| Literature DB >> 19918635 |
Marcus Barreto Conde, Fernando Augusto Fiuza de Melo, Ana Maria Campos Marques, Ninarosa Calzavara Cardoso, Valeria Goes Ferreira Pinheiro, Paulo de Tarso Roth Dalcin, Almério Machado Junior, Antonio Carlos Moreira Lemos, Antônio Ruffino Netto, Betina Durovni, Clemax Couto Sant'Anna, Dinalva Lima, Domenico Capone, Draurio Barreira, Eliana Dias Matos, Fernanda Carvalho de Queiroz Mello, Fernando Cezar David, Giovanni Marsico, Jorge Barros Afiune, José Roberto Lapa e Silva, Leda Fátima Jamal, Maria Alice da Silva Telles, Mário Hiroyuki Hirata, Margareth Pretti Dalcolmo, Marcelo Fouad Rabahi, Michelle Cailleaux-Cesar, Moises Palaci, Nelson Morrone, Renata Leborato Guerra, Reynaldo Dietze, Silvana Spíndola de Miranda, Solange Cesar Cavalcante, Susie Andries Nogueira, Tatiana Senna Galvão Nonato, Terezinha Martire, Vera Maria Nader Galesi, Valdério do Valle Dettoni.
Abstract
New scientific articles about tuberculosis (TB) are published daily worldwide. However, it is difficult for health care workers, overloaded with work, to stay abreast of the latest research findings and to discern which information can and should be used in their daily practice on assisting TB patients. The purpose of the III Brazilian Thoracic Association (BTA) Guidelines on TB is to critically review the most recent national and international scientific information on TB, presenting an updated text with the most current and useful tools against TB to health care workers in our country. The III BTA Guidelines on TB have been developed by the BTA Committee on TB and the TB Work Group, based on the text of the II BTA Guidelines on TB (2004). We reviewed the following databases: LILACS (SciELO) and PubMed (Medline). The level of evidence of the cited articles was determined, and 24 recommendations on TB have been evaluated, discussed by all of the members of the BTA Committee on TB and of the TB Work Group, and highlighted. The first version of the present Guidelines was posted on the BTA website and was available for public consultation for three weeks. Comments and critiques were evaluated. The level of scientific evidence of each reference was evaluated before its acceptance for use in the final text.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19918635 DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132009001000011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bras Pneumol ISSN: 1806-3713 Impact factor: 2.624