BACKGROUND: Second-generation antidepressants dominate the management of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Evidence on the general and comparative benefits and harms is still accruing. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine for the treatment of acute-phase MDD in adults. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsychLit, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 to July 2009, as well as manually searching reference lists of pertinent review articles and exploring the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research database to identify unpublished research. STUDY SELECTION: For efficacy, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing duloxetine with placebo or second-generation antidepressants were included. For safety, both experimental and observational studies were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstracts and full-text articles were independently reviewed by two people, one investigator extracted relevant data, and a senior reviewer checked data for completeness and accuracy. RESULTS: We included 36 experimental and observational studies and, where sufficient data were available, meta-analyses of RCTs were conducted. Findings indicated that duloxetine is an effective treatment option for acute-phase MDD, with a tolerability profile similar to other second-generation antidepressants. No substantial differences in efficacy and safety appear to exist when duloxetine is compared with other second-generation antidepressants. Overall, about 40% of patients treated with duloxetine achieved remission. Compared with other treatments, duloxetine had frequently higher rates of nausea, vomiting and dry mouth; however, these differences did not lead to higher discontinuation rates compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as a class. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about rare but severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not warrant the choice of duloxetine over other second-generation antidepressants based on greater efficacy or safety for patients with acute-phase MDD with or without accompanying symptoms such as pain.
BACKGROUND: Second-generation antidepressants dominate the management of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Evidence on the general and comparative benefits and harms is still accruing. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine for the treatment of acute-phase MDD in adults. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsychLit, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 to July 2009, as well as manually searching reference lists of pertinent review articles and exploring the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research database to identify unpublished research. STUDY SELECTION: For efficacy, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing duloxetine with placebo or second-generation antidepressants were included. For safety, both experimental and observational studies were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstracts and full-text articles were independently reviewed by two people, one investigator extracted relevant data, and a senior reviewer checked data for completeness and accuracy. RESULTS: We included 36 experimental and observational studies and, where sufficient data were available, meta-analyses of RCTs were conducted. Findings indicated that duloxetine is an effective treatment option for acute-phase MDD, with a tolerability profile similar to other second-generation antidepressants. No substantial differences in efficacy and safety appear to exist when duloxetine is compared with other second-generation antidepressants. Overall, about 40% of patients treated with duloxetine achieved remission. Compared with other treatments, duloxetine had frequently higher rates of nausea, vomiting and dry mouth; however, these differences did not lead to higher discontinuation rates compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as a class. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about rare but severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not warrant the choice of duloxetine over other second-generation antidepressants based on greater efficacy or safety for patients with acute-phase MDD with or without accompanying symptoms such as pain.
Authors: J Craig Nelson; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Craig H Mallinckrodt; Michael J Detke; John G Watkin; John S Kennedy Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Vivien K Burt; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Craig H Mallinckrodt; Michael J Detke; John G Watkin; Donna E Stewart Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Donna E Stewart; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Craig H Mallinckrodt; John G Watkin; Susan G Kornstein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2006-06-14 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Michael E Thase; Pierre V Tran; Curtis Wiltse; Beth A Pangallo; Craig Mallinckrodt; Michael J Detke Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Michael J Detke; Curtis G Wiltse; Craig H Mallinckrodt; Robert K McNamara; Mark A Demitrack; Istvan Bitter Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: James I Hudson; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Daniel K Kajdasz; Craig H Mallinckrodt; John G Watkin; Oleg V Martynov Journal: Hum Psychopharmacol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 1.672
Authors: Richard C Shelton; Anne C Andorn; Craig H Mallinckrodt; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Joel Raskin; John G Watkin; Michael J Detke Journal: Int Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 1.659
Authors: Yafang Zhang; Elizabeth J Crofton; Tileena E S Smith; Shyny Koshy; Dingge Li; Thomas A Green Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Faiza Siddiqui; Marija Barbateskovic; Sophie Juul; Kiran Kumar Katakam; Klaus Munkholm; Christian Gluud; Janus Christian Jakobsen Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2021-06-09
Authors: Min-Soo Lee; Yong Min Ahn; Seockhoon Chung; Richard Walton; Joel Raskin; Mun Sung Kim Journal: Psychiatry Investig Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 2.505