Literature DB >> 19916749

Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.

S A Czerniec1, L C Ward, K M Refshauge, J Beith, M J Lee, S York, S L Kilbreath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between physical methods of measuring lymphedema and self-reported swelling, their reliability, and standard error of measurement.
METHOD: Lymphedema in each arm of women with (n = 33) and without (n = 18) unilateral arm lymphedema, secondary to breast cancer was measured by self-report, bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), perometer, and the truncated cone method.
RESULTS: The physical measurement tools were highly reliable (ICC((2,1)): 0.94 to 1.00) with high concordance (r(c): 0.89 to 0.99). Self-report correlated moderately with physical measurements (r = 0.65 to 0.71) and was moderately reliable (ICC((2,1)): 0.70).
CONCLUSIONS: Lymphedema assessment methods are concordant and reliable but not interchangeable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19916749     DOI: 10.3109/07357900902918494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  55 in total

1.  Prospective surveillance of breast cancer-related lymphoedema in the first-year post-surgery: feasibility and comparison of screening measures.

Authors:  J M Blaney; G McCollum; J Lorimer; J Bradley; R Kennedy; J P Rankin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Standardized approach to lymphedema screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Dylke; Leigh C Ward; Sharon L Kilbreath
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

3.  Quantitative and morphologic change associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Comparison of 3.0T MRI to external measures.

Authors:  Gregory C Gardner; Joshua P Nickerson; Richard Watts; Lee Nelson; Kim L Dittus; Patricia J O'Brien
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.589

4.  Lipedema and Dercum's Disease: A New Application of Bioimpedance.

Authors:  Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Sandra Weakley; Maria Garza; Manus J Donahue; Karen L Herbst
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.589

5.  The effect of prospective monitoring and early physiotherapy intervention on arm morbidity following surgery for breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chiara Singh; Mary De Vera; Kristin L Campbell
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Implementation of Single-Tab Electrodes for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measures.

Authors:  Paula M C Donahue; Rachelle Crescenzi; Liping Du; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.589

7.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of clinical measures of breast cancer-related lymphedema: area under the curve.

Authors:  Betty J Smoot; Josephine F Wong; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  L-dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.

Authors:  M R Fu; C M Cleland; A A Guth; M Kayal; J Haber; F Cartwright; R Kleinman; Y Kang; J Scagliola; D Axelrod
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  Agreement between telerehabilitation involving caregivers and face-to-face clinical assessment of lymphedema in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  N Galiano-Castillo; A Ariza-García; I Cantarero-Villanueva; C Fernández-Lao; C Sánchez-Salado; M Arroyo-Morales
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Transient swelling versus lymphoedema in the first year following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Kilbreath; Mi-Joung Lee; Kathryn M Refshauge; Jane M Beith; Leigh C Ward; J M Simpson; D Black
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.