Literature DB >> 19923311

Clinical and economic value of screening for Kras mutations as predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Erin E Mancl1, Jill M Kolesar, Lee C Vermeulen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The clinical and economic value of screening for Kras mutations as predictors of response to cetuximab and panitumumab are reviewed.
SUMMARY: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab are agents currently used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Cetuximab is approved in combination with irinotecan for second-line therapy or as a single agent in the third-line setting, and panitumumab is approved as a single agent for third-line therapy. Historically, response rates to EGFR inhibitors have been low; therefore, predictors of response or lack of response have been highly sought after. Mutations in the Kras oncogene, which encodes for the RAS protein located downstream from EGFR, have been associated with poor response to EGFR inhibitor therapy. Numerous studies have confirmed a Kras mutation frequency in approximately 40% of all metastatic colorectal cancers, as well as an associated lack of response to EGFR inhibitor therapy. Screening for Kras mutations before selecting a therapy may be clinically beneficial by avoiding the cost and toxicity of ineffective therapy. A simple breakeven analysis using a group of 100 hypothetical patients with metastatic colorectal cancer revealed that cost savings will be achieved if screening can be conducted for less than $3460 per patient, regardless of which EGFR inhibitor is used.
CONCLUSION: Mutations in the Kras oncogene are associated with a poor response to EGFR inhibitor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Implementing routine Kras screening and limiting the use of EGFR inhibitors to patients with wild-type (not mutated) Kras may have the potential for cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19923311     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp090036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  13 in total

1.  The escalating role of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in cancer management: clinical considerations for the health system pharmacist.

Authors:  Dwight D Kloth; Lew Iacovelli; Rebecca Arbuckle; Angela C McIntosh
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Tumour molecular profiling for deciding therapy-the French initiative.

Authors:  Frédérique Nowak; Jean-Charles Soria; Fabien Calvo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Panitumumab: a review of its use in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor-specific nanobody uptake and tumor burden: a tool for noninvasive monitoring of tumor response to therapy.

Authors:  Lea Olive Tchouate Gainkam; Marleen Keyaerts; Vicky Caveliers; Nick Devoogdt; Christian Vanhove; Leo Van Grunsven; Serge Muyldermans; Tony Lahoutte
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Hybridization-Induced Aggregation Technology for Practical Clinical Testing: KRAS Mutation Detection in Lung and Colorectal Tumors.

Authors:  Hillary S Sloane; James P Landers; Kimberly A Kelly
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ajay S Behl; Katrina A B Goddard; Thomas J Flottemesch; David Veenstra; Richard T Meenan; Jennifer S Lin; Michael V Maciosek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Panitumumab: the evidence for its use in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rossana Berardi; Azzurra Onofri; Mirco Pistelli; Elena Maccaroni; Mario Scartozzi; Chiara Pierantoni; Stefano Cascinu
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 8.  Are KRAS/BRAF mutations potent prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancers?

Authors:  Tomoya Yokota
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 9.  Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Importance of Tumour RAS Status.

Authors:  Marc Peeters; Meinolf Karthaus; Fernando Rivera; Jan-Henrik Terwey; Jean-Yves Douillard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Performance and cost efficiency of KRAS mutation testing for metastatic colorectal cancer in routine diagnosis: the MOKAECM study, a nationwide experience.

Authors:  Hélène Blons; Etienne Rouleau; Nathanaël Charrier; Gilles Chatellier; Jean-François Côté; Jean-Christophe Pages; Florence de Fraipont; Jean-Christophe Boyer; Jean Philippe Merlio; Alain Morel; Marie-Claude Gorisse; Patricia de Cremoux; Karen Leroy; Gérard Milano; L'houcine Ouafik; Jean-Louis Merlin; Delphine Le Corre; Pascaline Aucouturier; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Frédérique Nowak; Thierry Frebourg; Jean-François Emile; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Pierre Laurent-Puig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.