Georgina C Morris1, Charles J N Lacey. 1. Centre for Immunology and Infection, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK. georgina.morris@hyms.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an update on developments in HIV microbicide research in the light of recent phase 3 efficacy studies and discusses how lessons learnt from early generation microbicide candidates can assist the development of future agents. RECENT FINDINGS: Results of an interim analysis of a phase 3 trial suggested that cellulose sulfate increased the risk of HIV acquisition compared with placebo. Carraguard, SAVVY and Buffergel also failed to show any HIV protection in human efficacy trials. Recent research has focused on elucidating the reasons behind these failures as well as improving the assessment of safety and efficacy for the next generation of microbicide candidates. PRO 2000 0.5% gel is the only HIV microbicide candidate for which there are preliminary data suggesting efficacy in women. Antiretroviral agents and entry inhibitors may provide the key in the future to developing an effective HIV microbicide both for vaginal and rectal use. SUMMARY: Development of a protective 'barrier' which can be controlled by the receptive partner independent of time of coitus remains a key goal in HIV prevention. A gel or ring-delivered combination of active anti-HIV agents may prove more efficacious than a single agent alone. Challenges in evaluating and manufacturing new candidates must be overcome before a well tolerated, effective, acceptable and affordable microbicide can be produced.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an update on developments in HIV microbicide research in the light of recent phase 3 efficacy studies and discusses how lessons learnt from early generation microbicide candidates can assist the development of future agents. RECENT FINDINGS: Results of an interim analysis of a phase 3 trial suggested that cellulose sulfate increased the risk of HIV acquisition compared with placebo. Carraguard, SAVVY and Buffergel also failed to show any HIV protection in human efficacy trials. Recent research has focused on elucidating the reasons behind these failures as well as improving the assessment of safety and efficacy for the next generation of microbicide candidates. PRO 2000 0.5% gel is the only HIV microbicide candidate for which there are preliminary data suggesting efficacy in women. Antiretroviral agents and entry inhibitors may provide the key in the future to developing an effective HIV microbicide both for vaginal and rectal use. SUMMARY: Development of a protective 'barrier' which can be controlled by the receptive partner independent of time of coitus remains a key goal in HIV prevention. A gel or ring-delivered combination of active anti-HIV agents may prove more efficacious than a single agent alone. Challenges in evaluating and manufacturing new candidates must be overcome before a well tolerated, effective, acceptable and affordable microbicide can be produced.
Authors: José das Neves; Johan Michiels; Kevin K Ariën; Guido Vanham; Mansoor Amiji; Maria Fernanda Bahia; Bruno Sarmento Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Michael D Bobardt; Udayan Chatterji; Lana Schaffer; Lot de Witte; Philippe A Gallay Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Claire J Forbes; Clare F McCoy; Diarmaid J Murphy; A David Woolfson; John P Moore; Abbey Evans; Robin J Shattock; R Karl Malcolm Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Nobuyuki Matoba; Adam S Husk; Brian W Barnett; Michelle M Pickel; Charles J Arntzen; David C Montefiori; Atsushi Takahashi; Kazunobu Tanno; Satoshi Omura; Huyen Cao; Jason P Mooney; Carl V Hanson; Haruo Tanaka Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kyeong-Ae Kim; Maral Yolamanova; Onofrio Zirafi; Nadia R Roan; Ludger Staendker; Wolf-Georg Forssmann; Adam Burgener; Nathalie Dejucq-Rainsford; Beatrice H Hahn; George M Shaw; Warner C Greene; Frank Kirchhoff; Jan Münch Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 4.602
Authors: Sten H Vermund; José A Tique; Holly M Cassell; Megan E Pask; Philip J Ciampa; Carolyn M Audet Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731