Jing Jiang1, Wei Chen, Rujin Zhuang, Tiefang Song, Peiling Li. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No 246, Xue Fu Road, Nan Gang District, 150001 Harbin, Hei Longjiang, China.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Endostatin is the most potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. However, endostatin protein has a short half-time and virus-mediated endostatin gene therapy has serious toxicity, which limits the application of endostatin in clinical therapy. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered to be able to accumulate at the site of cancers with high specificity and may be used as a new delivery of endostatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MSCs from the human bone marrow were transfected with recombinant adenovirus encoding endostatin and EGFP (MSC-EN cells). The tropism capacity of MSCs was quantitatively assayed in vitro using the Millicell system. To investigate the impact of secreted endostatin on cancer cells, SKOV3 cells were co-cultured with MSC-EN cells in Millicell for 48 h, then apoptosis and cell cycle were analyzed on a flow cytometer. RESULTS: In contrast with 293 cells and saline, SKOV3 cells significantly stimulated migration of MSCs, the number reached 919.67 +/- 19.96 (P < 0.05). The endostatin produced by MSC-EN cells made 13.08 +/- 0.21% SKOV3 cells undergo early stage apoptosis (control 3.23 +/- 0.73%, P < 0.05) and 82.05 +/- 2.65% SKOV3 cells accumulate in the G0/G1 phase (control 66.51 +/- 2.91%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We found that MSCs possessed great migratory capacity in vitro and the human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line SKOV3 could significantly induce the migration of MSCs. Our results provided evidence that MSCs could be utilized as a powerful delivery system of endostatin. The endostatin produced by MSC-EN cells could inhibit the proliferation of SKOV3 cells.
INTRODUCTION:Endostatin is the most potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. However, endostatin protein has a short half-time and virus-mediated endostatin gene therapy has serious toxicity, which limits the application of endostatin in clinical therapy. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered to be able to accumulate at the site of cancers with high specificity and may be used as a new delivery of endostatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MSCs from the human bone marrow were transfected with recombinant adenovirus encoding endostatin and EGFP (MSC-EN cells). The tropism capacity of MSCs was quantitatively assayed in vitro using the Millicell system. To investigate the impact of secreted endostatin on cancer cells, SKOV3 cells were co-cultured with MSC-EN cells in Millicell for 48 h, then apoptosis and cell cycle were analyzed on a flow cytometer. RESULTS: In contrast with 293 cells and saline, SKOV3 cells significantly stimulated migration of MSCs, the number reached 919.67 +/- 19.96 (P < 0.05). The endostatin produced by MSC-EN cells made 13.08 +/- 0.21% SKOV3 cells undergo early stage apoptosis (control 3.23 +/- 0.73%, P < 0.05) and 82.05 +/- 2.65% SKOV3 cells accumulate in the G0/G1 phase (control 66.51 +/- 2.91%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We found that MSCs possessed great migratory capacity in vitro and the humanovarian adenocarcinoma cell line SKOV3 could significantly induce the migration of MSCs. Our results provided evidence that MSCs could be utilized as a powerful delivery system of endostatin. The endostatin produced by MSC-EN cells could inhibit the proliferation of SKOV3 cells.
Authors: Brett Hall; Jennifer Dembinski; A Kate Sasser; Matus Studeny; Michael Andreeff; Frank Marini Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: Sebastian Hoffmann; Annette Wunderlich; Susanne Lingelbach; Petra B Musholt; Thomas J Musholt; Reinhard von Wasielewski; Andreas Zielke Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Kenneth R Hess; Hai T Tran; Jennifer E Tseng; Nizar A Mullani; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Timothy Madden; Darren W Davis; David J McConkey; Michael S O'Reilly; Lee M Ellis; James Pluda; Waun K Hong; James L Abbruzzese Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel J Ceradini; Anita R Kulkarni; Matthew J Callaghan; Oren M Tepper; Nicholas Bastidas; Mark E Kleinman; Jennifer M Capla; Robert D Galiano; Jamie P Levine; Geoffrey C Gurtner Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-07-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: José Augusto Rinck-Junior; Cristiane Oliveira; Gustavo Jacob Lourenço; Regina Aparecida Martinho Sagarra; Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain; José Getulio Segalla; Carmen Silvia Passos Lima Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Mrudula Pullambhatla; Steven P Rowe; Ala Lisok; Yuchuan Wang; Gabriele Putz Todd; Alla Danilkovitch; Martin G Pomper Journal: Tomography Date: 2020-12-01