Literature DB >> 1991626

Twelve hour overnight oesophageal pH monitoring in patients with reflux symptoms.

S Boesby1, L Wallin, T Myrhøj, L I Andersen.   

Abstract

Results of continuous 12 hour overnight pH monitoring (duration of pH less than 4) were reviewed in 112 patients with heartburn or regurgitation, or both, and in 56 normal subjects. Patients had more reflux than normal subjects. Medically controlled patients (n = 51) had less acid reflux than patients who subsequently underwent reflux surgery (n = 61), but there was a considerable overlap between those two groups. Surgery was followed by a reduction in acid reflux to a value similar to that in normal subjects. Patients in whom surgery was deemed to have failed had more reflux after the operation than those in whom it was successful, but no difference could be found in the preoperative reflux values of these two subgroups. Monitoring pH is not of value in selecting candidates for surgery since the results are not a good predictor of outcome, but it is useful in the objective evaluation of surgical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1991626      PMCID: PMC1379204          DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.1.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  10 in total

1.  Gastro-oesophageal acid reflux. Method for 12-hour continuous recording of oesophageal pH with analysis of records.

Authors:  S Boesby; T Madsen; H R Sörensen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; P E Isberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Correlation between manometric and pH tests for gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  C Stanciu; R C Hoare; J R Bennett
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.

Authors:  M W Gear; E W Gillison; B L Dowling
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Gastroesophageal reflux. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Symptoms and endoscopic findings in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; K Gudmundsson; L Greiff
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Evaluation of current operations for the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  T R Demeester; L F Johnson; A H Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Effects of fundoplication on the antireflux mechanism.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; K Gudmundsson; C H Florén; B Walther
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Ambulatory monitoring of oesophageal pH in reflux oesophagitis using a portable radiotelemetry system.

Authors:  F J Branicki; D F Evans; A L Ogilvie; M Atkinson; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Prolonged intraesophageal pH monitoring with 16-hr overnight recording. Comparison with "24-hr" analysis.

Authors:  R Dobhan; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.