PURPOSE: We evaluated whether 18F-FDG-PET altered stage classification, management, and prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PROCEDURES: We identified 46 consecutive patients undergoing staging positron emission tomography for SCLC from 1993-2008 inclusive. Updated survival data from the state Cancer Registry was available on 42 of 46 patients. RESULTS: PET altered stage classification in 12 of 46 (26%) patients. PET altered treatment modality in nine patients, and the target mediastinal radiation field in another three patients. Therefore, PET altered management in 12 of 46 (26%) patients. Patients with limited disease (LD) on pre-PET staging had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than those upstaged to extensive disease (ED; median 18.6 months versus 5.7 months; log-rank p < 0.0001). In patients with ED on pre-PET staging, those downstaged to LD by PET had significantly longer OS than those with ED on PET (median 10.9 months versus 5.9 months; log-rank p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: PET had a major impact on stage classification, management, and prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed SCLC.
PURPOSE: We evaluated whether 18F-FDG-PET altered stage classification, management, and prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PROCEDURES: We identified 46 consecutive patients undergoing staging positron emission tomography for SCLC from 1993-2008 inclusive. Updated survival data from the state Cancer Registry was available on 42 of 46 patients. RESULTS: PET altered stage classification in 12 of 46 (26%) patients. PET altered treatment modality in nine patients, and the target mediastinal radiation field in another three patients. Therefore, PET altered management in 12 of 46 (26%) patients. Patients with limited disease (LD) on pre-PET staging had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than those upstaged to extensive disease (ED; median 18.6 months versus 5.7 months; log-rank p < 0.0001). In patients with ED on pre-PET staging, those downstaged to LD by PET had significantly longer OS than those with ED on PET (median 10.9 months versus 5.9 months; log-rank p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: PET had a major impact on stage classification, management, and prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed SCLC.
Authors: J P Pignon; R Arriagada; D C Ihde; D H Johnson; M C Perry; R L Souhami; O Brodin; R A Joss; M S Kies; B Lebeau Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-12-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ramaswamy Govindan; Nathan Page; Daniel Morgensztern; William Read; Ryan Tierney; Anna Vlahiotis; Edward L Spitznagel; Jay Piccirillo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: I Brink; T Schumacher; M Mix; S Ruhland; E Stoelben; W Digel; M Henke; N Ghanem; E Moser; E U Nitzsche Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-07-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Mridula Vinjamuri; Michael Craig; Annette Campbell-Fontaine; Mohammed Almubarak; Naresh Gupta; John S Rogers Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Andrew M Scott; Dishan H Gunawardana; Ben Kelley; John G Stuckey; Amanda J Byrne; Jayne E Ramshaw; Michael J Fulham Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-08-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: N Murray; P Coy; J L Pater; I Hodson; A Arnold; B C Zee; D Payne; E C Kostashuk; W K Evans; P Dixon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gregory P Kalemkerian; Wallace Akerley; Paul Bogner; Hossein Borghaei; Laura Qm Chow; Robert J Downey; Leena Gandhi; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Ramaswamy Govindan; John C Grecula; James Hayman; Rebecca Suk Heist; Leora Horn; Thierry Jahan; Marianna Koczywas; Billy W Loo; Robert E Merritt; Cesar A Moran; Harvey B Niell; Janis O'Malley; Jyoti D Patel; Neal Ready; Charles M Rudin; Charles C Williams; Kristina Gregory; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2013-01-01 Impact factor: 11.908