Literature DB >> 19917757

In vitro and in vivo efficacies of teicoplanin-loaded calcium sulfate for treatment of chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.

Wei-Tao Jia1, Shi-Hua Luo, Chang-Qing Zhang, Jian-Qiang Wang.   

Abstract

The in vitro and in vivo therapeutic efficacies of teicoplanin-loaded calcium sulfate (TCS; 10% [wt] teicoplanin) were investigated in a rabbit model of chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) osteomyelitis. The in vitro elution characteristics of teicoplanin from TCS pellets were realized by carrying out an evaluation of the release kinetics, recovery rate, and antibacterial activity of the released teicoplanin. Chronic osteomyelitis was induced by inoculating 10(7) CFU of a MRSA strain into the tibial cavity of rabbits. After 3 weeks, the animals were treated by debridement followed by implantation of TCS pellets in group 1, calcium sulfate (CS) pellets alone in group 2, and intravenous (i.v.) teicoplanin (6 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h for three doses and then every 24 h up to 4 weeks) in group 3. Animals in group 4 were left untreated. After 6 weeks, the efficacy of the osteomyelitis treatment was evaluated by hematological, radiological, microbiological, and histological examinations. In vitro elution studies showed sustained release of teicoplanin at a therapeutic level over a time period of 3 weeks. The released teicoplanin maintained its antibacterial activity. In vivo, the best therapeutic effect was observed in animals treated with TCS pellets, resulting in significantly lower radiological and histological scores, lower positive rates of MRSA culture and bacterial load, and excellent bone regeneration compared with those treated by CS alone or i.v. teicoplanin, without any local or systemic adverse effects. TCS pellets are an effective alternative to i.v. teicoplanin for the treatment of chronic MRSA osteomyelitis, particularly because teicoplanin is delivered locally while the TCS pellets simultaneously promote bone defect repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19917757      PMCID: PMC2798490          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01122-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  29 in total

Review 1.  Local antibiotic delivery vehicles in the treatment of musculoskeletal infection.

Authors:  Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Teicoplanin in the treatment of bone and joint infections: An open study.

Authors:  J. LeFrock; A. Ristuccia
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.211

3.  Characterization of a rabbit model of staphylococcal osteomyelitis.

Authors:  M S Smeltzer; J R Thomas; S G Hickmon; R A Skinner; C L Nelson; D Griffith; T R Parr; R P Evans
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Alternative materials to acrylic bone cement for delivery of depot antibiotics in orthopaedic infections.

Authors:  Alex C McLaren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The treatment of experimental osteomyelitis by surgical debridement and the implantation of calcium sulfate tobramycin pellets.

Authors:  Carl L Nelson; Sandra G McLaren; Robert A Skinner; Mark S Smeltzer; J Roby Thomas; Keith M Olsen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Antibiotics for local delivery systems cause skeletal cell toxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Valentin Antoci; Christopher S Adams; Noreen J Hickok; Irving M Shapiro; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparison of the efficacy of tigecycline and teicoplanin in an experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis model.

Authors:  O Kandemir; V Oztuna; M Colak; A Akdag; H Camdeviren
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.714

Review 8.  Surgical management of chronic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Brad Parsons; Elton Strauss
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Linezolid versus teicoplanin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the critically ill: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study.

Authors:  Jorge A Cepeda; Tony Whitehouse; Ben Cooper; Janeane Hails; Karen Jones; Felicia Kwaku; Lee Taylor; Samantha Hayman; Steven Shaw; Christopher Kibbler; Robert Shulman; Mervyn Singer; A Peter R Wilson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Adult osteomyelitis: debridement versus debridement plus Osteoset T pellets.

Authors:  Wang Chang; Marco Colangeli; Simone Colangeli; Claudia Di Bella; Enrico Gozzi; Davide Donati
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.500

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Nanostructured platforms for the sustained and local delivery of antibiotics in the treatment of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Vuk Uskokovic
Journal:  Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.889

2.  Chitosan sponges for local synergistic infection therapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Keaton Smith; Abteen R Moshref; Jessica A Jennings; Harry S Courtney; Warren O Haggard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Antibiotic-loaded synthetic calcium sulfate beads for prevention of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation in periprosthetic infections.

Authors:  R P Howlin; M J Brayford; J S Webb; J J Cooper; S S Aiken; P Stoodley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vivo effect of quaternized chitosan-loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cement on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infection of the tibial metaphysis in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Hong-Lue Tan; Hai-Yong Ao; Rui Ma; Wen-Tao Lin; Ting-Ting Tang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Combination therapy with vancomycin-loaded calcium sulfate and vancomycin-loaded PMMA in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Shanchao Luo; Tongmeng Jiang; Yingnian Yang; Xiaoping Yang; Jinmin Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  A dual PMMA/calcium sulfate carrier of vancomycin is more effective than PMMA-vancomycin at inhibiting Staphylococcus aureus growth in vitro.

Authors:  Shanchao Luo; Tongmeng Jiang; Lina Long; Yingnian Yang; Xiaoping Yang; Lan Luo; Jinli Li; Zhiyu Chen; Chongqi Zou; Shixing Luo
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.693

7.  A novel injectable borate bioactive glass cement as an antibiotic delivery vehicle for treating osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Hao Ding; Cun-Ju Zhao; Xu Cui; Yi-Fei Gu; Wei-Tao Jia; Mohamed N Rahaman; Yang Wang; Wen-Hai Huang; Chang-Qing Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dual delivery of active antibactericidal agents and bone morphogenetic protein at sustainable high concentrations using biodegradable sheath-core-structured drug-eluting nanofibers.

Authors:  Yung-Hen Hsu; Chang-Tun Lin; Yi-Hsun Yu; Ying-Chao Chou; Shih-Jung Liu; Err-Cheng Chan
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-08-17

9.  Effects of Local Application of Nano-silver on Osteomyelitis and Soft Tissue Infections: An Experimental Study in Rats.

Authors:  Bahattin Kemah; Gökçer Uzer; Yalçın Turhan; Burak Özturan; Bülent Kılıç; Bilge Sümbül Gültepe; Ayşe Bahar Ceyran; Selim Ertürk; Burak Aksoylu; Özlem Şenaydın; Korhan Özkan
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-04-12

10.  Chronic Osteomyelitis - Bacterial Flora, Antibiotic Sensitivity and Treatment Challenges.

Authors:  Kuzma Jerzy; Hombhanje Francis
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-03-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.