Literature DB >> 19919583

Pandemic influenza: human rights, ethics and duty to treat.

I Pahlman1, H Tohmo, H Gylling.   

Abstract

The 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic seems to be only moderately severe. In the future, a pandemic influenza with high lethality, such as the Spanish influenza in 1918-1919 or even worse, may emerge. In this kind of scenario, lethality rates ranging roughly from 2% to 30% have been proposed. Legal and ethical issues should be discussed before the incident. This article aims to highlight the legal, ethical and professional aspects that might be relevant to anaesthesiologists in the case of a high-lethality infectious disease such as a severe pandemic influenza. The epidemiology, the role of anaesthesiologists and possible threats to the profession and colleagueship within medical specialties relevant to anaesthesiologists are reviewed. During historical plague epidemics, some doctors have behaved like 'deserters'. However, during the Spanish influenza, physicians remained at their jobs, although many perished. In surveys, more than half of the health-care workers have reported their willingness to work in the case of severe pandemics. Physicians have the same human rights as all citizens: they have to be effectively protected against infectious disease. However, they have a duty to treat. Fair and responsible colleagueship among the diverse medical specialties should be promoted. Until disaster threatens humanity, volunteering to work during a pandemic might be the best way to ensure that physicians and other health-care workers stay at their workplace. Broad discussion in society is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19919583     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  6 in total

1.  Reorganising the pandemic triage processes to ethically maximise individuals' best interests.

Authors:  Andrew Tillyard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Legal preparedness: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.

Authors:  Brooke Courtney; James G Hodge; Eric S Toner; Beth E Roxland; Matthew S Penn; Asha V Devereaux; Jeffrey R Dichter; Niranjan Kissoon; Michael D Christian; Tia Powell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Balancing the Duty to Treat Patients with Ebola Virus Disease with the Risks to Dialysis Personnel.

Authors:  Nicholas G Evans
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Concerns, perceived impact, and preparedness of oral healthcare workers in their working environment during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Farooq Ahmad Chaudhary; Basaruddin Ahmad; Paras Ahmad; Muhammad Danial Khalid; Danial Qasim Butt; Soban Qadir Khan
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  The principle of salvage in the context of COVID-19.

Authors:  Alan J Kearns
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Civil Disobedience in Times of Pandemic: Clarifying Rights and Duties.

Authors:  Yoann Della Croce; Ophelia Nicole-Berva
Journal:  Crim Law Philos       Date:  2021-07-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.