Literature DB >> 19921582

Diagnosing prosopagnosia: effects of ageing, sex, and participant-stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test.

Devin C Bowles1, Elinor McKone, Amy Dawel, Bradley Duchaine, Romina Palermo, Laura Schmalzl, Davide Rivolta, C Ellie Wilson, Galit Yovel.   

Abstract

The Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) and Cambridge Face Perception Test (CFPT) have provided the first theoretically strong clinical tests for prosopagnosia based on novel rather than famous faces. Here, we assess the extent to which norms for these tasks must take into account ageing, sex, and testing country. Data were from Australians aged 18 to 88 years (N = 240 for CFMT; 128 for CFPT) and young adult Israelis (N = 49 for CFMT). Participants were unselected for face recognition ability; most were university educated. The diagnosis cut-off for prosopagnosia (2 SDs poorer than mean) was affected by age, participant-stimulus ethnic match (within Caucasians), and sex for middle-aged and older adults on the CFPT. We also report internal reliability, correlation between face memory and face perception, correlations with intelligence-related measures, correlation with self-report, distribution shape for the CFMT, and prevalence of developmental prosopagnosia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19921582     DOI: 10.1080/02643290903343149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  86 in total

1.  About-face on face recognition ability and holistic processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Neural microgenesis of personally familiar face recognition.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Luca Vizioli; Joan Liu-Shuang; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Measuring nonvisual knowledge about object categories: The Semantic Vanderbilt Expertise Test.

Authors:  Ana E Van Gulick; Rankin W McGugin; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

4.  Italian normative data and validation of two neuropsychological tests of face recognition: Benton Facial Recognition Test and Cambridge Face Memory Test.

Authors:  Andrea Albonico; Manuela Malaspina; Roberta Daini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Item response theory analyses of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT).

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Jeremy Wilmer; Grit Herzmann; Rankin Williams McGugin; Daniel Fiset; Ana E Van Gulick; Kaitlin F Ryan; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-02-02

6.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer; Laura Germine; Christopher F Chabris; Garga Chatterjee; Mark Williams; Eric Loken; Ken Nakayama; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A strong role for nature in face recognition.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Romina Palermo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Self-reported face recognition is highly valid, but alone is not highly discriminative of prosopagnosia-level performance on objective assessments.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Elyana Saad; Ayooluwa O Douglas; Laura Germine; Jeremy B Wilmer; Joseph M DeGutis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

9.  Facial identity recognition in the broader autism phenotype.

Authors:  C Ellie Wilson; Phillipa Freeman; Jon Brock; A Mike Burton; Romina Palermo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Face Processing Systems: From Neurons to Real-World Social Perception.

Authors:  Winrich Freiwald; Bradley Duchaine; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.