Literature DB >> 19917563

The ipsilateral motor cortex contributes to cross-limb transfer of performance gains after ballistic motor practice.

Michael Lee1, Mark R Hinder, Simon C Gandevia, Timothy J Carroll.   

Abstract

Although it has long been known that practicing a motor task with one limb can improve performance with the limb opposite, the mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we tested the hypothesis that improved performance with the untrained limb on a fastest possible (i.e. ballistic) movement task depends partly on cortical circuits located ipsilateral to the trained limb. The idea that crossed effects, which are important for the learning process, might occur in the 'untrained' hemisphere following ballistic training is based on the observation that tasks requiring strong descending drive generate extensive bilateral cortical activity. Twenty-one volunteers practiced a ballistic index finger abduction task with their right hand, and corticospinal excitability was assessed in two hand muscles (first dorsal interosseus, FDI; adductor digiti minimi, ADM). Eight control subjects did not train. After training, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS; 15 min at 1 Hz) was applied to the left (trained) or right (untrained) motor cortex to induce a 'virtual lesion'. A third training group received sham rTMS, and control subjects received rTMS to the right motor cortex. Performance and corticospinal excitability (for FDI) increased in both hands for training but not control subjects. rTMS of the left, trained motor cortex specifically reduced training-induced gains in motor performance for the right, trained hand, and rTMS of the right, untrained motor cortex specifically reduced performance gains for the left, untrained hand. Thus, cortical processes within the untrained hemisphere, ipsilateral to the trained hand, contribute to early retention of ballistic performance gains for the untrained limb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19917563      PMCID: PMC2821559          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.183855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  64 in total

1.  Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; L Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Timing and force components in bilateral transfer of learning.

Authors:  L A Teixeira
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Reliability of the input-output properties of the cortico-spinal pathway obtained from transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  T J Carroll; S Riek; R G Carson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Jose Rafael Romero; David Anschel; Roland Sparing; Massimo Gangitano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Wolf Muellbacher; Ulf Ziemann; Joerg Wissel; Nguyet Dang; Markus Kofler; Stefano Facchini; Babak Boroojerdi; Werner Poewe; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex.

Authors:  W Gerschlager; H R Siebner; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Hartwig Roman Siebner; John Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Intermanual transfer of force control is modulated by asymmetry of muscular strength.

Authors:  Luis Augusto Teixeira; Leandro Quedas Caminha
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Modulation of input-output curves by low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  Massimo Gangitano; Antoni Valero-Cabré; José Maria Tormos; Felix Manuel Mottaghy; Jose Rafael Romero; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Acute remapping within the motor system induced by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Lucy Lee; Hartwig R Siebner; James B Rowe; Vincenzo Rizzo; John C Rothwell; Richard S J Frackowiak; Karl J Friston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  74 in total

Review 1.  Role of the mirror-neuron system in cross-education.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Glyn Howatson; Endre E Kádár; Jonathan P Farthing; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with altered activity-dependent modulation of short-interval intracortical inhibition in bilateral M1.

Authors:  Olivier Morin-Moncet; Alexandre Latulipe-Loiselle; Jean-Marc Therrien-Blanchet; Hugo Theoret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Motor learning and cross-limb transfer rely upon distinct neural adaptation processes.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Timothy J Carroll; Jeffery J Summers; Mark R Hinder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Exercise-induced muscle damage and the repeated bout effect: evidence for cross transfer.

Authors:  Chelsea Starbuck; Roger G Eston
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Mitsunari Abe; David A Luckenbaugh; Janine Reis; John W Krakauer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The time course of cross-education during short-term isometric strength training.

Authors:  Joshua C Carr; Xin Ye; Matt S Stock; Michael G Bemben; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Cross-education of muscular strength is facilitated by homeostatic plasticity.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Jacqueline Williams; Michael Spittle; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Unilateral movement preparation causes task-specific modulation of TMS responses in the passive, opposite limb.

Authors:  Lilian Chye; Stephan Riek; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Crossed corticospinal facilitation between arm and trunk muscles in humans.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chiou; Paul H Strutton; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.