Literature DB >> 11810487

Teicoplanin in the treatment of bone and joint infections: An open study.

J. LeFrock1, A. Ristuccia.   

Abstract

Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis caused by Gram-positive pathogens may require prolonged inpatient treatment. The glycopeptide antibiotic, teicoplanin, can be administered once daily to outpatients, and was assessed in a multicenter, open trial in patients with such infections. Patients with proven Gram-positive osteomyelitis or septic arthritis were treated with once-daily teicoplanin, 6-12 mg/kg per day, after three loading doses at intervals of 12 h, for 4-6 weeks. A total of 342 patients were recruited, of whom 220 were fully evaluable. Surgical procedures were performed in 82% of patients. Clinical success by the end of treatment was recorded in 81/90 patients (90%) with acute osteomyelitis, 70/79 patients (88.6%) with chronic osteomyelitis, and 42/51 patients (82.4%) with septic arthritis. Four patients with acute and 4 with chronic osteomyelitis and 5 patients with septic arthritis failed to respond to treatment. Relapse was known to have occurred in 10 patients with osteomyelitis and 4 with septic arthritis. Mean trough levels of teicoplanin reached during the first week of therapy were 10 mg/l (mean dose, 6 mg/kg) and 21 mg/l (mean dose, 12 mg/kg). A mean of 75% of the treatment course was given at home. One or more adverse events were reported in 166/342 patients (48.5%), 119 (34.8%) of which were thought to be related to teicoplanin, and treatment was discontinued in 59 patients. Fever, chills, and rashes were the most common side-effects, but were usually mild. Teicoplanin was shown to be a cost-effective method of treatment of bone and joint infections caused by multiple-resistant Gram-positive pathogens.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11810487     DOI: 10.1007/s101560050005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  5 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo efficacies of teicoplanin-loaded calcium sulfate for treatment of chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Wei-Tao Jia; Shi-Hua Luo; Chang-Qing Zhang; Jian-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and infectious disease management of osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections in adults.

Authors:  S Esposito; S Leone; M Bassetti; S Borrè; F Leoncini; E Meani; M Venditti; F Mazzotta
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.455

3.  Teicoplanin-based antimicrobial therapy in Staphylococcus aureus bone and joint infection: tolerance, efficacy and experience with subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  Olivier Peeters; Tristan Ferry; Florence Ader; André Boibieux; Evelyne Braun; Anissa Bouaziz; Judith Karsenty; Emmanuel Forestier; Frédéric Laurent; Sébastien Lustig; Christian Chidiac; Florent Valour
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Daptomycin versus teicoplanin for bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a high teicoplanin minimal inhibitory concentration ≥1.5 mg/L: a propensity score-based analysis.

Authors:  Ching-Yen Tsai; Chen-Hsiang Lee; I-Ling Chen
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Impact of teicoplanin maintenance dose and MIC values on the clinical outcomes of patients treated for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Ching-Yen Tsai; Chen-Hsiang Lee; Chun-Chih Chien; I-Ling Chen
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.