Literature DB >> 19921812

A calibration method for nanowire biosensors to suppress device-to-device variation.

Fumiaki N Ishikawa1, Marco Curreli, Hsiao-Kang Chang, Po-Chiang Chen, Rui Zhang, Richard J Cote, Mark E Thompson, Chongwu Zhou.   

Abstract

Nanowire/nanotube biosensors have stimulated significant interest; however, the inevitable device-to-device variation in the biosensor performance remains a great challenge. We have developed an analytical method to calibrate nanowire biosensor responses that can suppress the device-to-device variation in sensing response significantly. The method is based on our discovery of a strong correlation between the biosensor gate dependence (dI(ds)/dV(g)) and the absolute response (absolute change in current, DeltaI). In(2)O(3) nanowire-based biosensors for streptavidin detection were used as the model system. Studying the liquid gate effect and ionic concentration dependence of strepavidin sensing indicates that electrostatic interaction is the dominant mechanism for sensing response. Based on this sensing mechanism and transistor physics, a linear correlation between the absolute sensor response (DeltaI) and the gate dependence (dI(ds)/dV(g)) is predicted and confirmed experimentally. Using this correlation, a calibration method was developed where the absolute response is divided by dI(ds)/dV(g) for each device, and the calibrated responses from different devices behaved almost identically. Compared to the common normalization method (normalization of the conductance/resistance/current by the initial value), this calibration method was proven advantageous using a conventional transistor model. The method presented here substantially suppresses device-to-device variation, allowing the use of nanosensors in large arrays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19921812      PMCID: PMC2805439          DOI: 10.1021/nn9011384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  40 in total

1.  Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species.

Authors:  Y Cui; Q Wei; H Park; C M Lieber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highly specific electronic biosensors.

Authors:  Robert J Chen; Sarunya Bangsaruntip; Katerina A Drouvalakis; Nadine Wong Shi Kam; Moonsub Shim; Yiming Li; Woong Kim; Paul J Utz; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Synthesis, electronic properties, and applications of indium oxide nanowires.

Authors:  C Li; D Zhang; S Han; X Liu; T Tang; B Lei; Z Liu; C Zhou
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Quantitative real-time measurements of DNA hybridization with alkylated nonoxidized silicon nanowires in electrolyte solution.

Authors:  Yuri L Bunimovich; Young Shik Shin; Woon-Seok Yeo; Michael Amori; Gabriel Kwong; James R Heath
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Detection, stimulation, and inhibition of neuronal signals with high-density nanowire transistor arrays.

Authors:  Fernando Patolsky; Brian P Timko; Guihua Yu; Ying Fang; Andrew B Greytak; Gengfeng Zheng; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Langmuir-blodgett assembly of densely aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes from bulk materials.

Authors:  Xiaolin Li; Li Zhang; Xinran Wang; Iwao Shimoyama; Xiaoming Sun; Won-Seok Seo; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Large-scale, heterogeneous integration of nanowire arrays for image sensor circuitry.

Authors:  Zhiyong Fan; Johnny C Ho; Zachery A Jacobson; Haleh Razavi; Ali Javey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Calibration method for a carbon nanotube field-effect transistor biosensor.

Authors:  Masuhiro Abe; Katsuyuki Murata; Tatsuaki Ataka; Kazuhiko Matsumoto
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 3.874

9.  Carbon nanotube DNA sensor and sensing mechanism.

Authors:  Xiaowu Tang; Sarunya Bansaruntip; Nozomi Nakayama; Erhan Yenilmez; Ying-Lan Chang; Qian Wang
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Large-scale assembly of silicon nanowire network-based devices using conventional microfabrication facilities.

Authors:  Kwang Heo; Eunhee Cho; Jee-Eun Yang; Myoung-Ha Kim; Minbaek Lee; Byung Yang Lee; Soon Gu Kwon; Moon-sook Lee; Moon-Ho Jo; Heon-Jin Choi; Taeghwan Hyeon; Seunghun Hong
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Molecular analysis of blood with micro-/nanoscale field-effect-transistor biosensors.

Authors:  Matthew S Makowski; Albena Ivanisevic
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 2.  Nano-Bioelectronics.

Authors:  Anqi Zhang; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Large-Area, Ultrathin Metal-Oxide Semiconductor Nanoribbon Arrays Fabricated by Chemical Lift-Off Lithography.

Authors:  Chuanzhen Zhao; Xiaobin Xu; Sang-Hoon Bae; Qing Yang; Wenfei Liu; Jason N Belling; Kevin M Cheung; You Seung Rim; Yang Yang; Anne M Andrews; Paul S Weiss
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Detecting DNA and RNA and Differentiating Single-Nucleotide Variations via Field-Effect Transistors.

Authors:  Kevin M Cheung; John M Abendroth; Nako Nakatsuka; Bowen Zhu; Yang Yang; Anne M Andrews; Paul S Weiss
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Selective, electrochemically activated biofunctionalization of In2O3 nanowires using an air-stable surface modifier.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Marco Curreli; Mark E Thompson
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Phenylalanine Monitoring via Aptamer-Field-Effect Transistor Sensors.

Authors:  Kevin M Cheung; Kyung-Ae Yang; Nako Nakatsuka; Chuanzhen Zhao; Mao Ye; Michael E Jung; Hongyan Yang; Paul S Weiss; Milan N Stojanović; Anne M Andrews
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 7.711

Review 7.  Biomedical detection via macro- and nano-sensors fabricated with metallic and semiconducting oxides.

Authors:  Jong-In Hahm
Journal:  J Biomed Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  Multiplexed SOI BioFETs.

Authors:  Aleksandar Vacic; Jason M Criscione; Eric Stern; Nitin K Rajan; Tarek Fahmy; Mark A Reed
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Quantification of the affinities and kinetics of protein interactions using silicon nanowire biosensors.

Authors:  Xuexin Duan; Yue Li; Nitin K Rajan; David A Routenberg; Yorgo Modis; Mark A Reed
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Regenerative electronic biosensors using supramolecular approaches.

Authors:  Xuexin Duan; Nitin K Rajan; David A Routenberg; Jurriaan Huskens; Mark A Reed
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.