Literature DB >> 1992073

Large compressive preloads decrease lumbar motion segment flexibility.

J Janevic1, J A Ashton-Miller, A B Schultz.   

Abstract

The bending, shear, and torsion flexibilities of 13 intact adult lumbar motion segments (from 11 men, two women, 48-83 years of age) were compared under three different compressive preloads, 0, 2,200, and 4,400 N. Test forces and moments up to 160 N and 16 Nm were applied at the center of the upper end plate of the intact disc. A compressive preload of 2,200 N resulted in a significant decrease in motion segment flexibilities in all seven test directions (p less than 0.06) when compared with results obtained with no preload; the preload decreased flexibility 2.6, 4.5, and 6.1 times in bending, axial torsion, and shear, respectively. These results suggest that studies of internal trunk load-sharing between active and passive tissues during strenuous tasks, which engender large spine compressive loads, should take these changes in spine passive resistance into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1992073     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100090211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  13 in total

1.  Biomechanical Comparison of Robotically Applied Pure Moment, Ideal Follower Load, and Novel Trunk Weight Loading Protocols on L4-L5 Cadaveric Segments during Flexion-Extension.

Authors:  Charles R Bennett; Denis J DiAngelo; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model-Method and Performance in Flexed Postures.

Authors:  Xiangjie Meng; Alexander G Bruno; Bo Cheng; Wenjun Wang; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  New methodology for multi-dimensional spinal joint testing with a parallel robot.

Authors:  Matthew R Walker; James P Dickey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Dynamics of an intervertebral disc prosthesis in human cadaveric spines.

Authors:  Kathleen N Meyers; Deirdre A Campbell; Joseph D Lipman; Kai Zhang; Elizabeth R Myers; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

Review 5.  Moment-rotation behavior of intervertebral joints in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at all levels of the human spine: A structured review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Chaofei Zhang; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Benjamin M Wong; Wenjun Wang; Bo Cheng; Elizabeth A Friis; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Three-dimensional biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine in vitro. I. Analysis of normal motion.

Authors:  N Wen; F Lavaste; J J Santin; J P Lassau
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Quantitative MRI as a diagnostic tool of intervertebral disc matrix composition and integrity.

Authors:  Fackson Mwale; James C Iatridis; John Antoniou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement.

Authors:  Burkhard Rischke; Raymond S Ross; Boris A Jollenbeck; Kari B Zimmers; Neal D Defibaugh
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-12-01

9.  Lower trunk kinematics and muscle activity during different types of tennis serves.

Authors:  John W Chow; Soo-An Park; Mark D Tillman
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2009-10-13

10.  Do Trunk Muscles Affect the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate?: Correlation of Trunk Muscle Cross Sectional Area and Fusion Rates after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Cage.

Authors:  Man Kyu Choi; Sung Bum Kim; Bong Jin Park; Chang Kyu Park; Sung Min Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.