the measurement of ad libitum intake in subjects who reside in a research unit. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00342732.
Authors: G H Beaton; J Milner; P Corey; V McGuire; M Cousins; E Stewart; M de Ramos; D Hewitt; P V Grambsch; N Kassim; J A Little Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1979-12 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Arline D Salbe; Matthias H Tschöp; Angelo DelParigi; Colleen A Venti; P Antonio Tataranni Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Douglas C Chang; Paolo Piaggi; Joushua E Burkholder; Susanne B Votruba; Jonathan Krakoff; Marci E Gluck Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2016-10-13
Authors: Alessio Basolo; Joshua Burkholder; Kristy Osgood; Alexis Graham; Sarah Bundrick; Joseph Frankl; Paolo Piaggi; Marie S Thearle; Jonathan Krakoff Journal: Metabolism Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Adela Penesova; Colleen A Venti; Joy C Bunt; Susan M Bonfiglio; Susanne B Votruba; Jonathan Krakoff Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Sascha Heinitz; Martin Reinhardt; Paolo Piaggi; Christopher M Weise; Enrique Diaz; Emma J Stinson; Colleen Venti; Susanne B Votruba; Eric M Wassermann; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; Jonathan Krakoff; Marci E Gluck Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sarah C Bundrick; Marie S Thearle; Colleen A Venti; Jonathan Krakoff; Susanne B Votruba Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-12-08 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Mathias Schlögl; Paolo Piaggi; Susanne B Votruba; Mary Walter; Jonathan Krakoff; Marie S Thearle Journal: Appetite Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: A Basolo; S Heinitz; E J Stinson; B Begaye; M Hohenadel; P Piaggi; J Krakoff; S B Votruba Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 4.256