Felicity West1, Matthew R Sanders. 1. Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. felicity@psy.uq.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Parents are often targeted for childhood obesity interventions and parent training is regarded as an integral component of family-based treatments for obesity. However, few studies have examined what challenges parents of obese children face managing their children's behaviour, and how these challenges might be addressed in treatment. To address this gap in knowledge, we describe the development and evaluation of a new measure, the Lifestyle Behaviour Checklist (LBC). METHODS: The LBC lists 26 concerns parents might have about children's eating behaviour, activity, and other weight-related behaviours; and includes a Problem scale (extent of problems) and Confidence scale (parents' confidence in dealing with these problems). This study explored the psychometric properties of the LBC in a sample of 182 parents of healthy weight, overweight, or obese 4 to 11-year-old children. A comparison is given for families with healthy weight children and families with obese children. RESULTS: The new measure successfully differentiated families with and without obese children, correctly classifying 91.1% of participants. Parents of healthy weight children reported lower levels of lifestyle behaviour problems (d=2.40) and higher levels of parenting self-efficacy (d=1.96) than parents of obese children. The LBC scales had high internal consistency and moderate test-retest stability (12 weeks). CONCLUSION: The lifestyle behaviour construct appears a useful way to conceptualise parenting challenges faced by parents of obese children, and the LBC a valid and reliable instrument. Routine administration of the LBC in childhood obesity research may assist in the development of more effective management approaches.
OBJECTIVE: Parents are often targeted for childhood obesity interventions and parent training is regarded as an integral component of family-based treatments for obesity. However, few studies have examined what challenges parents of obesechildren face managing their children's behaviour, and how these challenges might be addressed in treatment. To address this gap in knowledge, we describe the development and evaluation of a new measure, the Lifestyle Behaviour Checklist (LBC). METHODS: The LBC lists 26 concerns parents might have about children's eating behaviour, activity, and other weight-related behaviours; and includes a Problem scale (extent of problems) and Confidence scale (parents' confidence in dealing with these problems). This study explored the psychometric properties of the LBC in a sample of 182 parents of healthy weight, overweight, or obese 4 to 11-year-old children. A comparison is given for families with healthy weight children and families with obesechildren. RESULTS: The new measure successfully differentiated families with and without obesechildren, correctly classifying 91.1% of participants. Parents of healthy weight children reported lower levels of lifestyle behaviour problems (d=2.40) and higher levels of parenting self-efficacy (d=1.96) than parents of obesechildren. The LBC scales had high internal consistency and moderate test-retest stability (12 weeks). CONCLUSION: The lifestyle behaviour construct appears a useful way to conceptualise parenting challenges faced by parents of obesechildren, and the LBC a valid and reliable instrument. Routine administration of the LBC in childhood obesity research may assist in the development of more effective management approaches.
Authors: Kelly A Wagner; Ethan Braun; Seth M Armah; Diarmuid Horan; Lisa G Smith; Julie Pike; Wanzhu Tu; Marc T Hamilton; Edward J Delp; Wayne W Campbell; Carol J Boushey; Tamara S Hannon; Nana Gletsu-Miller Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: N D Wright; A E Groisman-Perelstein; J Wylie-Rosett; N Vernon; P M Diamantis; C R Isasi Journal: J Hum Nutr Diet Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 3.089
Authors: Rachael W Taylor; Deirdre Brown; Anna M Dawson; Jill Haszard; Adell Cox; Elaine A Rose; Barry J Taylor; Kim Meredith-Jones; Lee Treacy; Jim Ross; Sheila M William Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Geoff D C Ball; Kathryn A Ambler; Rachel A Keaschuk; Rhonda J Rosychuk; Nicholas L Holt; John C Spence; Mary M Jetha; Arya M Sharma; Amanda S Newton Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Sanne M P L Gerards; Karin Hummel; Pieter C Dagnelie; Nanne K de Vries; Stef P J Kremers Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Anna Ek; Kathryn Lewis Chamberlain; Jan Ejderhamn; Philip A Fisher; Claude Marcus; Patricia Chamberlain; Paulina Nowicka Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 3.295