Literature DB >> 32860122

Feature tracking and mapping analysis of myocardial response to improved perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina treated by coronary sinus Reducer implantation: a CMR study.

Anna Palmisano1,2, Francesco Giannini3,4, Paola Rancoita5, Guglielmo Gallone3,6, Giulia Benedetti1,7, Luca Baldetti3, Georgios Tzanis3, Davide Vignale1,2, Caterina Monti8, Francesco Ponticelli4, Marco Ancona3, Matteo Montorfano3, Alessandro Del Maschio1, Francesco De Cobelli1,2, Antonio Colombo4, Antonio Esposito9,10.   

Abstract

Coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation improves myocardial perfusion and symptoms in patients with debilitating refractory angina. Its impact on myocardial remodeling remain uncertain. Aim of the present study was to assess possible impact of CS Reducer on myocardial systolic-diastolic deformation and microstructural remodeling, as assessed through cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking and mapping analysis. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with refractory angina underwent multiparametric stress CMR before and 4 months after CS Reducer implantation. Eight patients were excluded (6 for absence of inducible ischemia, 2 for artifacts). Modifications in 3D systo-diastolic myocardial deformation were evaluated using feature tracking analysis on rest cine images. Myocardial microstructural remodeling was assessed by native T1 mapping, cellular and matrix volume and extracellular volume fraction (ECV). Collaterally, the percentage of ischemic myocardium (ischemic burden %) and the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) were measured. After CS Reducer implantation, myocardial contractility improved (ejection fraction rose from 61 to 67%; p = 0.0079), along with longitudinal (from - 16 to - 19%; p = 0.0192) and circumferential strain (from - 18 to - 21%; p = 0.0017). Peak diastolic radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain rate did not change (p > 0.05), and no changes in native T1, ECV, cellular and matrix volume were observed. Myocardial perfusion improved, with a reduction of ischemic burden (13-11%; p = 0.0135), and recovery of intramural perfusion balance in segments with baseline ischemia (MPRi endocardial/epicardial ratio from 0.67 to 0.96; p = 0.0107). CS Reducer improves myocardial longitudinal and circumferential strain, without microstructural remodeling and no impact on diastolic proprieties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance; ECV; Reducer; Refractory angina; Stress imaging; T1 mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32860122     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01964-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

1.  Transcatheter treatment for refractory angina with the Coronary Sinus Reducer.

Authors:  Maayan Konigstein; Nathalie Meyten; Stefan Verheye; Marc Schwartz; Shmuel Banai
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.534

2.  Patterns of Regional Myocardial Perfusion Following Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation: Insights by Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Francesco Giannini; Anna Palmisano; Luca Baldetti; Giulia Benedetti; Francesco Ponticelli; Paola M V Rancoita; Neil Ruparelia; Guglielmo Gallone; Marco Ancona; Antonio Mangieri; Georgios Tzanis; Francesco De Cobelli; Alessandro Del Maschio; Antonio Colombo; Antonio Esposito
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Incomplete coronary sinus reducer endothelialization as potential mechanism of clinical failure.

Authors:  Francesco Giannini; Georgios Tzanis; Shmuel Banai; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Coronary Sinus Stent: Could It Help in Refractory Chronic Stable Angina?

Authors:  Wael ElMallah
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Frailty in patients undergoing TAVI: how can we measure it?

Authors:  Anna Sonia Petronio; Cristina Giannini
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 6.534

6.  Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation improves symptoms, ischaemia and physical capacity in patients with refractory angina unsuitable for myocardial revascularisation: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Maayan Konigstein; Samuel Bazan; Miri Revivo; Shmuel Banai
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 6.534

7.  Coronary sinus occlusion enhances coronary collateral flow and reduces subendocardial ischemia.

Authors:  A Ido; N Hasebe; H Matsuhashi; K Kikuchi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus in refractory angina.

Authors:  Stefan Verheye; E Marc Jolicœur; Miles W Behan; Thomas Pettersson; Paul Sainsbury; Jonathan Hill; Mathias Vrolix; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Thomas Engstrom; Marino Labinaz; Ranil de Silva; Marc Schwartz; Nathalie Meyten; Neal G Uren; Serge Doucet; Jean-François Tanguay; Steven Lindsay; Timothy D Henry; Christopher J White; Elazer R Edelman; Shmuel Banai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Coronary sinus reducer stent for the treatment of chronic refractory angina pectoris: a prospective, open-label, multicenter, safety feasibility first-in-man study.

Authors:  Shmuel Banai; Shmuel Ben Muvhar; Keyur H Parikh; Aharon Medina; Horst Sievert; Ashok Seth; Jonathan Tsehori; Yoav Paz; Ami Sheinfeld; Gad Keren
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Jackie Szymonifka; Jos W R Twisk; Bjarne L Norgaard; Christopher K Zarins; Paul Knaapen; James K Min
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 35.855

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Stress CMR in Known or Suspected CAD: Diagnostic and Prognostic Role.

Authors:  Francesca Baessato; Marco Guglielmo; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Baggiano; Laura Fusini; Stefano Scafuri; Mario Babbaro; Rocco Mollace; Ada Collevecchio; Andrea I Guaricci; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Coronary sinus reducer transfemoral extraction after intraprocedural device migration: A case report.

Authors:  Matjaz Bunc; Miha Sustersic; Crt Langel; Dimitrij Kuhelj; Shmuel Banai
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 3.  Advanced cardiac imaging in athlete's heart: unravelling the grey zone between physiologic adaptation and pathology.

Authors:  Anna Palmisano; Fatemeh Darvizeh; Giulia Cundari; Giuseppe Rovere; Giovanni Ferrandino; Valeria Nicoletti; Francesco Cilia; Silvia De Vizio; Roberto Palumbo; Antonio Esposito; Marco Francone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 3.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.