BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the utilization of single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat thoracic structures, but there have been few reports describing toxicity outcomes with this treatment. METHODS: We evaluated 119 sites (114 patients) with no prior history of thoracic radiation were treated from 10/1/2003 to 10/27/2008 with single-fraction SBRT to thoracic structures. The median dose to the gross tumor volume was 2400 cGy (range 1800-2400 cGy), as was the median dose to the planning target volume (range 1600-2400 cGy). A detailed review of thoracic toxicities was performed to include pneumonitis or Grade 2 or higher esophageal and bronchial toxicity. In addition, we retrospectively contoured the esophagus and bronchus of 48 patients treated in 2004-2005, prior to the establishment of dose constraints to determine the range of doses that these structures received. RESULTS: Of the contoured patients, the median dose to the hottest 1cc (D1cc) of the esophagus was 1250 cGy (range 158-2572 cGy). The median bronchial D1cc was 1101 cGy (range 260-2211 cGy). At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, there were seven Grade 2 or higher esophageal toxicities, including one Grade 3 and one Grade 4 toxicities. There were two bronchial toxicities, one Grade 2 and one Grade 3. There were no cases of pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose single-fraction SBRT is well tolerated to the thoracic region, with most patients tolerating high doses to central structures without significant toxicity.
BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the utilization of single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat thoracic structures, but there have been few reports describing toxicity outcomes with this treatment. METHODS: We evaluated 119 sites (114 patients) with no prior history of thoracic radiation were treated from 10/1/2003 to 10/27/2008 with single-fraction SBRT to thoracic structures. The median dose to the gross tumor volume was 2400 cGy (range 1800-2400 cGy), as was the median dose to the planning target volume (range 1600-2400 cGy). A detailed review of thoracic toxicities was performed to include pneumonitis or Grade 2 or higher esophageal and bronchial toxicity. In addition, we retrospectively contoured the esophagus and bronchus of 48 patients treated in 2004-2005, prior to the establishment of dose constraints to determine the range of doses that these structures received. RESULTS: Of the contoured patients, the median dose to the hottest 1cc (D1cc) of the esophagus was 1250 cGy (range 158-2572 cGy). The median bronchial D1cc was 1101 cGy (range 260-2211 cGy). At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, there were seven Grade 2 or higher esophageal toxicities, including one Grade 3 and one Grade 4 toxicities. There were two bronchial toxicities, one Grade 2 and one Grade 3. There were no cases of pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose single-fraction SBRT is well tolerated to the thoracic region, with most patients tolerating high doses to central structures without significant toxicity.
Authors: K Hayakawa; N Mitsuhashi; Y Saito; Y Nakayama; M Furuta; H Sakurai; M Kawashima; T Ohno; S Nasu; H Niibe Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Jean L Wright; D Michael Lovelock; Mark H Bilsky; Sean Toner; Joan Zatcky; Yoshiya Yamada Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Frank B Zimmermann; Hans Geinitz; Sabine Schill; Anca Grosu; Ulrich Schratzenstaller; Michael Molls; Branislav Jeremic Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2004-12-19 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Tarita O Thomas; Shaakir Hasan; William Small; Joseph M Herman; Michael Lock; Edward Y Kim; Nina A Mayr; Bin S Teh; Simon S Lo Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2014-06
Authors: Kylie H Kang; Christian C Okoye; Ravi B Patel; Shankar Siva; Tithi Biswas; Rodney J Ellis; Min Yao; Mitchell Machtay; Simon S Lo Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Xin Wang; Zhongxiang Zhao; Dershan Luo; James N Yang; Jinzhong Yang; Eric L Chang; Paul D Brown; Jing Li; Mary F McAleer; Amol J Ghia Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 2.102